Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I wouldnt tune a car in the top end with Closed loop anyway

The haltech is the way to go mate

i installed one in a customers car around 3 weeks ago

his getting 380 kms out of a tank and the car is making around 400 rwhp

The tuning points are more finer and it is a benefit later when changeing ignition systems ETC

Even with large injectors the haltech can tune very fine.This skyline i just installed the ecu in has 850 or so cc sard injectors

The haltech is plug n Play

gets rid of the AFM

its $2750 Supplied installed and dyno tuned.

well you have proved my point for me

my gtr runs 530rwhp at 500kms plus per tank

and xspeed have gtr running higher hp running same range

AND the close loop is automatic and is for fixed throddle position (cruising) you cant and would never use the closed loop for tuning top end

I wouldnt tune a car in the top end with Closed loop anyway

The haltech is the way to go mate

i installed one in a customers car around 3 weeks ago

his getting 380 kms out of a tank and the car is making around 400 rwhp

The tuning points are more finer and it is a benefit later when changeing ignition systems ETC

Even with large injectors the haltech can tune very fine.This skyline i just installed the ecu in has 850 or so cc sard injectors

The haltech is plug n Play

gets rid of the AFM

its $2750 Supplied installed and dyno tuned.

I certainly wouldn't tune a car in closed loop in the top end either unless you want to destroy it!!! Cost of PFC and tunability is what makes it the number 1 choice of ECU for skylines. Also manufactures used closed loop as CATALYTIC converters operate most efficiently at this stoiciometric point.

Edited by rob82
I wouldnt tune a car in the top end with Closed loop anyway

The haltech is the way to go mate

i installed one in a customers car around 3 weeks ago

his getting 380 kms out of a tank and the car is making around 400 rwhp

The tuning points are more finer and it is a benefit later when changeing ignition systems ETC

Even with large injectors the haltech can tune very fine.This skyline i just installed the ecu in has 850 or so cc sard injectors

The haltech is plug n Play

gets rid of the AFM

its $2750 Supplied installed and dyno tuned.

I paid:

PowerFC + H/C $1100

Tune - $450

Z32 AFM - $350

=$1900

I made over 400rwhp

I also recieved more than 380km's to a tank

I also had 740cc injecors with an idle as good as factory

So my car did exactly the same as yours, for $800 :P

Thats virtually a set of cams or Almost a new diff

or

Almost a new clutch or Alomst a set of excellent pads/rotors

... 130 corona's in a club or 220 odd pots at the pub

See where im heading here?

At a cost of more than $800 more. Haltech is quite a badly priced opition.

Is there a hidden benefit i can get from the extra $800 that you didnt list?

I paid:

PowerFC + H/C $1100

Tune - $450

Z32 AFM - $350

=$1900

I made over 400rwhp

I also recieved more than 380km's to a tank

I also had 740cc injecors with an idle as good as factory

So my car did exactly the same as yours, for $800 :rofl:

Thats virtually a set of cams or Almost a new diff

or

Almost a new clutch or Alomst a set of excellent pads/rotors

... 130 corona's in a club or 220 odd pots at the pub

See where im heading here?

At a cost of more than $800 more. Haltech is quite a badly priced opition.

Is there a hidden benefit i can get from the extra $800 that you didnt list?

Seeing we are all having a bite of the cherry YEAH THERE IS ONE THING

4 Lady's at one time for 1 Hour...Go Power fc....FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT :P;):laugh:

I have no doubt the haltech will make great power and the car will drive fine BUT it will not compete when it comes to balanced performance and fuel comsumption

Why do you say that?

You say it wont compete when it comes to balanced performance, what is balanced performance?

You also say it wont compete with fuel consumption. If the Haltech is setup to use closed loop in the same fashion as the FC why would it not compete?

I certainly wouldn't tune a car in closed loop in the top end either unless you want to destroy it!!!

I tuned the Motec in the R32GTR using the Self Tune function (being Motec, enabling that function costs more of course). Simply set the A/F ratio aim target and did a few laps. That’s about as “closed loop” tuning as you can get. The Nissan LeMans cars ran closed loop for 24 hours for better fuel economy (less pit stops).

Closed loop power tuning is the future, no more dynos (yahoo).

:/ cheers :/

Yeah $800 Cheaper and when it comes time for ignition upgrades

......

The HALTECH COMES WITH A BASE MAP and is PLUG and PLAY

I personal dont like the APEXI computers.The Haltech is more advanced.

If you want a Good ECU with closed loop that works Acurate Chose either HYDRA,MOTEC,Autronic

Edited by MR331307

MR331307,

I'm pushing 10.6-11L/100km's out of my RB30DET, no open road driving, all short local max 20-30km trips.

Providing the cars warm it does get stick.

It drives like factory, cold and warm starts perfectly and has a perfectly stable idle. There's literally nothing I can pick with it. Driveability is perfect. It hangs in closed loop until it see's boost.

Apart from picking up a little more economy with more flexible closed loop control is it really worth the extra $$.

From my point of view, No. I don't need fandangled features that loose their novelty soon after.

You can't argue for sub 1k price tag of the apexi pfc + h/c, sequential injection, 6 coil drivers, closed loop, stepper motor control, boost kit option, excellent control of large injectors + more it really is a bargain.

