Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have searched, and looked through EVERY page of the turbo results thread for rb26 and rb30 and cant find anyone that has used this configuration.

Found plenty of 2530's but no 2510's, wondering if anyone has had experience with this setup or knows of anyone who has. Interested to know how much power this setup would be capable of and also when it would start making boost and hit full boost.

Ive seen these turbo's used with great results on SR20's as a single setup, with insane response and a healthy power figure to boot. Wondering what 2 would be like on a slightly higher capacity engine with work. Basically looking to maintain a healthy power figure 450 - 500hp+ whilst increasing response, currently hitting full boost around 4000rpm.

Turbo Specs:

300PS Output

COMPRESSOR:

-Wheel- 63 Trim - 47.7 Inducer / 60.1 Major

-Housing- 60 Inlet / 50 Outlet - 0.60 A/R

TURBINE:

-Wheel- 62 Trim - 53.0 Major / 41.7 Exducer

-Housing- GT25 inlet / Internal GT25 oulet - 0.64 A/R

If someone with experience would like to hazard an educated guess based on the specs provided that would be lovely I just dont trust my judgement in estimating these figures. Plus im biased and think he should stick with a big single and just go to something with a newer design.

Might also help to know the engine is 500+hp on a big single at the moment (trust turbo of some description although its a bit old, pretty sure its plain bearing too) stage 3 hks cams 275 deg duration, plenty of head work (polished, port matched, aftermarket valves, retainers etc), built bottom end (pistons, rods, bearings etc) and all the goodies you would expect to find on a car of this nature. (btw posting on behalf of a friend)

Thanks in advance - James.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/136354-rb26-twin-hks-2510s/
Share on other sites

Firstly I'm not sure if you have those 2510's or by the "he" you are talking about someone else .

HKS's GT2510 have been around for ages and ideas on matching compressors to turbines has changed . A 2510 is basically a 2530 with the less pereformance biased version of the two available GT25/28 turbines . Its obvious they wanted a lower boost threshold out of them (compared to 2530) so opted for the slightly smaller turbine which from memory has more blades and less open blades than the other option .

If I was buying responsive turbos for an RB26 HKS's later GT-SS turbos do a better job IMO so do a search on those ones . There are also other turbos such as a few garrett variations along similar lines . I think WilliamsF1 here got really good results with them (GT-SS's) and bags of mid range torque from an RB26 .

My personal very biased opinion on that engine is single turbo if starting with a clean sheet , I thinks turbos have (and are still being) developed that give little away to twins but all the support systems have to be good . There probably comes a time for very extreme power outputs where its almost impossible to fit one turbo and close the lid but the vast majority of people will never do this .

I really hope the single/twin feud is not going to erupt again as everyone is welcome to their own opinion .

Cheers A .

2510's are rather old skool. Similiar or slightly better in spoolup to 2530 but without the power. The turbine to compressor match reflects the age of these units. R34N1 or GT-SS will make more power with substantially better spool up and transient response. 2530/2560-5 will have similiar response but with much greater power due to higher flowing turbine.

cheers.

B.

I have done one R33. I think there great turbos....its pretty similar to GTSS

So far on stock motor with metal head gasket and stock fuel system, we have hit the limit to 300kw @ 4wheels. I should have the dyno sheet, which will show the boost.

That dyno sheet would be greatly appreciated if you can hunt it down mate.

And thankyou to the others for your responses too, so basically a pair of 2530/GTSS's is going to offer similar if not better response with a higher ceiling for total power output?

I was under the impression the 2510's would spool a lot earlier than the 2530 due to the difference in design as noted in one of your replies. Even being the earlier design, if they are better responsively and will offer a peak power output around the target area, which based on the quoted power output in the above statement they certainly will, I would still really consider them as response is a BIG factor in the change... if its going to be negligible then my biased opinion is probably correct, stick with the big single.

Looking at dyno graphs in the RB26 turbo results thread of twin 2530's, some come on even later than the big single setup thats currently on the car which hits at 4000rpm as opposed to a lot of those graphs showing 4500rpm with a greater peak power output (around 380rwkw as it sits, note rear wheel not all wheel, this engine is in a gtst).

