Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

here's a thought... what about a stock GTST exhaust...

they are a 2.5" exhaust standard, and should have the exact same measurements as an NA one... only thing you might need to get made up may be a replacement as to the headers instead of front pipe..

i'm currently looking into this option. its also cheap =)

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

for that stealth look but trying to get some more power, stick with the stock cat-back.

after all, its an NA car and won't respond to exhaust mods like a turbocharged car

that one of the dumbest things i have ever heard. i changed the cat back on my old magna and it made it a complete different car to drive. much more response, and much more top end.

and did full engine back exhaust and it resulted in about a 20% gain in power. on the stock exhaust it would choke at about 5500rpm, now it revs nicely up to the 7500rpm.

so you have dyno results to proce this 20% power claim?

i had an MA70 supra 3L non-turbo

went from stock to aftermarket exhaust and hardly noticed a difference

on my R32 turbo, noticed a HUGE difference as shown by an increase from 106rwkw to 132rwkw from exhaust and timing change

if its "one of the dumbest things you've ever heard" then you must have your head in the sand

yes an NA car will get more power with an xhaust but its won't givve the same power gains that you will get with a turbocharged car

So you have dyno results to prove this 20% power claim?

I had an MA70 supra 3L non-turbo

Went from stock to aftermarket exhaust and hardly noticed a difference

On my R32 turbo, noticed a HUGE difference as shown by an increase from 106rwkw to 132rwkw from exhaust and timing change

If its "one of the dumbest things you've ever heard" then you must have your head in the sand

Yes an NA car will get more power with an exhaust but it’s won't give the same power gains that you will get with a turbocharged car

That is true, turbo's will respond to exhausts more, with increases in power and with less lag etc. But an exhaust is one of the best things you can do for a lot of N/A cars (maybe not the supra then, though I wouldn’t know). I know on my skyline, from the factory 2" exhaust with 1 muffler (other one previously cut off) to a 2.5" PRESS BENT (though its a f**king good job) with a muffler and a resonator, my car (auto) was completely different to drive, rev's quicker, gained a little low-midrange, and heaps of top end (where before it died in the arse after ~ 5000rpm) it loves it to the limiter.

Maybe a compromise, with the stock exhaust with mufflers changed??

You could always paint your exhaust black (or charcoal mixed with brown ha-ha) as long as you have a standard muffler on it (i.e. no f**king cannon) cops wont notice or care. Its quiet, it looks normal, be it a little oversize but they wont know that, and if they do, its the same difference between putting a stock turbo exhaust onto it, its still bigger...

really though, they cant stop you from replacing your exhaust, exhausts don’t last forever, they need to be done, it was already on the care and since its sound you assumed it was stock!?

I really can’t see 99.999% of cops caring about a stock looking exhaust, esp. one without a tip (not that they can do anything about that)

Its really up to the driver, rules are meant to be broken, it's just up to you to decide if its worth the risk, and at the same time, if your cars quiet and you drive sensibly (esp. in a stockish looking car) I cant see you getting pulled over or harassed at all...

though I am in Tassie and its different than some of your police states, we're still fairly strict, I have a LOUD throaty exhaust (but you only hear it when the foot goes down) way darker than legal tint, lowered, with stock wheels, polished to a mirror, I keep my car clean, and im constantly on the lookout for anything and generally drive fairly softly (but we all have our days/moments).

And even when they see my car cruise past with nothing but a throb (I always spot them first and easy off) I never get any attention. But at the same time, if I got caught being stupid, im sure I would be pretty f**ked...

Edited by SKiT_R31

I've got a full CES custom job, looks as stock as a rock with twin tips and is good for 250rwkw....you've got to bend right up under the car to see it's a full 3" and well pushed up into every crevice to keep it out of sight. You get what you pay for with an exhaust, I'd definately go custom in the future as you just don't get the unwanted attention.

Picture.jpg

WazR32GTSt, this is for you, what sort of exausht did u put on your N/A skyline to add 30kw at the wheels???

i said "exhaust + timing"

i went from having severely retarted timing and stock exhaust to having 3" dump/front and 3" cat-back (Stock cat). also fixed up the timing back to normal 20deg BTDC for the auto ECU

that took me from 106rwkw to 132rwkw

ahh ok, well it its quite possible to get a N/A to 170kw @ wheels.

an NA V8 maybe.. not an NA 6

best i've seen is a mate of mine with an NA 300zx who has 155rwkw with a hell of a lot of mods...

as said above, i've got an rb20det for my 170rwkw with FMIC, 3" exhaust, 14psi, rb25 turbo, cams+gears (as far as engine mods go anyway)

its possible, trust me, get a r33, r32 what eva but the 2.5L throw on...exausht, extractors, CAI with pod, upgraded cams, throtle body, lightemd fly wheel, clutch and aftermarket ECU Tuned to all the mods.

that should give around 130 @ wheels minium, plsy u can always throw on 75HP of giggle gas on it, and that would throw it up, way up ^_^

its possible, trust me, get a r33, r32 what eva but the 2.5L throw on...exausht, extractors, CAI with pod, upgraded cams, throtle body, lightemd fly wheel, clutch and aftermarket ECU Tuned to all the mods.