There will always be better out there but it comes down to if its really warranted.

Yes my coils are on their way, they've done a minimum of 217,000km's and I'm up for ~$550 for a set of splitfires.

MR331307,

I think thats a load of crap. :/

I'm pushing 10.6-11L/100km's out of my RB30DET, no open road driving, all short local max 20-30km trips.

Providing the cars warm it does get stick.

It drives like factory, cold and warm starts perfectly and has a perfectly stable idle. There's literally nothing I can pick with it. Driveability is perfect.

Apart from picking up a little more economy with more flexible closed loop control is it really worth the extra $$.

From my point of view, No. I don't need fandangled features that loose their novelty soon after.

Thats seriously good consumption considering I'm around the 14-15L / 100Km for my RB25DET...

... but then I dont drive like a granny ;-)

* runs away *

I tuned the Motec in the R32GTR using the Self Tune function (being Motec, enabling that function costs more of course). Simply set the A/F ratio aim target and did a few laps. That’s about as “closed loop” tuning as you can get. The Nissan LeMans cars ran closed loop for 24 hours for better fuel economy (less pit stops).

Closed loop power tuning is the future, no more dynos (yahoo).

:/ cheers :/

I meant narrowband 02 sensor as in 14.4:1 at full load. Off topic but have you done any testing regarding piston crown expansion rates at various AFR?

Thats seriously good consumption considering I'm around the 14-15L / 100Km for my RB25DET...

... but then I dont drive like a granny ;-)

* runs away *

Giving it a boot full through the hills and back for almost a whole tank appears to not make too much of a difference in fuel economy. drops down to flat 400km's per tank, once i've seen 380km's but that was absolutely flogging it every chance I had. So yer worse I've had is ~13.5L/100km's roughly.

I must admit, not many R33's for what ever reason return good economy. I know of plenty R32's pushing close to the figures I do.

Yeah $800 Cheaper and when it comes time for ignition upgrades

......

The HALTECH COMES WITH A BASE MAP and is PLUG and PLAY

I personal dont like the APEXI computers.The Haltech is more advanced.

If you want a Good ECU with closed loop that works Acurate Chose either HYDRA,MOTEC,Autronic

Ok... i'll bite... what ignition upgrades do we need now?

Stock RB25 coils are good for excellent power, if they die, replace them with splitfires... which again are good for excellent power.

If 350rwkw can be had (i actually made more), what more do you need in a street application?

I mean come on, your bordering on fantasy land half the time.

1) Who on earth really needs more than ~350rwkw for 99% of applications?

2) How is Haltech more advanced?

3) What extra features do i need that are going to aid my daily life?

4) Will it get me more power? More response? More economy? If so, why?

Now, dont base it on hearsay when examples of over 400km/s to a tank & PowerFC are all over the place ;)

You said it yourself, you dont like them, and thats the only reason you are against them because there is nothing majorly factual to justify $800+ price difference.

If the Haltech was the same price as a PowerFC installed/tuned, different story in the bang for buck world.

So now we have established that you just dont like them, can you stop trying to pass off ECU's that are almost the cost of TWO PowerFC's with a minute amount of differences.

In all fairness how many people run an electronic boost controller with a PowerFC? Most other brands have this feature on the ECU, so there's a saving already.

Also enabling different features like shift light, nitrous control, 2 step rev limiter, aftermarket dash compatibility, logging, etc etc. If you buy a PowerFC, EBC and some sort of 2 step rev limiter you're already over the price of a Haltec, and the Haltec isn't limited to that specific model car.

Not trying to play devil's advocate here but have been weighing up a whole bunch of different ECU's for a new car project, and once you look at the electronic management system as a whole it's expensive no matter which road you take, and the more options the better - even if you think you'll never use them down the track you can always start experimenting..

  • Like 1

yeah i have to say i am with DoughBoy. I wanted more features with out the extra moduals all through out my car. The PFC only offered install benifits and more as in dollars for independent component outlay for what i wanted.

Also enabling different features like shift light, nitrous control, 2 step rev limiter, aftermarket dash compatibility, logging, etc etc. If you buy a PowerFC, EBC and some sort of 2 step rev limiter you're already over the price of a Haltec, and the Haltec isn't limited to that specific model car.

Agreed, however it comes down to the intended use.

Its a street car, do you really need those feautres that are only going to attract attention should one be pulled over. Not sure what its like in other states but here in SA if the car even looks to be slightly modified your off for a full inspection.

If I were to often hit the track I would most definitely have choosen a nicer ecu for the car. I just don't have the need for the added features. Hell I've got a PFC handcontroller but it sits in the draw next to the bed.

Honestly, I just drive the car and give it a little stick from time to time. Nothing serious, which explains why it still runs std height suspension.

I have plans for the car in a year so (I have no intention selling, they aren't worth anything) I may see the arse end of the pfc as I'll be dropping something in that has better/quicker datalogging with more features.

So its my opinion for a streeter, you don't need these other features unless your in to rice/hardcore street racer vtec yo and want that shift light reflecting off your face or a launch control system to show how sik your car must be.

On the track or regular at the drags.. its a different story.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...