Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I used to have one but forgotten most features....but i 'think' it may have the ability to save 2 tunes??? (the SAFC-II that is)

Why you would want that i do not know but anyway, it's there.

If you already have a SAFC-I, it should be fine.

If you're looking to buy, you may as well get the SAFC-II

I think there's even a newer one that has 256 colours or something??? on nengun... looks frigin sweet !

Edited by Birnie
  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

have you got one showing your afr's ?

that's some pretty steady boost there. which boost controller are you using?

he didnt give me one showing my a/f :)

it was a jammed turbosmart, full of crap and wouldnt boost past 12psi no matter how much i opened it up... untill i blew my motor.

ive got a turbotech now and it holds boost even better.

I might just hunt down a used safc1. I doubt i'd see benefits from an safc2.

Good to hear the turbotech does its job. I've got one, but waiting to fit it with safc/tune.

Joe, what's your intake setup? pod, panel, cai? You've got very decent intake temps.

hey tony, i was going to buy a safc and get it tuned by hitman for $400. JeeTeeEss25Tee was the guy who offered it to me. But i bought a power fc instead yesterday. if you want that offer, just pm him. he made a post in this thread on page 1.

cheers

I've read mixed reports about safc improving fuel economy. Many say it does, but others say it wont.

I'm not after big power, just keeping things moderate, but as a daily driver, i need the economy to improve.

I suspect it's running rich with 3inch exhaust and pod. 15L/100kms.

What's your take on this ? Safc will bring me joy, or dissapointment?

From that calculation you are doing about 433km per full tank (65 lt) ye? Mine one was about the same before SAFC (more like 410km) and after SAFC I got an average of 480 to 500 both highway and city driving. If that isn't good enough I'm sure the dyno figure will bring a smile on your face. :laugh:

yeah, i'm gonna try and get out there this week sometime.

Matt seemed very helpful. He suggested getting out there so he could suss it out, diagnostics, etc.

I will most likely be installing your safc Jerry.

thanks mate.

edit: 480kms from 65L (13.5L/100kms) isnt that great either though, is it? When ppl say eg. 450kms per tank, they arent running their tank dry (65L worth), are they? From what i've seen, claims of about 11L/100kms are common.

SECUR1TY, how many litres are you getting per 100kms, or how many kms per 50Litres?

Edited by Munkyb0y

ive just calculated it by my last tank which i got 470k's when the petrol light came on (my car still needs a tune). i calculated 13.8L/100km, so thats pretty average for skylines.

if you're looking for excellent fuel economy you've bought the wrong car. 480 is good out of a skyline. dont forget its a turbo 6cyl. you should only compare it to other cars in its class.

i get approx. 350k's out of my lancer (40L tank), and 300ish k's out of my m3 (60L tank, but its running an un-tuned EMS computer).

if you want something that wont eat up all of your petrol money you should think about buying a weekday workhorse.

damn i hate people quoting XXX kms per tank... it's such a useless figure. if you want to know fuel economy. fill your tank full. then drive 300kms. and fill it up. let's say it too in 45 litres to fill again. so it took 45 litres for 300kms = 15/100kms.

i wish I had 13l/100kms. my GTR is 22l/100kms (mix of city/highway, but no peak hour driving) and my V8 soarer is not far behind at 18l/100kms (almost all peak hour, city driving). The only decent one is the R32 GTST which from memory was around 13l/100kms. i say just deal with it, fix it, or drive less. or buy a cheap arse 1.3l econobox:)

I'm using that calculation, it's just easier for me to say per tank figure than per 100km figure. Just like kw or hp whatever. But ye if anyone using the fuel gauge to estimate then they will never get it right.

damn i hate people quoting XXX kms per tank... it's such a useless figure. if you want to know fuel economy. fill your tank full. then drive 300kms. and fill it up. let's say it too in 45 litres to fill again. so it took 45 litres for 300kms = 15/100kms.

i wish I had 13l/100kms. my GTR is 22l/100kms (mix of city/highway, but no peak hour driving) and my V8 soarer is not far behind at 18l/100kms (almost all peak hour, city driving). The only decent one is the R32 GTST which from memory was around 13l/100kms. i say just deal with it, fix it, or drive less. or buy a cheap arse 1.3l econobox:)

but saying 300kms to a tank means nothing. what is a tank size? i've tried looking it up but funnily enough there is no industry standard for a 'tank of fuel'. horspower is a standard unit of measurement so I dont see how that compares. a kilometer is a standard unit measurement as is a litre. a tank is meaningless.

it's just a pet hate of mine.

lol, calm down beer baron. yes it's agreed, L/100kms is a more useful measurement.

i'm curious as to why so many members on the numerous 'fuel' threads quote as low 11L/100kms. Maybe wishful thinking, or maybe mostly highway k's?

Anyway, yeah i'm not concerned about my skyline burning fuel, only concerned if it's burning alot more than it should be.

You know what i mean?

I went to see hitman today. very nice guy, helpful, and cluey.

anyway, while poking around, checking consult readout etc, matt pulls the ecu out and finds a unichip unit hidden behind it. lol. i had no idea it was there. he told me to keep it rather than swap it for a safc, coz it can do a bit more, like timing and possible boost.

so it looks like JeeTeeEss25Tee's safc is still for sale.

if it wasnt for the unichip, i would've had it by now.

i'm off to research unichip now. any advise for me?

  • 2 months later...

sorry to bump the thread again.

I was wondering what is HITMANS number, and where is he located??

Also another quick question..

Will a safc help me in the following:

Fix up my flat spots (real bad flat spots)

Improve fuel economy (seems like you have proven it has)

But the most important thing i want is to be able to fix my flat spots..

I dont want more power extracted with more flat spots!!

Cheers all..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 🙂 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
    • Welcome!  Can't go wrong with a Stag.
    • Looks good. Nice height.
    • Hey all, a little help from the Stagea hive mind plz.. I'm days away from buying either a 2002 Stagea 250tRS AR-X Four, premium leather, power seats and all the old switches etc that go with it, or a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO, pov pack, cloth seats etc, with coil overs, sports zorst, comes with original zorst and suspension and parts. (I think I've got the models right?) Both are VQ25DET, have 160000kms, both straight no rust both with $2000+ in recent servicing receipts, both ride on aftermarket 18" rims. The Aero has a replaced turbo as well. I like the cool factor of the Aero car but the AR-X has never been modified. Neither have been driven hardly at all in the last 5 years. Any thoughts on which one or does it come down to personal preference? davemoto 
×
×
  • Create New...