Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had a quick read of the Colt turbo in the paper today.

Was a bit disappointed with the 113kw of power, considering a NA Clio Sport (OK it's 2L) is around 130kws and a 2L Golf GTi is around 168 these days.

They talk it up a bit, but for $30k price tag, I would prob get a VW Polo GTi and pocket the $3k saving. I have driven one of these and they are a nice little car. the tartan seats are a bit much for a german car though.

I can't help but think that Mitsubishi are marketing the Colt on the coat tails of their legendary Evo breed. The recaros are nice, but I can't help remembering back to the Colts of the early to mid 80's.

true price is a prohibitive factor in buying a VE, and i say go for it as i love the car. always loved holdens and always will.

but a VE SS is a bit outa my price range, my power limits ( i'm still on P's myself ) and my petrol budget :(

ditto the club spec rexxie.

50's for ss and mid to high 50's for ss v

I had a quick read of the Colt turbo in the paper today.

Was a bit disappointed with the 113kw of power, considering a NA Clio Sport (OK it's 2L) is around 130kws and a 2L Golf GTi is around 168 these days.

They talk it up a bit, but for $30k price tag, I would prob get a VW Polo GTi and pocket the $3k saving. I have driven one of these and they are a nice little car. the tartan seats are a bit much for a german car though.

I can't help but think that Mitsubishi are marketing the Colt on the coat tails of their legendary Evo breed. The recaros are nice, but I can't help remembering back to the Colts of the early to mid 80's.

True the power is lower than most of the other sport hatches but it's running with a half a litre less. and as the rep was saying to me, they are only running low boost through it so it can be bumped an extra few PSI.

and yeah, it's really hard to forget about the 80's colt but i'm trying hard :D

the extra expence in the colt comes from the fact its essentially an A-Class merc chassis, and the engine block itself. only the block is merc tho, the rest of it is all ralliart gear.

50's for ss and mid to high 50's for ss v

your average P plater can't really afford that :)

i'm not saying they are expensive overall, just that they are expensive for some.

I'd take a look at the original Renault Clio sport if you can find one. Great cars, except for the french driving position! Relatively cheap too.

Or even a Clio V6 if you could get one in. Near on 25K pounds new. Not the nicest looking but goes reasonably well.

I'd take a look at the original Renault Clio sport if you can find one. Great cars, except for the french driving position! Relatively cheap too.

You CANNOT find a really comfortable driving position in these as either the pedal distance is nice, but the wheel is too far away, or the opposite.

10/10 for the total package though. The Clio Sport is the best complete package bar none. I have have driven a lot of car hard! Prob lacks a bit on power as I had an R34 GTT, but i have driven many cars that have an engine too powerful for it's chassis (Suzuki Swift GTi is one exmple).

Saff... the V6 Clio is totoally mad. I s aw it last year on Top Gear. Toally impractical. No luggage space. A sellfish purchase, but a REAL weapon!

as long as it's only your employer that is getting ass-raped on the depreciation then go for it :)

Wont matter to me as in 3-5 years I can upgrade to the latest model!!!

Ordered the ignition colour with the ignition colour coded interior, 20's and other bits and other accessories.

Picking it up mid to late next week

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...