Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its TYPE-M DOOOOOOOD, you have just set yourself up for some serious flamming, so Ill start it lol.

All r33s are type-m and you r refering to a series 2, they have different bonnet headlights and frontbar.

lol my bad..that's why ppl come over here to be educated rite ? =)

i guess i will take the flaming as part and parcel of being in the community

anywayz, thanks for ur last sentence...know i now wat to get for a Type-M front

thanks

chock

Edited by chock

R33S2 - I think he is referring to getting his S1 to look like a R33 S1 with the Mspec bumper and side skirts. Not a Series 2. I know ppl say all R33's are Type M but a lot of car dealers/importers refer to a Series 1 M-spec as the version that came with the sideskirts and different front bar from factory

The dealers would be wrong. I've been saying this for ages. People on the forumn have only started realising it after the r34 gtr Mspec came out.

There is no such thing as r33 gtst m spec. Jspec also calls it the wrong thing. It's Type-m.

It's just like do you call an integra R spec?

I was looking to do this on my r33 but i cant find a secondhand "M-Spec" (haha just to annoy Manwhore) front bar in good condition and reasonable price in WA. Carmate sells a replica on their website though. Pretty sure you dont have to change the headlights

so...the help guys?

lolz...u know the series where the front bar looks hell lot "Fiercer" than the current GTS-T S1...

was wondering if anyone did it..and whoever did it...how much ...

chock

Maybe this is what you meant?

This was the bar that came on my car when I bought it (non type m)

post-29425-1160220171.jpg

& this was a type m I put on my car

post-29425-1160220496.jpg

The bar cost me $150 from a guy I met on this forum & it cost me $350 to get it painted, probably only $200 without the two-tone paint.

The bar looks great & you can't tell the difference in colour where the bar meets with the guards.

Hope it helped :)

Ladies and Gentlemen...

we got a winner..thanks so much Yo-yo..

a pic says a thousand words..2 pics 2 thousands words =)

thanks..the price..is not too shabby too...so wif the front bar..there's space for an aftermarket intercooler and all?

chock

Ladies and Gentlemen...

we got a winner..thanks so much Yo-yo..

a pic says a thousand words..2 pics 2 thousands words =)

thanks..the price..is not too shabby too...so wif the front bar..there's space for an aftermarket intercooler and all?

chock

No worries mate,

I was planning on a front mount but now I'm not going to bother as I am trading up to an r34.

I've been told the type m bar needs to be slightly modified to fit a front mount. Apparently they need to cut out the middle part that holds the licence plate... but that's also where most of the bar is fitted to the front reo bar :whistling:

Maybe somebody on these forums has done it before & can shed some light on this.

Edited by Yo-Yo

just so you know, all turbo r33's are type m, except for some of the auto's. i had what is refered to as a non type m bar on my car, but according to FAST my car is a type m. i think it depends on whether the car has ever been in a crash. the non type m bar is actually the sedan front bar.

just so you know, all turbo r33's are type m, except for some of the auto's. i had what is refered to as a non type m bar on my car, but according to FAST my car is a type m. i think it depends on whether the car has ever been in a crash. the non type m bar is actually the sedan front bar.

Are you 100% sure that it is the sedan front bar? I dont think this is true. Then what about the side skirts and rear pods? And ive also seen pics from old Nissan advertisements of the coupes with this front bar. Also a number of websites claim that the R33 GTST came out with a number of bodykits, lights etc. Its just like how ppl reckon only 95 onwards came with drivers airbag, however mine is a 94 and has an airbag.

And Im NOT saying that all turbo r33's arent type m

drivers airbag was optional on pre 95 model r33s. as were sideskirts.

the r32's had differences between the type m and the standard gts-t such as leather gear boot and handrake cover, leather steering wheel and bigger brakes. all of these features are standard on all of the r33 gtst's.

the only other reason for the different front bars i have found was that there was an optional front bar for gtst's.

for a list of models go here http://imports.motortraders.net/imports/se...p;model=Skyline

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...