Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heya, is it possible to use a laptop instead of ecu? If so there would be a hell of a lot of advantages, not to mention it would be cheaper for the equipment and tuning.

Imagine getting a new part installing it, then installing the software that came with the part?

sound possible? I dont know alot about cars so excuse me if its a silleh question.

ta.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131388-laptop-instead-of-ecu/
Share on other sites

If you had the knowledge and resources, sure but the main thing here is how would you feel if your $500 laptop-ecu hybrid that you choose to use failed while driving. Imagine all the R&D that has gone into current ECU's and there is a very good reason why they cost so much.

Interesting idea, but to be honest a dedicated ECU is still the best bet IMHO.

It's designed to do the job, and doesn't have processing overheads like running an operating system (eg Windows, Unix) or background operations that don't directly contribute to the running of the vehicle. Unless the laptop runs full-time, you'd need to wait 10 seconds or more from when you turn the key to the time that things start to work. If data needs to come from the hard drive, there'll be a pause which could be detrimental. You would also need to make your own high-speed interface to send and receive signals on the hundred or so wires going in and out of the computer.

Aftermarket ECUs are already programmable and cheaper than most laptops to buy. Installing software that came with the part is an interesting idea too, though the point of programmable management is that you can tune the fuel and ignition maps to exactly match the characteristics of your engine. The way a certain part affects the optimum tune for your engine depends not just on the part itself, but also on what else is bolted to the engine, the flow characteristics of the intake and exhaust systems, engine wear, etc. Tuning each car individually is still the best way.

Nice idea though :O

Hey,

I don't think you need a hell of a lot of processing power to run a car. Car ecu's are pretty basic as far as mips and speed, compared to todays technology. There really is not a great deal to it, some sensor inputs, calculations, and timing and injectors to control. Some other thing like idle controller etc. No monitor matrixes, or human language to deal with, all binary input and output. Most advances in car computer are in the software.

Besides, I found a list of issues that might happen if you proceeded...(for a laugh)

1. Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you'd have to buy a new car.

2. Occasionally your car would just die on the motorway for no reason, and you'd have to restart it. For some strange reason, you'd just accept this, restart and drive on.

3. Occasionally, executing a manoeuvre would cause your car to stop and fail to restart and you'd have to re-install the engine. For some strange reason, you'd just accept this too.

4. You could only have one person in the car at a time, unless you bought a "Car 95" or a "Car NT". But then you'd have to buy more seats.

5. Apple would make a car that was powered by the sun, was twice as reliable, five times as fast, twice as easy to drive - but it would only run on five percent of the roads.

6. Macintosh car owners would get expensive Microsoft upgrades to their cars which would make their cars go much slower.

7. The oil, engine, gas and alternator warning lights would be replaced with a single "General Car Fault" warning light.

8. People would get excited about the "new" features in Microsoft cars, forgetting completely that they had been available in other cars for many years.

9. We'd all have to switch to Microsoft gas and all auto fluids but the packaging would be superb.

10. New seats would force everyone to have the same size butt.

11. The airbag system would say "Are you sure?" before going off.

12. If you were involved in a crash, you would have no idea what happened.

13. They wouldn't build their own engines, but form a cartel with their engine suppliers. The latest engine would have 16 cylinders, multi-point fuel injection and 4 turbos, but it would be a side-valve design so you could use Model-T Ford parts on it.

14. There would be an "Engium Pro" with bigger turbos, but it would be slower on most existing roads.

15. Microsoft cars would have a special radio/cassette player which would only be able to listen to Microsoft FM, and play Microsoft Cassettes. Unless of course, you buy the upgrade to use existing stuff.

16. Microsoft would do so well, because even though they don't own any roads, all of the road manufacturers would give away Microsoft cars free, including IBM!

17. If you still ran old versions of car (ie. CarDOS 6.22/CarWIN 3.11), then you would be called old fashioned, but you would be able to drive much faster, and on more roads!

18. If you couldn't afford to buy a new car, then you could just borrow your friends, and then copy it.

19. Whenever you bought a car, you would have to reorganise the ignition for a few days before it worked.

20. You would need to buy an upgrade to run cars on a motorway next to each other.

LOL, a few good points.

Of course the program being run via a PC would have no net access so you wont have anything on the laptop other then whats needed. So hopefully no stupid issues. Also the software will take into account what other parts are installed. Would this reduce dyno time by much? never used a dyno before.

Theres idea is more for modifieing cars only. Not trying to sell it to Holden or anything :O

But perhaps a laptop and an ECU and take away some of the features from the ECU leaving it with things like airbags, ABS and all the regular stuff.

Once i get my car i am really going to look into this. If an ECU can be remapped that means the data can be stored, and then transfered to a laptop anyway.

Another issue would be installing a "legit" version of windows... or maybee do it via linux :D

these are just ideas people. SO thanks for your input so far.

Edited by interkool

why is it unreliable? an ECU is a computer without a screen, so It isnt much different.

by the way if you disconect the laptop no one can steal your car. :(

Well i have started to talking to a couple of people about it that can help make this possible. If any one has any helpful ideas, then please PM or add to this Topic.

Thankyou for everything so far.

Edited by interkool

A laptop also has a storage method involving a magnetic head whizzing a few millionths of an inch above a rotating platter. What happens when you hit a couple of solid bumps... your car dies? great! time to call a tow truck.

What interface method do you plan to use between your "laptop ECU" and all the engine sensors?

It's going to cost you more than an aftermarket ECU to make. And it'll be shit. Unless you write your own real-time operating system. Things like injector pulses can't be delayed because windows feels like paging something out to the disk first.

Yeah, but you can get disk on chip... Solid state. Anyway PC ECU, it's not practical.

I think a good idea would be to have a computer giving you all the readouts on a LCD screen installed somwhere in the car, like the dash, or even above the dash and have it reflect off the screen, like a HUD. The pc would plug into the data port of the ecu. When I was at the tuners, he had a diagnostic program that gave you every readout possible, like speed, temp, o2 sensor voltage, MAF voltage, the works! You could almost get rid of all the dials in the dash and use an LCD. I don't know aboout the warning lights though, the ECU may not control all of them, like high beam for instance... But you could also incorporate other things like a reverse camera. Just an idea.

The problem is that I though of this a while ago, and the mercedes make an s class that already has all of this.

damn Jarmans...

>why is it unreliable? have you used a laptop before? do you realise and ECU is a computer without a screen?

er...many of the electronics we use today are, in vague terms, 'computers without screens' (e.g. microwave, dvd recorder etc). but i would much rather trust a dedicated device to handle my car than a laptop ('specially one running something like XP).

>by the way if you disconect the laptop no one can steal your car.

sure they can. flatbed truck.

For a laptop to emulate the code contained within the ecu's specialist chips I think you will find the processing power required is considerable.

Very similiar to that of a mobile phone; try to create software that does what the specialised chips do in a mobile phone and you will need a computer half the size of your bonnet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...