Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have just done the first test session on semis i felt the car was a little loose in the back end any ideas on how to best make it stick just a little more.

I think that the spring rating maybe just a bit to firm and is picking up the inside rear enough to allow to brake traction.

Any comments will be well recieved. And i will pass the 997 turbo next time i swear.

regards

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/
Share on other sites

Have just done the first test session on semis i felt the car was a little loose in the back end any ideas on how to best make it stick just a little more.

I think that the spring rating maybe just a bit to firm and is picking up the inside rear enough to allow to brake traction.

Any comments will be well recieved. And i will pass the 997 turbo next time i swear.

regards

I need to know a few details before I can really make any meaningful suggestions;

1. Spring rates?

2. Shock brand?

3. Stabiliser bar size?

4. Stabiliser bar settings, if adjustable?

5. Wheel alignment settings?

6. HICAS or not?

7. Engine power?

8. LSD type and condition

That'll do for a start.

:) cheers :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2440746
Share on other sites

I need to know a few details before I can really make any meaningful suggestions;

1. Spring rates?

2. Shock brand?

3. Stabiliser bar size?

4. Stabiliser bar settings, if adjustable?

5. Wheel alignment settings?

6. HICAS or not?

7. Engine power?

8. LSD type and condition

That'll do for a start.

:) cheers :O

Ok in answer to the replies yes i think the rear is far to hard and the spring rate will need to be lowered but i will follow due course as you guys have years more experience with these cars.

1. Hard, :( thats all i know they were on the car when purchased or rescued from scrap yard is a better term.

2. Ohlins all round non adjustable

3. standard front and back

4. N/A

5. Neutral toe settings front and rear, and 1mm neg camber on front and back and no caster adjust as standard items used.

6. Lock bar in use removed the HICAS

7. about 400 hp at fly guess though but would be close.

8. I dont know to be honest be i would assume factory.

Also i need to mention i am running semi's as mentioned but the car was not handle like this on the track day i ran a few months ago. I have installed a 7 point cage ( as mention in another forum ) could this have stiffened the car?

Edited by tacker
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2441108
Share on other sites

As well as the spring rates, you might want to experiment with different turn in points (try later compared to other cars) and get an attesa controller and dial in more front drive than standard (they are pretty taily stock, later models addressed this with more front drive to some extent)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2441430
Share on other sites

Ok i should have been a bit more imformative with my request.

Car was good coming out of corners as there are only 2 second gear corners the rest are either 3rd or one very quick 4th. The car was turning in well but would become loose in the rear mid corner with a nice consistant throttle and not just pushing it straight to the floor. And this was a constant right through out the 4 x 20 minute sessions no matter what lines i tried. I am sure it is either the swaybar or springs or even both. As it was the car was nice and consistant it just needed a bit more rear traction and it would be a much better car to push around a track.

Regards

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2441744
Share on other sites

Ok in answer to the replies yes i think the rear is far to hard and the spring rate will need to be lowered but i will follow due course as you guys have years more experience with these cars.

1. Hard, :rolleyes: thats all i know they were on the car when purchased or rescued from scrap yard is a better term.

2. Ohlins all round non adjustable

3. standard front and back

4. N/A

5. Neutral toe settings front and rear, and 1mm neg camber on front and back and no caster adjust as standard items used.

6. Lock bar in use removed the HICAS

7. about 400 hp at fly guess though but would be close.

8. I dont know to be honest be i would assume factory.

Also i need to mention i am running semi's as mentioned but the car was not handle like this on the track day i ran a few months ago. I have installed a 7 point cage ( as mention in another forum ) could this have stiffened the car?

Suggestions follow;

1. You really need to know the spring rates, this thread shows you how to get the dimensions, then send them to me and I will work out the spring rartes for you.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=79157

2. I have never seen non adjustable Ohlins. Are you sure they are Ohlins? Are you sure that they are non adjustable? No knobs or allen key adjusters on the shock tops?

3 & 4. For regular circuit work you really should look at upgrading to adjustable stabiliser bars, that will enable you to tune the handling balance

5. For regular circuit work you really need around 2.5 to 4.0 degrees negative camber at the front and 1.0 to 2.0 negative camber at the rear. More caster (than standard) is even more essential, do yourself a favour and spend ~$120 and get a caster adjusting kit.

6. Good move

7. That's enough to get some power oversteer

8. OK

On to your observations. For mid corner oversteer, my first guess is the rear spring rate is too high, not unusual for a Japanese kit. Hence why you need to spend a few minutes and get those coil spring dimensions. If you had adjustable stabiliser bars you could have wound on a bit more front bar, that would have overcome the oversteer. Or wound off the rear bar, if it wasn't already at its softest setting.

You could try a little rear toe in, say 2 mm. That will help with the midcorner oversteer, but the downside might be poorer turn in response. It's simply a matter of trying it.

For driving technique, I would try a slightly slower corner entry and then use a little power at mid corner. This gives the front wheels a little torque which tends to pull the car straight. Not large lump of throttle, just a progressive squeeze, which will them give you a higher entry speed to the next straight.

Hope that has been of some help

:thumbsup: cheers :(

Edited by Sydneykid
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2441837
Share on other sites

Cheers SK,

I am just about to get on a plane for Angola ( Lucky huh ) but i will do as you say as soon as i get back into Dubai.

I have read your thread on the sprind rates and i will post them to you ASAP. The shocks are ohlins but i will have to check the allen key bit.

Angain thanks for the help and i will order the castor adjust kit.

Regards

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2442019
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...