Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

or remap your ECU...

Which is pricey when all you are doing it for is an AFM.

You will then require another remap later down the track and by that time you may as well have bought a pfc.

ECU remaps are only worth it if all mods are done and you will only require 1 tune. If you are doing mods in stages with multiple remaps then the pfc is the only and cheapest way to go.

The absolute cheapest way around it. Grab a second hand SAFC for a couple hundred, wire it in yourself, select 4 (z32) in 2 (std rb) out (from memory) start it and drive it off.

A stock afm is worth around $80-$100. You can use either an R32 or R33 S1 AFM.

Unless you run an safc that converts the signal back to that of what the stock afm would read.

I have a SAFC II, does this mean I can install a z32 AFM ? i always thought u need an aftermarket ecu for this..

Edited by MKDR33
why do you want to change AFMs?

there's no power gain to be had from a z32 AFM...

this i simply don't understand

so you can run more boost, and be able to get over 230-240rwkw.. dont think this can be achieved with the stock afm..

WazR32GTSt

because my stock is stuffed..the car runs like shit sometimes and really nice at other times..

so instead of getting a stock ecu.. i thought it would be better to get a Z32 to power proof it..

Get your old one fixed...its cheaper and less fuss

:D

I have a SAFC II, does this mean I can install a z32 AFM ? i always thought u need an aftermarket ecu for this..

Yes you can run a Z32 with your SAFC. There's an option that allows you to select HW4 IN HW2 OUT. Read the manual its something along those lines.

All this essentially does as I stated before is modify the Z32's afm signal to read what the stock afm would have under those airflow conditions.

So no the Z32 with an SAFC won't allow you to make more power due to having a higher airflow/volt ceiling.

You will need a remap or pfc for that one. :D

Power proof to me means to me; if you have to buy another afm why waste the money on a stock item when you can buy a z32 now and get it working with what you have; later on down the track when you throw a bigger turbo on with an ecu remap or pfc its power proofed. :yes:

Yes you can run a Z32 with your SAFC. There's an option that allows you to select HW4 IN HW2 OUT. Read the manual its something along those lines.

All this essentially does as I stated before is modify the Z32's afm signal to read what the stock afm would have under those airflow conditions.

So no the Z32 with an SAFC won't allow you to make more power due to having a higher airflow/volt ceiling.

You will need a remap or pfc for that one. :(

im aware that i wont get anymore power, the reason id get one is to resolve my fuel cut issue with the stock afm.. i cant boost any higher then 16psi..

Edited by MKDR33
im aware that i wont get anymore power, the reason id get one is to resolve my fuel cut issue with the stock afm.. i cant boost any higher then 16psi..

*sighs*

Have another read of my post. If you are getting a fuel cut issue with the stock afm the Z32 isn't going to do sh*t IF you don't remap the ecu or run a PFC/aftermarket ecu.

As I said... The SAFC.

HW4 IN (Z32)

Convert to

HW2 OUT (RB AFM)

This essentially modifies the signal back to what it would read at that airflow level with the stock afm. SO you WILL NOT get around the fuel cut issue at 16psi.

*sighs*

Have another read of my post. If you are getting a fuel cut issue with the stock afm the Z32 isn't going to do sh*t IF you don't remap the ecu or run a PFC/aftermarket ecu.

As I said... The SAFC.

HW4 IN (Z32)

Convert to

HW2 OUT (RB AFM)

This essentially modifies the signal back to what it would read at that airflow level with the stock afm. SO you WILL NOT get around the fuel cut issue at 16psi.

ive been told by a tuner that i can get around it with the SAFC II, this is why i was asking..

Poviding there is enough scope you could set the afm to HW2 IN HW2 Out. This won't manipulate the afm's signal and cause the car to run mega lean across the board.

IF you were to richen it up via the safc it may give you a tad more head room but do remember as you use lesser load points the ign. values used are also higher. As a result its a receipt for detonation and a broken motor.

If you do go ahead with this be sure to throw it on the dyno when summer hits to ensure its not detonating as it will be very very close to the edge of detonation.

I wasn't going to mention you could do this and put the idea in to ppls heads as its a very bodgy way to squeeze a little more power out of the stock ecu. I believe this method to squeeze a little more out of their stock ecu has been covered some time ago. I also believe the bloke had rather dissapointing results. But its all setup dependant.

No doubt if you were to fit up an ITC and an adj. fuel pressure some decent gains could be made.

For the sake of slightly under $1000 for a pfc is it really worth the risk.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...