Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some people say they are ok but some say they are defectable. Is anyone 100% sure if they are or not or has anyone been defected for theirs b4? Also r boost controllers leagal?

boost controllers are illegal in south australia. i had to take mine off to get it through regency.

i am under the understanding that you can have 1 inlet modification ie one fmic or one pod filter not both it's one or the other ive just fitted a fmic to mine and am now in the prosess of modifiying my snorkel to clear the pipes so i can use the standed airbox with a panel filter .boos contorollers have always been a no no but depending on what copper ya got at the time same with turbo timers .hope this helps some

cheers mid life crisis

In SA you can have both an FMIC and POD. Its only interstate where they have that silly 1 intake mod law.

You MUST not interfere with the pipe that runs from the AFM to turbo and also must not interfere with the BOV (yes this also means the cross over pipe must remain standard) and its recirc pipe.

Apart from that yes... You can have a pod providing its secured, you can also have an fmic providing it has sufficient ground clearance and there is no cutting of the body work involved, which rules out 90% of the FMIC kits available. I run a Sperco Bar/plate with center position in/outlets, this allows an easy 180degree bend to be used so I am able to run the piping back to the stock route.

My piping leaves the turbo, uses the stock piping route in to the inner bumper, the piping then runs behind the FMIC at the bottom (airflow here is blocked by the bumpers lower lip so no issues doing this) it then throws a 180degree bend in to the fmic, the air cools through the fmic, it then has a nice short route to the cross over pipe once again using the stock piping route.

Ring regency.. This is what I was told some time ago when looking in to allowed mods.

thats interesting then maybe i wll just leave my pod on as well . i have a disc here with all the australian adr rules and it says 1 mod only i would have thought that would have been aust wide tho

and the answer is yes...... i had qld rego and was in vic theres a defect sticker for you son.......

but its only really in vic there mega anal and have the two inlet mod rule.

qld, is lax as

nsw; bit anal but not too bad

vic; defect

nt; they have no mod laws its absolutly insane i loved it there

perth; dunno

act; not too bad

well i think there bit worse here from what ive heard so upto you i guess mate, great ocean rd drive shouldnt be too bad, just tell them your on holidays leaving soon etc etc they should leave you alone

yeah thats sorta what i was originally thinking. ah well, i gotta plan it all out first. :P

interstate car in sa is interesting... afaik, u CAN get defected..but once ur back across the border it's null & void.

exactly, and vice versa. My SA reg car got defected in NSW, i got it cleared but by that time the car was just about to return home so i never even lodged the clearance papers.... The interstate defect only applies in the state of issue unless they have recently changed it, ie technically my car is still defected in NSW. I got it back to SA, then got locally defected :), but as far as cops were concerned they had no idea it had an NSW defect.

Back on topic, my car has just gone through regency with a huge HKS type-R FMIC, lets just say it didnt fit without some 'modifying', and it went through fine. It also went through with the pod. From what ive heard from workshops that see heaps of cars that go through, FMIC is not an issue, but if the install of the return pipe is a messy hole hacked out of the car, ive heard them pick on this.

Any change to a cars intake system has the potential to alter emissions, and therefore you CAN be defected for it. Unfortunately the onus is on the owner to prove complaince rather than on the police to prove non compliance.

Yes, it sucks but basically you can be defected for anything non standard.

Yes, it sucks but basically you can be defected for anything non standard.

yeah thats the thing isnt it. it would depend on the sort of cop going over your car. you get the asshole cop that looks for anything they can find, then you get the laid back cops that inform you of potential defects and let you go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...