Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The event is closing in fast. I'll get the groups organised and posted up on the site soon as well. Plus I want to try and get a remote computer in pit bay 1 with the lap times and best laps on it for the drivers and my big sign showing the trap speeds live for the 'audience'. Bit more tech for the day.

The shoot-out is gearing up as well with $110 prize for the morning and $100 for the afternoon shootouts so far. Can't wait to see how that event goes.

Also did everyone notice I have made the start time 1/2 hour earlier. We have a huge day planned so I want to get it 'live' early.

Paul

PS: If anyone wants to order a T-Shirt I have now got them all at my place. I've got some XXXL as well in white and black for those who asked. Just send me a PM.

Edited by MountainRunner
Its like 30 sleeps...

Im no closer to 350rwkw than last week... :wave:

My injectors still have not arrived... :wave:

But ill be ready for trackday... Otherwise ill take the rodeo out... :devil:

haha thats awesome. i've been so tempted lately to buy a big hks turbo so its ready for the track day but i've decided to do the right thing and keep my money to pay off my debt. It's all so tempting tho

Yeah Paul ive put old yellow back together...

Im gonna run on my high flow turbo, the brakes and clutch are in and im begining the bed in process. Now the clutch is actually holding i made 246rwkw @16psi. So ill be running an extra 40rwkw for this next event.

Lets see how the lap times are affected by better brakes and an extra 40kw...

I would put the GT30 on but i think ill run out of time to get it all done...

just start today. Youll have enough time.... come on, you know u wanna :pirate: lol

Nah ill be down the gold coast next week and then down in sydney the week after that and then back to Brisbane just in time for trackday...

No time i tell ya...

Track day line-up:

http://www.timeattack.com.au/updates/driver_lineup.htm

Track day format:

http://www.timeattack.com.au/coming_trackday.php

The day is booked out, but anyone who wants to come out and watch is most welcome.

B.B.Q.

Hey guys, mrbenno and I (and other members) were discussing a SAU fund raiser BBQ lunch at track day. But it seems we are short of people (and possibly a BBQ) to run the lunch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...