Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi peoples...

I've just finished reading an article in the latest "ZOOM" magazine about the datsun 1600 SR20det on gas...

From reading the article it seemed to me there were some serious advantages for a straight gas system in a turbocharged application.

Some of the advantages of using straigh gas (according to the article) are;

*better fuel economy "flat out, insterstate travelling 600km to a 60 litre tank"

*The higher octane level in the gas allowed 35 degrees of timing

*High RON rating which is perfect for high boost engines (with no detenation)

*No need for upgrading injectors, fuel pump, pressure regulators...

He's spun up 228kw at the wheels..

To me this seems like the perfect way to go .. but i'm hesitant as i havn't seen many high performance cars using gas.

Is there any disadvantages ?

Any input would be appreciated. As i would consider it for my rb20det.

Travis

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/
Share on other sites

Probably the biggest disadvantage in a Skyline is you will lose most of your boot space. The tank and equipment also adds a fair bit of weight to the car so with the same power your car will be a little bit slower. But I have seen several turbo drag cars running on gas, I think the most famous is the 11 second street-driven XE Falcon. Not too sure about this "flat out, insterstate travelling 600km to a 60 litre tank" though, I can already do that with my R33.

Aside from the initial cost and extra weight I can't think of too many drawbacks. I think it's not as popular with the weekend driven cars because it takes a lot longer to recoup that initial outlay due to the relatively low amount of km done.

Oh another advantage to it is you never have to worry about getting defected for emissions :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-244091
Share on other sites

Also, all gas systems use a carby setup, meaning you'll never get perfect mixtures at mid throttle, midload situations.

All the fuel maps on your CPU will not be required...

To have a properly setup hipo gas system you would most likely require some changes to your engine, as per the hotter combstion point above and also I think LPG lacks some of the lubrication qualities that petrol has...

And the weight/space dissadvantage, but you do get very cheap 100 RON+ fuel.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-244349
Share on other sites

I was always under the impression that LPG had a low octane rating. In the 80s somewhere. One of the guys I work with has a LPG converted Falcon and he says he loses a fair bit of power when he switches over. Also, the stock LPG AU Falcon had less power than the petrol one. Can anyone explain this?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-244398
Share on other sites

It's most likely just in the tuning - think about it, the majority of people that convert to LPG are only really interested in the cost savings - not potential power upgrade.

Also just because it's higher octane doesn't automatically mean more power, if you put a higher octance petrol in your car more than likely you won't pick up much, if any extra power. All a higher octane number means is its more resistant to detonating, meaning you can run more aggressive ignition timing and/or more boost, and in turn getting more power.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-244426
Share on other sites

I have heard that you will not get any performance gains if your running a dual fuel system (switchable from petrol to gas) In this method the car is tuned to the two types of fuel therefore compromising performance on either switch.

Running a straight gas setup your car is tuned primarily to gas..

This is only what i've heard..

Travis

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-244460
Share on other sites

meteor - I'd say it would have been tuned - I mean a car with optimal A/F ratios is usually more economical. He did it for cost savings, so economy was important.

R31 - Fair enough, If it wasn't tuned for both then I can understand that, but that doesn't explain why the stock AU Falcon on gas (from the factory) makes less power than the petrol model. Surely they would tune it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-244475
Share on other sites

There are two main reasons why factory cars usually make less fuel on gas. Firstly, they are usually dual fuel which means they can't advance the timing as much, in order to enable it to be run on regular unleaded when needed. The second is that LPG has less energy in it than normal petrol.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-244491
Share on other sites

Originally posted by MIC33R

meteor -  I'd say it would have been tuned - I mean a car with optimal A/F ratios is usually more economical. He did it for cost savings, so economy was important.

A/F ratios are one thing, advancing the timing is another. Also it's possible that the most ecomonical A/F ratios do not provide the best power... But at the end of the day, I doubt it would make that much difference on an NA falcon.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-244529
Share on other sites

i don't even know whether straight LPG would be possible without some serious fiddling with the inside and outside of the engine??

Isn't the whole idea of a turbo engine you compress the air and fuel a lot more to get better power out of less (cylinder) space ? Does that translate for gas even at all?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-245461
Share on other sites

Running straight gas could be advantagous as you could lose the the weight of a fuel tank injectors ect, and mount the bottle in the fuel tanks place or run 2 skinny bottles for a 32 thus keeping boot space, the gas jet would need to be mounted before the factory throttle body but after the ic.

boost would help compress the gas more compared to a high pressure fule system with injectors and the gas is already under pressure and compressed in the bottle.

The luberication issues with gas was only with cars running on the old super leaded type fuel wasnt it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-245853
Share on other sites

fatz.... 4k on a gas system??

I got quoted $1700 drive in drive out..

so then i gots $2300 to spend on a massive turbo..

then keep up with me :)

damqik GTS-T .. u sound like you know a lot about his issue.. do you know anyone who has done the conversion on an RB series engine? in your personal opinion would you say its worthwhile?

Trav

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-245968
Share on other sites

RED17 a vl (rb30) dosn't have a blow off valve to protect the turbo from backfires a rb20det - rb25det & rb26dett dose backfire's wouldnt be an issue. A backfire on gas would be caused from incorrect tuneing or when changeing from one fuel to the other (duelfuel setup).

R31_GTSX I used to work for a shop (in Nundah Qld) that did lpg conversons.

I have only seen the rb30 motor on gas and some vg30's none of which had any issue's.

Damqik

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12950-rb20det-on-gas/#findComment-246975
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...