Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok sorry but i have to

Wikipedia - "A naturally-aspirated engine or normally-aspirated engine (or "NA" - aspiration meaning breathing) refers to an internal combustion engine (normally petrol or diesel powered) that is neither turbocharged nor supercharged."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturally-aspirated_engine

Enjoy the drive - "An engine that does not feature forced induction. In a naturally aspirated engine, air flows into the combustion chambers at a rate that is equal to or less than atmospheric pressure (usually less than atmospheric pressure, due to restrictions in the intake tract)."

http://www.enjoythedrive.com/glossary/parse.asp?id=8420

Smart Plugs - "* Artificially Aspirated: supercharged, turbo charged "

Bioethics website - "Need all nations agree on this definition? Or is it not more likely that some cultures will accept cortical death while others will demand brain-stem death and yet others will insist that a patient is still alive so long as his heart is beating, even though his entire brain is gone and he is artificially aspirated,"

**So being on a respirator is articially aspirated apparently

http://www2.unescobkk.org/eubios/bfp/BFPFL.htm

These are just too name a few... Please go ahead argue with the world- Mate you are wrong admit defeat. There is no matter of opinion fact is fact..

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what the hell have i done!!!!!!

while i enjoyed reading the said view points im leaning towards not bottling just yet so any ideas that are cost effective and work.

3L bottom end yes is very interesting i even went as far as buying one and getting it ready to put in. i ended up keeping the 25 because after see her evolve im a bit in love with her. and by all reports the 3L bottom ends just don't rev as hard as the 25 ends.

so does this mean that without opening her up i've done as much as i can.

Just to add to this whole NA shitfight......

NA engines draw in their intake air under their own steam.... usually it's "Natural Air"

Turbo/Suprcharged engines have a similar "Natural" charge of intake air..... just more of it at once.

Hence if there is more air in there...... there is also more oxygen = more power (tuned correctly of course)

Nitroused engines usually draw their intake charge into the engine "Naturally".... ie. without assistance from any blower of any sort, so the amount of air/gases is the same as a "Naturally Aspirated" engine

The difference that makes an nossed engine not NA.... is that the intake charge it has drawn into the motor is anything but "Natural"...... it has been manipulated to contain more oxygen, and therefore is not "Natural"

So for my money..... nossed engines may indeed draw in their air "Naturally"...... but that's not all of it. They're not drawing in natural air, so they're not naturally aspirated.

nitrous or N2O doesn't replace the fuel, it replaces the air

as in its a richer source of oxygen

(or at least i thought so)

so in that case, you are getting more oxygen from a bottle in the car, making the oxygen delivery to the combustion process "unnatural"

for those interested i just bought a set of 440's to go into the silva just have to get them cleaned and flowed and in they go. they off to get the shit tuned out of it then to willow bank to see what sort of quater she can do.

tuning is still going to take a while so for anyone out there with any ideas of what else to do please keep them coming.

didn't want to under do the injectors nothing worse than running out of fuel. went to 440's from the word go so that i don't have to upgrade for a while.

i went the wolf because thats what was recommended to me. spoke to a few people and they all seemed to rate them. took a while to get right but once it was i couldn't be happier it really pulls hard now.

damn that hand controller is ugly though. keep it in the glove box!!

3 litre bottom end is where it's at.... sacrifice 1000rpm for lots of torque, more lower in the revs too.

What compression you at?? Shave the head a little??

thats it, the rev's you lose wont matter, as you may lose the ability to rev that extra 1000rpm or whatever, but the power you would make that 1000rpm later, you will be making more of it with more than 1000rpm lower...

besides... get it all balenced and set up properly, sacrifice the $$$ and get the RB30 block to rev just as high and make HEAPS more power :laugh:.

  • 2 weeks later...

LMAO @ the nitrous debate! :P

A few people touched on the correct understanding of the product.

Slip introduced the very helpful concept of 'supercharging'. Supercharging as we commonly know it has 3 sub classes: 1) The old school GM 6/71 blower and its huge varitey of spinoffs, 2) the turbocharger, and 3)nitrous oxide. Of these, the blower and turbo are both forced induction (FI), while nitrous oxide is chemical supercharging.

All 3 forms of supercharging have one and only one purpose in mind... Give the engine more oxygen. The more oxygen an engine can take into the cylinder each intake cycle the more fuel can (and must) be added to burn with it.

The turbo and blower compress normal air with an oxygen content of 21% by 1, 2 or even more times its original volume and stuff it into the cylinder allowing you to use your chosen method (EFI/carbies/?) of introducing a matching ratio of fuel.

Nitrous of around 33% oxygen, being stored under pressure as a liquid, changes rapidly back to gas once introduced to the intake tract. This action chills the rest of the intake charge also, hence making it far more dense than before, hence even more room for more air and nitrous exists! Once again simply add the correct amount of fuel to burn with all that extra oxygen!

:laugh:

Il be keeping an eye on this thread as I cant wait to se what you run down the quarter with this car and also id be very interested to know what you end up getting at the wheels when you got it all tuned up and going how you want it to..

For an NA Silvia i must say that in my opinion 170rwhp is quite impressive!! Id be happy with that in my r32 GTS thats for sure..good stuff

BTW, it always seems that at the start all interesting and good NA power up posts get hijacked by all the NOS crap... Not everyone wants that sort of power,its good for pure drag cars and for bragging rights and thats about it in my view. I personally prefer a car thats quick in any situation on the road and on the strip.. thats my 2cents anyway..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...