that should give around 130 @ wheels minium, plsy u can always throw on 75HP of giggle gas on it, and that would throw it up, way up ^_^

it is easy possible to even get more than that... for instance, i know of a few bloody buick V67's (hardly a performance engine) that are pushin around 180RWKW...

look at engines like the L28 etc...

or for example what im looking at building up (after new job and loan clears). I dont know hows its going to turn out, but im aiming for ~ 150-160RWKW...

wont go into too much of the details of it, but im aiming for ~ 11.5:1/12:1 CR (depending on what 98ron BP ultimate can handle) RB25 VVT head on RB30 Block, maximum head porting and polish, matched intake plenum/runners, custom exaust/extractors, Stock cam, and aftermarket ECU with custom dyno tune. Usual lightweight gear (not sure how far ill go) Flywheel, lightweight single piece tailshaft, dont know about pistons - not keen on the rattle, etc.

i mean there will be a bit more to it than that, but thats the gist of things... if it doesnt make 150RWKW ill be surprised and its not really that serious of a build, heaps of daily drivability and response, nice economy when driven mild etc... Though im not soo much aiming for peak power, more for heaps of power/torque through the rev range, dont want to have to rev it too hard to make power (after reliability). - the point is, if i was to expand on that, i could easily pull a few more kw's out of it...

imo anything under 200RWKW isnt unrealistic when it comes to an N/A 6 cyl, it can be done and has been done many times, you just need the time, patiency, low blood pressure and $$$.

Once you start getting over 200RWKW you are dreaming a bit, or you are one rich muf*kr

Edited by SKiT_R31

skit_r31 sounds like a v.good build.. will be impressive to see how that goes.

some possible improvements may be an RB26 head with hex throttle bodies, and instead of forged pistons look into those hypereutic ones...

in terms of power i agree that realistically something around the 130-170rwkw is achieveable without nitrous, anything after that and you'll start looking at a higher rev limit and big dollars

my mate with the NA zed has a heavily modified machine..

head ported + polished

extractors

twin cats and twin exhaust

pod

larger intake pipes

larger throttle bodies (there's 2 of of them also...)

unichip

and more but i don't remember what else

155rwkw (manual trans)

that's a pretty decently modified NA machine..

all that's really left to do would be cams / gears which at best could see 170-180rwkw

and that's a 3L engine, not a 2.5L like the rb25de.. 500cc makes a huge difference

You can get a shift kit to make it a bit less sloppy on gear-change.

Decent exhaust, porting and cams...maybe something like the new e-manage ultimate to trim the fuel and increase timing and raise the rev limit.

They are NA, they wouldnt need half the things you mentioned. Also losing a lisence should be a lesson not to speed in the first place, wait until you get off your Ps, get a turbo and then start modding.

I dont like being a father figure here but it needed to be said

PS modding an NA skyline for speed is like trying to make a fat chick a ballerina...

PS modding an NA skyline for speed is like trying to make a fat chick a ballerina...

bang for buck wise that may be true, but a few of the people here myself included are simply trying to build a well balanced driveable car that handles well, and has slightly more power than standard whilst maintaining reliability and keeping maintenance costs down.

you are never going to make big power or fast 1/4 mile times with an NA (in reference to a GTST), nor are you going to make big power with a GTST (in reference to lets say a GTR), nor a GTR (lets exaggerate and say a Zonda).

and while your points may be valid and true, NA cars are the base people choose have and want to work with. what i'm saying is that i'm sure most people here know about the futility of making big HP with NA cars and dont need someone telling them otherwise... and that is as a polite f**k off as you'll ever get.

also keep in mind that some of the faster cars around a track are NA, so while the fat chick cant do ballet, i'm sure she can try and do just as well.

p.s - i do not condone fat chicks.

bang for buck wise that may be true, but a few of the people here myself included are simply trying to build a well balanced driveable car that handles well, and has slightly more power than standard whilst maintaining reliability and keeping maintenance costs down.

you are never going to make big power or fast 1/4 mile times with an NA (in reference to a GTST), nor are you going to make big power with a GTST (in reference to lets say a GTR), nor a GTR (lets exaggerate and say a Zonda).

and while your points may be valid and true, NA cars are the base people choose have and want to work with. what i'm saying is that i'm sure most people here know about the futility of making big HP with NA cars and dont need someone telling them otherwise... and that is as a polite f**k off as you'll ever get.

also keep in mind that some of the faster cars around a track are NA, so while the fat chick cant do ballet, i'm sure she can try and do just as well.

p.s - i do not condone fat chicks.

GOLD

its possible, trust me, get a r33, r32 what eva but the 2.5L throw on...exausht, extractors, CAI with pod, upgraded cams, throtle body, lightemd fly wheel, clutch and aftermarket ECU Tuned to all the mods.

that should give around 130 @ wheels minium, plsy u can always throw on 75HP of giggle gas on it, and that would throw it up, way up ^_^

But really why bother.. The loud exhaust note etc.. Is it really worth 130rwkw. 130rwkw is still damn slow and quite boaring.

Id simply fit up an exhaust from a turbo model, do the cam gears, pod with a nice cai and partition then tuned to suit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...