Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

pffft... damn repco (RIP EVERY POOR C*NT OFF) i hate them with a passion an they are all the most useless people you could ever deal with if you dont want something for a old bogan mobile VB commodore with a 202

my 2c

Edited by R33_KRAZY
I got mine from Sprint Auto Parts, i've always got good service down there. Within a few minutes we found the right one, they even went out to my car and made sure the connection was right.

Wheres this place and how much did they charge for it eventually? and what brand sensor? cheers...

here you all go, form my other post.

I installed an NGK one last night and a new ECU Temp sensor, WHAT a differance, the car runns %100 better. All up cost $138.

I still have a big fuel smell on startup, but i think my fuel pressure reg is set to high. This only happens when the engine is HOT.

ELO ALL

well i need to replace my 02 sensor, and i did some phoning round. HERE ARE the results.

These O2 are for R33 only,

Repco: have BOSCH 2269013007 about $125

Sparko: ACA OX203 $70 (this may be repcos ROX203 number)

NGK: OZA395-E2 about $100 (same as for SSS N15 pulsar)

Nissan: ask for SSS pulsar N15 O2, cost $240

These are all direct plug and fit no problems. Simply plug and play.

Yet to see if the EL falcon has same resistance and properties to suit. I presume this is the case as the SSS N15 plug is the same 3 wire universal plug found on the EL falcon with a different plug.

IF you are after an EL falcon one

Repco: EL Falcon ROX207

Sparco: ACA OX207

Hope that helps. If i am incorrect please let me know, but this is what i found so far.

UPDATE.

APPARANTLY the EL falcon O2 sensors, all though will work, do not have the same heater resistance and the way the holes are located on the sensor, do not lend themselfs for use in a turbo cr. The NGK plug, has a much smaller area and finned slots instead of holes. This means over time the reading will be all over the show.

Picking mine up tonight, and see how we go.

This information came to me from PETROL-JECT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...