Jump to content
SAU Community

Which exhaust system would you go for?  

67 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Which turboback exhaust system would you go for?

According to the CES brochure, their exhausts are able to produce a 40+kw gain from stock, and the stainless steel system includes silver ceramic coated mild steel twin dump pipe (coated inside/out) and stainless steel pipework.

I haven't checked out the XForce yet, but according to comments from this forum, it really does look not bad. The CES is like twice the price, and with that price difference, I could do a lot of other stuff!

http://www.xforce.com.au/

http://www.cesracing.com.au/

Anyone used any of these systems before? What do you think about it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

BOS importing SS $380 for front/dump

trust PE2 catback SS = $900

Hi-flow Cat = cant remember the brand but cost 300-400

Get SS unless u want to be replacing it after a few years,

Dont go cheap on the exhaust, its 1 of the most important mods and prob the hishest KW gain/dollar spent u will achieve.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2601900
Share on other sites

Mild steel will last more than "a few years"

Your driving a turbocharged car, exhaust temps are quite high etc etc

I plan to run a mild steel exhaust on mine, and i expect it to outlive the life of most other parts on the car without a doubt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2601907
Share on other sites

I've heard from the mechanic that mild steel is pretty good unless you damage or scratch it by going over bumps...

when that happens, servicing would be necessary to prevent rusting/etc...

the exhaust is a pretty impt upgrade, which is why i'm really torn between these two options! but i'm really wondering if the performance difference is that great to justify the costs?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2601915
Share on other sites

Get the Xforce Cat back in mild steel, 'proper' high flow cat (not Xforce) and get a CES Split dump pipe.

With the same specs cat back exhausts pretty much the same performance wise. Don't bother with a cheap 'hi flow' cat they are probably not high flow. CES split dump pipes are a great bit of gear, better in every way than the cheap Xforce dump.

My advice based on experience.

Edited by JCMarshall_Law
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2601973
Share on other sites

I'm torn. I have a partial CES system (with the rest Fujitsubo) and it works great but you're right about having money left over for other things. Shit, there's enough spare cash for a set of cams there.

I voted mild steel xforce but it's a tough decision.

I would think that you will end up within about 10-15 rwkw from worst to best but maybe run less boost on the better ones. This should mean less stress on other components and some minor fuel efficiency gains.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2602059
Share on other sites

all dnt line up for shit. i hate fitting them. its like they drop there jigs and keep on making them regardless.

ive had to make 3 cuts in a x-force dump pipe at one stage.

ps.. the stainless two piece ones seem to fit alot better.

id personaluy go for a kakimoto or something thats decent quality

pss. the ces ones like to break off at the turbo disharge flange

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2602141
Share on other sites

BOS importing front/dump pipe $380

Metalcat 3" hiflow cat with flanges $345

3.5 xforce catback $450

all up less than $1200 for the best flowing stainless turbo back.

the xforce systems are quite loud.

Don't skimp on the front pipe and the cat spend your money there and just buy an xforce catback.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2602277
Share on other sites

Ive got the exact same system as above in all stainless, except had to put in a 10cm section between cat and catback, as ive got a sedan.

Yeah the x-force is loud, but you can control the sound with your right foot.

cheers

Evil

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2602537
Share on other sites

I'd just go the x-force I have one and its fine!! :)

Mild steel will last years the odds are you'll end up selling the car before the zorst starts to die..

Maybe a new high flow cat if your really after power but mine made 175kw on 9psi with it + frount mount.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2602680
Share on other sites

BOS importing front/dump pipe $380

Metalcat 3" hiflow cat with flanges $345

3.5 xforce catback $450

all up less than $1200 for the best flowing stainless turbo back.

the xforce systems are quite loud.

Don't skimp on the front pipe and the cat spend your money there and just buy an xforce catback.

This configuration sounds good! Maybe i'll go for the mild steel version of this. If i still have the car when the mild steel exhaust gives up, i'll just upgrade it to a better one ^_^

I was actually thinking of getting a HKS system but... they're too expensive! Sad.

Edit: Wait. This is legal in QLD and VIC, right? I don't wanna get hauled in for emission or noise level and get defected.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2602983
Share on other sites

Yep, just organise the BOS split dump from BATMBL on the forums in the trader section.

I had the BOS split dump, CATCO stainless 5 inch cat and Nismo cat back. Power went from 140 rwkw to 185 rwkw. Same dyno same day!

nismo cat back!?! damn! i want one!

now i'm just waiting for my mechanic to call back. brisbane's mercury motorsports provides really good service!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2605559
Share on other sites

I've got a CES combo, stainless split dump HPC coated. Mild steel through to the stainless muffler.

Gives and extremely good tough note, sits under legal dB range. Best money I've ever spent.

Previous cars I've gone the budget routes and ended up with either droney or power-robbing results...the guys at CES seriously know their shit and you'll leave 100% happy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139590-xforce-vs-ces/#findComment-2605643
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...