Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Isn't the different noise experienced by the rb20 as opposed to the rb25 due to injector positioning? Not really sure, just thought i read that somewhere and i also remember reading in the HPI magazines during their rb24 build up that they thought the rb24 had a little more torque than a standard rb25.

If your willing to pay some extra money and encounter a few problmes along the way then go the rb24 and you will end up with a pretty cool engine setup that looks stock but has a little more low-down go but it would be alot easier and cheaper to just go the 25.

Isn't the different noise experienced by the rb20 as opposed to the rb25 due to injector positioning? Not really sure, just thought i read that somewhere and i also remember reading in the HPI magazines during their rb24 build up that they thought the rb24 had a little more torque than a standard rb25.

If your willing to pay some extra money and encounter a few problmes along the way then go the rb24 and you will end up with a pretty cool engine setup that looks stock but has a little more low-down go but it would be alot easier and cheaper to just go the 25.

I doubt the injector positioning would make the noise difference. I think it would be a number of things like the different compression, different cams specs, valves and bigger ports etc. As for the rb24 having more toque it is possible i guess as it would have a slightly bigger stroke than the rb25 but i would think it was due to a better tune .

If the intention was to build a new motor anyway then the rb24 would be the way to go.

I think if i was gonna go a rebuild I think the rb22 would be the way I go.

Personal pref i guess. :laugh:

Isn't the different noise experienced by the rb20 as opposed to the rb25 due to injector positioning? Not really sure, just thought i read that somewhere and i also remember reading in the HPI magazines during their rb24 build up that they thought the rb24 had a little more torque than a standard rb25.

If your willing to pay some extra money and encounter a few problmes along the way then go the rb24 and you will end up with a pretty cool engine setup that looks stock but has a little more low-down go but it would be alot easier and cheaper to just go the 25.

Was their comparison between an RB25DET in an R32 to the RB24 in an R32 or an RB25DET in an R33 vs the RB24 in the R32. If the latter its possible the rb24 will feel as if it has more torque as the R32 is both lighter and runs a lower diff ratio.

The other possibility is that the R32 inlet runners and ports are considerably smaller than the RB25's, increasing velocity at low engine speed, this too improves low down torque but creates a greater restriction at higher airflow levels.

------------

You would still want to rebuild an RB25DE though wouldnt you? Ppl have problems with the valvesprings in them dont they when they turbo them?

Also what compression do they run, and are the pistons any good, or are the ring lands pretty pissy like std RB25 pitsons?

Think it could work well, but i dont think its a better option then throwing in a std RB25DET.

If you are going to rebuld an RB20, i still think some custom pistons for an 82mm bore, std rods and crank with a clean up of the combustion chambers and ports....would be a pretty decent thing for not too many dollars.

I still think a std RB25 is a pretty strong thing and ppl prematurely open them up. So if you only want a punchy streetable engine then it does take some beating...but does cost a few dollars to do. Especially sinc if i was doing an engine change i would put a new water and oil pump in. New timign belt and idler/tensioner bearings. New belts on the front of the motor...it all adds to the cost of an engine swap. Hell even engine oil, coolant and air con re-gas woudl set you back a few hundred...things to consider if your thinking about swapping out the RB20

i have driven a cefiro that sported a HKS built RB24 and i am pleased to report that these motors are infinately more torquey than a stock RB25. This is in my opinion, largely to do with the small port/valve size creating high intake velocity.

The motor was noticably bad about 6000 where it trailed off in power.

Building a 2.4 would be great fun, but how easy is it to find good, cheap virgin rb26 cranks?

My rb24 doesnt tend to trail off after 6k, infact it feels like the 7.5k limiter is cutting its lunch, and thats with stock cams, ports, and gears. once theres some cams in the mix it'll be a weapon!

personally i think the 24 is well worth it, sure it'll cost you 5k+ to do it properly but you'll have no problems after that if the tune is sweet. i've owned a 31 with a stock rb20 and my hr31 with the rb24 and 2871r and the 24 has more power everywhere, better to drive around town and just generally better behaved (especially since i change the leaking HG :D ). can't comment on a 25 though, never stepped over to the dark side.. :D

Oh and you definately cant beat the sound of a 24 at full revs! especially with a good exh manifold, the HKS one sounds awsome but the Trust high mount gave me a horse stiffy everytime i wound it out.

;)

Edited by kwazza11
You would still want to rebuild an RB25DE though wouldnt you? Ppl have problems with the valvesprings in them dont they when they turbo them?

Also what compression do they run, and are the pistons any good, or are the ring lands pretty pissy like std RB25 pitsons?

