Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A turbocharger helps at high altitudes, where the air is less dense. Normal engines will experience reduced power at high altitudes because for each stroke of the piston, the engine will get a smaller mass of air. A turbocharged engine may also have reduced power, but the reduction will be less dramatic because the thinner air is easier for the turbocharger to pump.

So this statement is true?

Edited by MKDR33

I think the way it works is that there is less atmospheric pressure with which to feed the compressor wheel . Just the same as an NA engine doesn't "suck" in its charge air neither does the turbocharger . Technically there is no such thing as suck , just movement of air from an area of higher pressure to an area of lower pressure . So in other words there comes a time when there is not enough weight or mass of air (oxygen actually) available to feed the engine all it wants so power drops .

Its interesting to note that piston engined aircraft often seek to only provide sea level manifold pressure up to about 40,000 Ft . In the last world war RR used multi staged two speed radial compressors (technically superchargers because they were mechanically driven) to get high altitude performance from their Merlins and Griffons . The Americans used large low pressure turbochargers for Allison V type and Pratt and Whitney radials though they were not very high tech devices .

Sea level atmospheric pressure doesn't vary a whole lot arount the 1000 millibars/100Kpa/14.7 Psia so charge density would move around a little but not by a huge amount . Since we have no say about atmospheric pressure and temperature (air density) the only things we can bias our way are compressor efficiency and effective charge air cooling (intercooling) .

Cheers .

shootout mode only changes due to the AIR TEMP not the temperatures entered they are only to list on the corrections part of the SHEET

The tune also changes where the air is more or less dense so this determines more or less power.

Edited by MR331307

BP does effect dyno readings. My dyno tuners BP was always low , around the 980 mark and subsequently readings where higher than normal. When he was getting his Dyno serviced they didnt check this until a guy said your BP is very low. He now rings the local airport which is just around the corner for there readings before he puts a car on. Subsequently, dyno numbers arent as generous as what they used to be,

shootout mode only changes due to the AIR TEMP not the temperatures entered they are only to list on the corrections part of the SHEET

The tune also changes where the air is more or less dense so this determines more or less power.

wrong

Robo's is correct

A turbocharger helps at high altitudes, where the air is less dense. Normal engines will experience reduced power at high altitudes because for each stroke of the piston, the engine will get a smaller mass of air. A turbocharged engine may also have reduced power, but the reduction will be less dramatic because the thinner air is easier for the turbocharger to pump.

So this statement is true?

Wrong. A turbo wastegate operates on relative, not absolute, pressure. 10psi boost is 10psi above atmospheric. If your atmospheric pressure drops so does the absolute pressure you are stuffing into the engine, hence power will drop in proportion.

discopotato's comment about 2-stage compressors is correct - they ran a "high boost" level at altitude, to compensate for the reduced air pressure. Running high boost at sea level would have blown up the engine.

so the BP levels have no affect with the dyno results, as they enter these into the dyno, but the temperatures surely must, as in winter my car goes harder due to the colder air outside, whereas in summer there is a deffinate power decrease..

anyone recommend dry-ice intake setups?

but the temperatures surely must, as in winter my car goes harder due to the colder air outside, whereas in summer there is a deffinate power decrease..

anyone recommend dry-ice intake setups?

Hence the reason why shootout mode software was developed. It compensates by either adding power when temps are high or reducing when they are cold. In theory, if you ran on the dyno in winter and then on a 40 deg day in summer results should be the same using the shootout method.

Dry Ice? Pointless for a car that sees any street driving as you would have to constantly fill it up. My mate has a 800rwhp dyno warrior with a large dry ice setup and 3 power runs later its empty. And its hard to find and not cheap.

All you need is an ECU which runs a Air temp sensor and it compenstates the difference

If your temps are cooler you can run more timing and modifying fuel

if they get hottier you reduce the timing

When i data loged my car at the track and the dyno they were no different so this means the tune doesnt change.

you also have to have an intercooler Sufficent to your engines needs

if you had an aspirated engine Yes this makes a huge difference

but with an intercooled car nothing changes if its setup right.

The reason why the Hp changes on shootout is because the air temps go up and down

when i enter the temps the Correction Factor doesnt change

but if i put the sensor near the Exhaust or in a bucket of cold water it does.

like i said before the temps entered are only for the Corrections table

The reason for this is when you have the car on my dyno it might read 250 rwhp

but on someone else same dyno reads 260 hp

you can have a look on the sheet and see what temps are different.

Shootout mode also has a set RAMP RATE which you select and on turbo skylines will be SHOOT 6F which has a pre set Rate which you run your car on

When a dyno isnt run on shootout mode the Ramp rates need to be entered in and if the ramp is too much it will read less power and have a different tune to what its supposed to

and if its set really low will show higher HP readings and same the tune will be out by not being Enough.

People should respect Shootout mode and stop banging it as dyno dynamics didnt invent it for nothing.

I find tuning in shootout mode you wont need to do a ROAD TUNE as well.Because it loads the car up perfectly.I have done alot of reasearch into dynos and have found the Dyno dynamics to be the best for PERFORMANCE.If you want the extra DATA LOGGING computers like mainline ETC its just a extra option

Edited by MR331307

And which shootout mode are you talking about?

There's many and as the number rises the ramp rate is less to prevent wheel spin.. i.e the difference between SHOOT6 and SHOOT81. The Shoot81 is much softer than shoot6 and for some strange reason shoot81 also reads around 30rwkw higher, well in a back to back run that I've seen. >_<

so the BP levels have no affect with the dyno results, as they enter these into the dyno, but the temperatures surely must, as in winter my car goes harder due to the colder air outside, whereas in summer there is a deffinate power decrease..

anyone recommend dry-ice intake setups?

Hang on, if they enter in the wrong BP levels,it will have an impact on the result, just like what i stated above when the weather station was wrong.

And which shootout mode are you talking about?

There's many and as the number rises the ramp rate is less to prevent wheel spin.. i.e the difference between SHOOT6 and SHOOT81. The Shoot81 is much softer than shoot6 and for some strange reason shoot81 also reads around 30rwkw higher, well in a back to back run that I've seen. >_<

SHOOT81 HUH

never seen that before

The shootout mode has 6 modes

SHOOT 4 (NA 4 cylinder)

SHOOT 6 (NA 6 Cylinder)

SHOOT 8 (NA 8 cylinder)

SHOOT 4F (turbo,NOS,Supercharged 4 cylinder)

SHOOT 6F (turbo,NOS,Supercharged 6 cylinder)

SHOOT 8F (turbo,NOS,Supercharged 8 cylinder)

theres a mode for rotary too

All have pre set Ramp Rates.If your not using the correct ones it isnt the Dynos fault or problem.Just bad Dynoing.AND if you can Brake Traction on a Dyno Dynamics dyno you have problems as i have had mark Hayes on my dyno Running 1142 RWHP and it didnt have a problem.Maybe suggest NEW TYRES :)

Like i said If its used correctly its the best method for TUNING AND finding out how much hp your cars got.

Just remember A DYNO IS A TUNING TOOL :sorcerer:

All have pre set Ramp Rates.If your not using the correct ones it isnt the Dynos fault or problem.Just bad Dynoing.AND if you can Brake Traction on a Dyno Dynamics dyno you have problems as i have had mark Hayes on my dyno Running 1142 RWHP and it didnt have a problem.Maybe suggest NEW TYRES :)

Like i said If its used correctly its the best method for TUNING AND finding out how much hp your cars got.

Just remember A DYNO IS A TUNING TOOL :sorcerer:

Yer typo...

I do think you missed my point though. >_<

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...