Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thats right, peak values are just since its been turned on

time trial times, option settings are stored when unit is off

Edited by NewKleer
  • Replies 279
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hey pete looks like you've put a lot of time and effort in to this.I'm very interested in this,but wouldn't be able to get one till late jan early feb.is it necessary to have a laptop.

also would it be possible to put a dimmer on the display

if i do another lot the displays will be dimmer anyway (to reduce power and make them slightly less bright), but itd be too hard to put a dimmer on when it would serve little purpose and only add to the cost

thats right, peak values are just since its been turned on

time trial times, option settings are stored when unit is off

hmm, oh well no point me complaining now. Was surprised as the ones Impakt made store in memory peak values.

Also, how accurate are the km speed readings? cos it reads up to 10km slower than the speed shown on dash, and i stil have stock wheels/tyres so rolling diameter is stock.

itd wouldnt be hard to have them stored in memory permanently, but then you would have to reset them to know if the peak value u got was from this time or not - for me it was much more useful to have it only for the current session

i assume that the speed km readings would be more accurate than speedo (i think by law speedos cant read lower than actual, so most of them read too high). the fact odo trip/distance in time trials are so close means that speed read by consult must be as accurate as odo input, which means if there is still a difference, then its solely speedo gauge thats not correct.

thanks for clearing that up :laugh:

also, as a point of interest i was refering to the S15 being out by 10kmh at 130kmh reading 120kmh, so if anything it should be more accurate than the my 32 due to newer speedo calibration...?

u mean newer as in the car is newer?

will probably not make much diff, and what i said before also may not apply for imports.

without having a known correct standard to measure against, the real answer as to which is more accurate is "who knows?"

  • 3 weeks later...

ive decided to hold off on the next batch till after i finish uni (ie july this year). going to spend a bit of time on the ecutalk software and maybe do a batch of plain consult interfaces before then.

wont really have enough spare time to doing another lot before then (esp the risk of money issues if they dont sell quick enough and given im not at work full time while uni is on, dont want to risk anything)

im still hoping to get some time to add the trip meter screen ive mentioned randomly (so if i get that done existing users can upgrade to that version)

Just in regards to this..

Ive decided that because I have my track day coming up on the 26th and I want to keep the display in the car at the time im going to make up a bracket so the lcd wont move..

I'll let you guys know along with some pics..

if i do another lot the displays will be dimmer anyway (to reduce power and make them slightly less bright), but itd be too hard to put a dimmer on when it would serve little purpose and only add to the cost

Pete I was looking at mine and I dont think I would want it any dimmer?

I am OLD and all but it is just legible to my eyes now and any dimmer in daytime would be hard to read.

Just my 2c and maybe doesnt apply to younger guys with better eyesight. :laugh:

I dont honestly know how I would have been without this unit over the last month or so trying to yet unsuccesfully fix my ERROR 34 Knock Sensor.

I can defeat it when wiring in the old sensors with a known faulty loom on one sensor??

And replacing the entire wires from the ECU to the Loom Plug to Knock sensors with proven continuity to sensors still gives ERROR 34!! &^$%^#

The new annular SR type sensors with Fuel Injector type plug MUST NEED THE RHS PIN TO WORK!!

I was told its the LHS PIN if the socket is on the bottom looking face down on it which is how its wired!

Its the only thing it can be!

Sorry for rant.... &*%($#**%^#(*^

yeh theyre all gone now - the last 5 took 5 weeks to sell, so no one has any excuses for missing out :laugh:

in daylight, 95% of the light for viewing display comes from natural light - the LED is useless. making it twice as bright will only improve daytime viewing by about 5%...i think maybe you want to angle the display more towards the driver

  • 1 month later...

Pete, any chance of firmware updates promised a few months ago, id love to have my injector readings perfect before i put my new ones in and turbo on...... ?

yeh i can do that (i did pm u ages ago but i guess u dont check em!)

i assume ull do your injectors/turbo before say mid-year? (which is when ill likely have the trip meter stuff done around)

  • 2 weeks later...

yes:

1) a trip meter screen (fuel used, average economy, speed, av speed, trip time, distance, etc),

2) a MPG option for the yanks.

3) maybe a secondary sensor screen (to get anything thats not on main screen, like switches such as fuel pump on/off, TPS closed/open, lean/rich, ecu self-learn O2 alpha values, etc),

may be other improvements to current features, like continually monitoring fault codes when in fault code display, etc.

once i finish uni ill have a lot more time to spend on things like this.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...