Further confirmation would be great :happy: and that dyno graph will certainly put my mind at ease if you can dig it up.

Cheers

James.

Dont confuse GT-SS and 2530's.

If you read RPMGTR's post its clear. :happy:

The GT-SS are smaller than the 2530's, and give better response than 2530s, less outright power.

There are a number of GT-SS graphs about these forums, and its such a meaty midrange.

You said 500hp, 370kw, thats around 300-330rwkw, and thats smack in the GT-SS/34-N1 range.

If you want more, then its the 2530/2560-5's for you

Dont confuse GT-SS and 2530's.

If you read RPMGTR's post its clear. :happy:

The GT-SS are smaller than the 2530's, and give better response than 2530s, less outright power.

There are a number of GT-SS graphs about these forums, and its such a meaty midrange.

You said 500hp, 370kw, thats around 300-330rwkw, and thats smack in the GT-SS/34-N1 range.

If you want more, then its the 2530/2560-5's for you

Oh sorry I wasnt saying they were the same i was saying "either" of those setups. I'll go hunting for some GT-SS graphs now, still wouldnt mind grabbing the 2510 graph though, just for interests and comparisons sake.

Dude what do you want to do with this car?

I went in a 32gts with a light tuned rb26 stock turbo's only about 250rwkw, and the car was a beast on the street. You have 380rwkw now, how do you drive that seriously!? Im presuming you track it, or are just a nut to have that much power in a little RWD 32 gts!! :)

oh ive also heard that for GTR the GT-SS's are a really awesome choice. But 4WD is pretty different to RWD! On a track with some track tyres it'd be a blast.. on the street, you'd think it would smoke the bags all through 3rd!

Edited by SLY33
Dude what do you want to do with this car?

I went in a 32gts with a light tuned rb26 stock turbo's only about 250rwkw, and the car was a beast on the street. You have 380rwkw now, how do you drive that seriously!? Im presuming you track it, or are just a nut to have that much power in a little RWD 32 gts!! :)

oh ive also heard that for GTR the GT-SS's are a really awesome choice. But 4WD is pretty different to RWD! On a track with some track tyres it'd be a blast.. on the street, you'd think it would smoke the bags all through 3rd!

I currently run around the same power in my 32 GTST with a trust built rb25det and a big single... its not that bad, spinning through 4th isnt such a bad thing since we are both drifters :( just exploring opportunities to increase response without sacrificing peak power. Hell if all goes well on the RB26 I might even look at doing an RB25DETT for shits n giggles seeing as though everything else is just about done now.

Just gonna wait on these dyno graphs of the 2510's do a bit more research and comparison, make a decision and get it all under way.

Given a choise the GT-SS's will do a far better job than 2510's . There was a lot more in the way of GT25/28 bits for HKS to play with when they specced the SS's . Definitely more suited to RB26's characteristics and drive experience nicer in a short rod shortish stroke engine thats designed to breath and rev . As I said talk to WilliamsF1 . Great long string and fantastic result .

Cheers A .

Given a choise the GT-SS's will do a far better job than 2510's . There was a lot more in the way of GT25/28 bits for HKS to play with when they specced the SS's . Definitely more suited to RB26's characteristics and drive experience nicer in a short rod shortish stroke engine thats designed to breath and rev . As I said talk to WilliamsF1 . Great long string and fantastic result .

Cheers A .

I have a set of the GT-SS's on my GTR. They are absolutely awesome!! The power is almost instant, and when it comes on, its bloody scary, hehe. They actually come on at about the same as the stocko's if not quicker due to the ball bearing ( more likely to do with my manifolds which i port matched and flowed, and the split dumps) cores and newer more efficient design.

On a crap tune they are putting out 270kw at all four on 21psi of boost, but after matty spry retunes it on tuesday, it should be more like 310kw at the wheels. As it is now though, on a damp on ramp to the M1 the other night, it managed to have all 4 spinning in 3rd which was scary as hell, hahah. It did track very straight though thanks to the 4wd.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...