Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just thought I'd pop up a post to counter the inevitable sniping that is happening after our dyno results at Autosalon. The Dyno was run in Shootout Mode which means that all variables and adjustments are locked. 2 other cars (B REAL and Leslie's MX5) ran within 1 or 2% of what they made on SSTs dyno during the week. Bear in mind that figures touted by other tuners for their cars from previous "Salons" were not run in shootout mode and are subject to interpretation.

Jash

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/13143-auto-salon-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

Jash,

I read all the post's in here and I don't think anyone has has a bad thing to say about the result. In fact all of us there were very impressed, even old Jaffey:D

We only have a go at the fact that you can only run 12sec with a 649rwhp car:p

I agree, the dyno results were very close to Steve's dyno and congrats on winning.

See'ya:burnout:

Oh it may not be anyone in here, I just wanted to assure everyone in here that the results were legit, as per usual in Perth there's always someone reckoning we fudged the result.

Hey it was a poorly tuned 500rwhp car when it ran a 12 at 123. something mph :shake: . Will all be fixed with a Holly or some PPG gears and some Nittos.

Jash

Jash,

We know the car should be capable of much more at the plex, and we want to see a GTR take it to some of the V8 brigade.

WE will only bag you if you deserve it:D How much boost were you running, and is there anymore left in the engine at the moment?

See'ya:burnout:

Quite a bit left in it based on how its going now. We just started using VP103 in it and we reckon that there is at least 500rwkw in it. We we're running 1.7 bar which is getting towards the meat of the efficiency for the 3037S. We'll see. Now I've just got to find a Holly sequential for the right money...

Jash

The Dyno was even closer than that, BREAL and MX52NV made within 0.3%.

The runs were in shootout mode and for real.

So that is the highest figure in WA for a GTR and would be 734rwhp at Myaree and upto 800+ on the dynopack and dynojet

dynos. Good on ya Jash for outrite and Paul for the 4cyl crown.

Lets make Shootout mode STD for Shootouts to stop the fudged

figures that DO happen.

Dude,

Ta Dude, nice to meet you all finally - met PVA too.

I'm a sucker for anything with Sparco on it. I also want one of those Superfun Happy baseball bats - I reckon it'd be hilarious to kneecap an intruder with one.

Jash

Amen Hippie,

Shootout Mode is made for a reason and comes with every Dyno Dynamics dyno, if an operator says they havent got it then they are telling porkies. Also worth getting any power runs done in Shootout mode so you can compare with some degree of accuracy.

Jash

Nice work jashy, be nice to see that thing at full boost and power finally, it sat in the shop waiting long enough for it to happen..

bring on the 1k mark and maybe perths first 9 second 4wd pass, might give the eastern states boys something to think about..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...