Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 245
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hey rs73, could you note that I'm after 909G (Slotted & Drilled)

Cheers

Shane, they're not drilled, just dimpled (the holes do not go through the disc but more like "dents").

If this is not ok just let me know.

UPDATE:

I've made a list of people ordering for group buy in this spreadsheet attached in the first post on first page of this thread.

Please check if your order is correct (don't worry too much first about part no, I will double check with RDA), just make sure your car, slotted or dimpled option, and Front or Rear discs information is correct.

you should be able to view it, just enter blank password and click read only.

I will update your orders to dimpled I'll verify the size when I speak with RDA tomorrow in regards to part numbers.

As they haven't exactly replied whether we got the better or the lesser discount depending on total qty of pairs, all I listed in there is the full retail price prior to discount. will update ASAP, just make sure that your car and disc are correct.

Hi,

Do u realise that the R32 GTR and R33 GTR front and rear brakes are diffrent?

R32 GTR (89-93) Front = 296 x 32mm

Rear = 297 x 18mm

R32 (8/93-12/94)

R33 (95- on)

R34 Front = 324 x 30mm

Rear = 300 x 22mm

Maybe with R32 GTR get them to post what month/year

Mine is a 12/92 which makes it the earlier model 296 x 32mm

Thanks >_<

The RDA part no excel sheet is not very clear when it comes to different R32 GTRs, but it all comes clear when I cross checked against DBA parts catalogue which is a lot neater.

I've been trying to get in touch with the guy Scott from RDA, haven't heard from him yet, will try again later.

Hi Guys,

The group buy is not off yet, I was told by RDA that our contact, Scott, is away (on leave) until Friday tomorrow. So most likely I will hear from him about pricing, etc tomorrow or early next week (Monday).

Sorry for any inconveniences, as him going on leave is out of my control. If any of you have time-critical schedule to get the rotors on your car for whatever reason (motorsport etc), and cannot wait any longer and need to back out now I can understand, that's fine just let me know.

And as a few members expressed concern, this order is not finalised yet until I hear the discounted price and get back to all of you. Don't get too worried, I won't be putting everyone into unintentional "contract of sale" and get caught up in unexpected price at the end. Only when you agreed, then we'll proceed with finalising your order, payment and delivery costs for those who choose to get delivered.

I've organised about 3 or 4 skid pan days back in 2003 & 2004 without any dramas or hassles, and I intend to keep it hassle-free as well for this group buy.

Thanks for all your Hard work Rianto. Greatly appreciated and I am sure the discount is worth the wait.

All good stuff takes time.

will wait till they give you an up to date listing.

I suspect only the R32 GTr is a problem.

I guess the part no is 7926S as this is similar to the DBA catalogue number.

frank

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...