Think it could work well, but i dont think its a better option then throwing in a std RB25DET.

If you are going to rebuld an RB20, i still think some custom pistons for an 82mm bore, std rods and crank with a clean up of the combustion chambers and ports....would be a pretty decent thing for not too many dollars.

I still think a std RB25 is a pretty strong thing and ppl prematurely open them up. So if you only want a punchy streetable engine then it does take some beating...but does cost a few dollars to do. Especially sinc if i was doing an engine change i would put a new water and oil pump in. New timign belt and idler/tensioner bearings. New belts on the front of the motor...it all adds to the cost of an engine swap. Hell even engine oil, coolant and air con re-gas woudl set you back a few hundred...things to consider if your thinking about swapping out the RB20

When I origionally suggested the rb25de route I said one would have to change pistons, and yes valve springs will also need to be replaced with a $200-$300 set of GTR springs. Forgot about that one... ;)

Its a little bit of the its a fresh motor or a second hand motor.... By all means the second hand motors do appear to be not too bad but personally I'd prefer a fresh motor and it shouldn't cost you more than 1k over the purchase price of a s/h rb25det.

I didn't reuse headstuds. They weren't terribly expensive but as you say... Where does one stop. :D

Stick with the rb20 and ram boost in to it I say.. When it pops throw another $500 RB20 in.

Rebuilding motors I worry about popping it. $500 cheap rb20 who cares, hammer it enjoy it. :mellow:

haha yeah stuff the rebuild..spend the money on 8 rb20's and just hit the track!

I am definately going to rebuild my rb20 and bump it out to a 22 or 24 when the time comes because the dark side is a place i never want to go to :rofl:

It came with that engine so i wanna keep it and see what it is capable of. Obviously there are other ways that will make much more power but im not after a 10sec car etc. just something fun and a bit different.

Awesome replys guys, I assumed $5k+ for a forged 2.4 setup, Ive already got cooler, pod, injectors, wolf3d ecu, full exhaust with dump pipe and fuel pump, so I figured stroke and turbo should see me close to those figures with little fuss?

  • 3 weeks later...

im thinking of going with the 24 as well but i want to use the 25 block out ov a r33 with variable valve timing and then the 2 litre crank and forged 2litre cons this chould give me a ridiculously high redline and a free revving tourquey engine the exact capacity will be 2429 with this combination

im thinking of going with the 24 as well but i want to use the 25 block out ov a r33 with variable valve timing and then the 2 litre crank and forged 2litre cons this chould give me a ridiculously high redline and a free revving tourquey engine the exact capacity will be 2429 with this combination

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, it's getting like that, my daughter is coming over on Thursday to help me remove the bonnet so I can install the Carbuilders underbonnet stuff,  I might get her to give me a hand and remove the hardtop, maybe, because on really hot days the detachable hardtop helps the aircon keep the interior cool, the heat just punches straight through to rag top I also don't have enough hair for the "wind in the hair" experience, so there is that....LOL
    • Could be falling edge/rising edge is set wrong. Are you getting sync errors?
    • On BMWs what I do because I'm more confident that I can't instantly crush the pinch welds and do thousands of USD in chassis damage is use a set of rubber jacking pads designed to protect the chassis/plastic adapter and raise a corner of the car, place the aforementioned 2x12 inch wooden planks under a tire, drop the car, then this normally gives me enough clearance to get to the front central jack point. If you don't need it to be a ramp it only needs to be 1-1.5 feet long. On my R33 I do not trust the pinch welds to tolerate any of this so I drive up on the ramps. Before then when I had to get a new floor jack that no longer cleared the front lip I removed it to get enough clearance to put the jack under it. Once you're on the ramps once you simply never let the car down to the ground. It lives on the ramps or on jack stands.
    • Nah. You need 2x taps for anything that you cannot pass the tap all the way through. And even then, there's a point in response to the above which I will come back to. The 2x taps are 1x tapered for starting, and 1x plug tap for working to the bottom of blind holes. That block's port is effectively a blind hole from the perspective of the tap. The tapered tap/tapered thread response. You don't ever leave a female hole tapered. They are supposed to be parallel, hence the wide section of a tapered tap being parallel, the existince of plug taps, etc. The male is tapered so that it will eventually get too fat for the female thread, and yes, there is some risk if the tapped length of the female hole doesn't offer enough threads, that it will not lock up very nicely. But you can always buzz off the extra length on the male thread, and the tape is very good at adding bulk to the joint.
    • Nice....looking forward to that update
×
×
  • Create New...