Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi all,

just after some help on what turbos people here have choosen to upgrade their RB20.

i know people say upgrade to the RB25 turbo but i was wanting more.

i was after something which spools quickly as i am after some quick...

would something like a GT2530/35 be any good???

also what is the standard RB20 turbo?

any info would be sweet.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128947-rb20-turbo-upgrade/
Share on other sites

Different people have different ideas about how radical they want to go....

An HKS 2530 will spool about the same as the original turbo, but you can run much higher boost because it does not have the problem of the fragile ceramic turbine wheel. The 2530 is also more efficient at higher pressure ratios, and has higher maximum airflow than the original turbo.

The problem is, these 2530 turbos are now getting very old and HKS don't make them anymore. A secondhand one may be worn out or stuffed.

But HKS are about to bring out a brand new replacement for the 2530 which is 2006 state of the art technology, called the GT-ZZ. The dealers do not have them yet, but maybe in a month or two, who knows ???

Latest technology with turbos, is like latest technology with computers, always better and advancing very rapidly as time goes on.

Not always....

The old design turbos all had a much narrower flow range, so turbo matching was a lot more critical, a little bit too big, and it WOULD be a lag monster. Too small and there would be no top end airflow.

What the latest technology turbos have is a vastly wider flow range, as well as less inertia and a higher overall efficiency.

So you can now fit a larger turbo and get more airflow without losing anything in response or boost threshold. Or you can downsize slightly and get a massive improvement in response and mid range, without losing anything up top. It may not have much extra horsepower to brag about, but it will make a much faster and easier to drive road car.

Don't just think about turbo size, think also about flow range. The latest in turbo technology is always going to beat the older turbo designs in every way.

so if the RB20DET is laggy, what causes the lag?

is it because the throttle body is right in the middle of the rocker cover?

so with a front mount is has a long pipe from the cooler to the throttle body?

no.

2L capacity = not much exhast gas being produced to spool the turbo at low rpm. this means the turbo comes on slowly

larger capacity engines produce more exhaust gas, thus find it easier to spin the exhaust wheel and can generate boost quicker...

TB has nothing to do with it, and length of cooler pipes makes sweet f*** all difference also.

mmm.. you will find cooler piping does make a noticeable difference.

A top mount cooler running f**k all piping will seem quiet more responsive and less laggy, where as a large say 3' piping onto a fmic will obviously have more lag as the air has to travel further to get into the motor!

It wont be huge but its noticable!

In regards to the turbo you should get sh*t all lag with a HKS 25/10!

A 25/30 will be more similar to a stock turbo and can flow up to 280rwhp (with supporting mods),

Anything bigger and you really start to notice lag, which wen you run around with a low compression 2l motor isnt the best lol

Edited by jazza08

so you have noticed this yourself, on your own car?

or are you writing from keyboard experience?

i went from the stock cooler to a larger FMIC with 2.75" piping and noticed no difference in lag. i think and change would be minimal and not noticable...

from my experience, its right in theory but doesn't really translate in the real world...

I noticed a bit of lag since i put my cooler on yesterday, but more top end...

and VL turbo flutter... cho cho cho cho cho :thumbsup: love it

Im thinking turbo upgrade too. My theory is best bang for buck, with 25% more flow, better top end and more boost. r33 turbo for $350 is best bang for buck in my eyes. spending over a grand on a turbo for a low teens car dosent appeal to me very much.....

i had stok cooler came on boost mad 2nd gear peelin on boost

went to 3inch mandrel from exhaust technology with hybrid cooler f*k me lag monster but yeh top pulls way harder !

mates cefiro same so yes lag is big issue with cooler pipes

ok then...

if i got a standard R33 turbo hi-flowed etc could i get it turned into a ball bearing turbo?

or will it remain standard bush bearing/roller bearing?

and would the internal wheel be changed to a steel wheel or stay ceramic?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...