Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes, find somone with the same car with zero missfire problems. then raid their set-up for their coil pack loom. it's only a short piece, easy to swap. make sure you just change 1 thing at a time, so start with your orig set-up. then try loom. then try coil packs, then ignitor etc. also i'd suggest if you are running more boost than stock or plan to go for BCPR7ES (they come gapped at 0.8mm) as they are one heat range cooler.

can anyone tell me if letting the ignitor just hang without being attached anywhere is ok?

Its a pain putting and removing the the center valve cover.

Ive heard of a couple of guys here whove killed a ignitor from letting it just hang there....

  • 3 weeks later...

i will bring a old thread up as i dont want to start another thread on splitfires etc

my problem is that my r33 miss fires from around 4800? thru to 7000rpm im guessing as the vct kicks in it starts miss firing mods are

stage3 slidingperformance hiflow

intercooler

3" from turbo no cat

walbro fuel pump

now ive only had the hiflow for about 3 days now,and since bolting it on it miss fires on all boost settings including stock 7psi, before with stock turbo it would only do it anything above 7psi so i could run stock 7psi wen it would carry on and could rev it cleanly... i was using .8 gap on my plugs so yesterday i explored and regapped the plugs to .6 they are a ngk plug heat range 7...now this has fixed all my miss fire problems runs like a dream on 7 thru to 13psi

now if since i regapped to .6 it fixed my miss wat was the weak link before that? coils? stock ecu? ive ordered splitfires thru sliding they sould be here within the week,im not fussed if they were my problem but i wanted to get them anyway b4 powerfc so ive got it all sorted b4 it goes for a tune..so have any of u guys got a clue as to why .6 gap runs perfect and .8 gap onwards it misses terribly.

sydneykid give me some info! u seem 2 be the man around here lol

Justin

Edited by l0WRB
i will bring a old thread up as i dont want to start another thread on splitfires etc

my problem is that my r33 miss fires from around 4800? thru to 7000rpm im guessing as the vct kicks in it starts miss firing mods are

stage3 slidingperformance hiflow

intercooler

3" from turbo no cat

walbro fuel pump

now ive only had the hiflow for about 3 days now,and since bolting it on it miss fires on all boost settings including stock 7psi, before with stock turbo it would only do it anything above 7psi so i could run stock 7psi wen it would carry on and could rev it cleanly... i was using .8 gap on my plugs so yesterday i explored and regapped the plugs to .6 they are a ngk plug heat range 7...now this has fixed all my miss fire problems runs like a dream on 7 thru to 13psi

now if since i regapped to .6 it fixed my miss wat was the weak link before that? coils? stock ecu? ive ordered splitfires thru sliding they sould be here within the week,im not fussed if they were my problem but i wanted to get them anyway b4 powerfc so ive got it all sorted b4 it goes for a tune..so have any of u guys got a clue as to why .6 gap runs perfect and .8 gap onwards it misses terribly.

sydneykid give me some info! u seem 2 be the man around here lol

Justin

.6 means less of a gap to jump for the spark, like when the coils are worn etc, on healthy coils you can put the gap back up!

same issue i had!

I would have tested the coil packs first...

there is a thing in DIY about it if i recall.

well would stock coils handle 250rwkw i wasn't sure if they would so thats why i wanted to upgrade the coils its only $600

well would stock coils handle 250rwkw i wasn't sure if they would so thats why i wanted to upgrade the coils its only $600

stock coils fine a 250rwkw-will be fine for alot more power to as long as they are in good nick- I changed mine at 300rwkw

whilst at the Veilside workshop earlier this year I was poking around their 7 second, over 1000hp R32 GTR... guess what. standard coils. not sure if they run them all the time, but it was definately using them whilst I was there.

like mr660hp said. the coils are great providing they are in tip top shape which after 10 or so years in a hot engine they generally are not in good shape.

whilst at the Veilside workshop earlier this year I was poking around their 7 second, over 1000hp R32 GTR... guess what. standard coils. not sure if they run them all the time, but it was definately using them whilst I was there.

like mr660hp said. the coils are great providing they are in tip top shape which after 10 or so years in a hot engine they generally are not in good shape.

thats probably the main reason i changed mine as mine are in 1993 r33 and are gettin old and would only cause the miss fire after they heat up!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...