Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

anti lag/launch control on the power fc for the gti-r used to kill it at the lights!

people were scared!

I have been lookin at the bee r one tho for the gtr. school zone limiter it will become haha

Edited by Angus Smart
  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

so for the people who have these how much boost are you making when the two step is enabled?

i know with most aftermarket ecu 2 steps you configure the amount of ignition retard, amount of extra fuel and rpm for operation and can make big boost on big turbo's for launch, but how configurable or useful are these standalone types that you are all discussing?

so for the people who have these how much boost are you making when the two step is enabled?

i know with most aftermarket ecu 2 steps you configure the amount of ignition retard, amount of extra fuel and rpm for operation and can make big boost on big turbo's for launch, but how configurable or useful are these standalone types that you are all discussing?

It will most likely hit full boost, whatever that may be set to

I know plenty of people that are using stutterboxes (fuel cut), and they make around 15psi

So I can only imagine, ignition cut will work a lot more effectively

I"m not really sure about the pros and cons of it.

I know that the Bee-R style simply cuts the earth from the system therefore the signal going to the plug cannot complete, hence no spark.

The Gizzmo style actually cuts signal going to each cylinder sequencially, therefore not dropping the same cylinder each time, which may or may not happen.

Dropping earth means that there's no control of exactly which plug gets dropped.

I guess the Sequencial would be better simply because it cycles between each cylinder.

I don't know which one would be better until you tested them back to back..

I reckon both make cool flames!

Turning them off wouldn't really be required, as if you are staging to launch RPM, which is probably going to be like 4500 rpm, you would be hammering your car anyway.

With the PFC, no. It's a complete stand alone unit, the PFC wouldn't even know its there.

Turning them off wouldn't really be required, as if you are staging to launch RPM, which is probably going to be like 4500 rpm, you would be hammering your car anyway.

With the PFC, no. It's a complete stand alone unit, the PFC wouldn't even know its there.

I meant more from the point of flat changing because it would be shifting gears at full boost and I wouldn't want to constantly do this. I'm guessing I could just put a two phase switch between the power supply and the launch control.

Isn't the idea of these types of units to interfer with the signal going to the coilpacks and would therefore operate regardless what ecu you had. I know for a fact the Bee*r unit works with PFC because they installed one in the HPI r32 and it runs a PFC. I'm just not 100% sure on the gizzmo unit?

Edited by BAMR33

Yeah, that's what I mean. You install it, the PFC doesn't know it's there hence no changes are required.

With the Gizzmo, you cut the signal wires going to the plugs (from the PFC) and the signal goes into the Gizzmo and out the other side. When the Gizzmo wants to control rpm, it just doesn't allow the signal through.

Sh1t, these are so damaging for every aspect of your car, but I want one sooooo bad!!! My question is can they be turned off for when you want to only hammer your car and not kill it.

couldn't you just set the launch rpm higher than the redline rpm limiter?

edit: from what ive read, there is 3 knobs on the Bee-R limiter, Rev1, Rev2, and Gain.

Rev1 sets your redline limiter.

Rev2 sets the launch control limiter.

and Gain sets the frequency and length of limit.. setting gain to 0 disables the limiter apparently.

http://www.driftworks.com/index.php?action...p;resourceId=16

I don't see the point in wanting to turn it off.

They run off a switch on your clutch.

When the clutch is in, the RPM limit is set at say 4500rpm

When the clutch is out the limiter is like 7500 rpm

The only time you would encounter the launch rpm limit is if you had the clutch in, and dialed up more than 4500 rpm with your right foot.

The only time I dial up 4500rpm with the clutch in is when I'm about to launch pretty freaking hard, and it's then that you want the boost on board.

I don't see the point in wanting to turn it off.

They run off a switch on your clutch.

When the clutch is in, the RPM limit is set at say 4500rpm

When the clutch is out the limiter is like 7500 rpm

The only time you would encounter the launch rpm limit is if you had the clutch in, and dialed up more than 4500 rpm with your right foot.

The only time I dial up 4500rpm with the clutch in is when I'm about to launch pretty freaking hard, and it's then that you want the boost on board.

i was thinking the same thing, its not often you would have the clutch in and be anyway near the launch rpm...

yep, I just thought it would be easier to have switch so you don't have to screw around with the settings every time you want to use it.

set the gain to '0' and it disables the limiter.

Question:

Won't cutting the ignition to all the plugs with the throttle open (BeeR limiter) cause the plugs to get fouled? (ie. bad)

Whereas with the Gizmo one the plugs won't get as fouled cause they are still being sparked?

I don't see the point in wanting to turn it off.

They run off a switch on your clutch.

When the clutch is in, the RPM limit is set at say 4500rpm

When the clutch is out the limiter is like 7500 rpm

The only time you would encounter the launch rpm limit is if you had the clutch in, and dialed up more than 4500 rpm with your right foot.

The only time I dial up 4500rpm with the clutch in is when I'm about to launch pretty freaking hard, and it's then that you want the boost on board.

Call me stupid but how dos this affect the limiter when heel toe-ing down a gear....

clutch in, right foot on anchors and accelerator, heel toe to 6K for example, wouldnt it hit limiter?

But as mentioned its probably not a great device for track work, just drags

Jez

No, they both work almost identically.

The Bee-R cuts spark to earth, therefore all cylinders.

The Gizzmo cuts spark to each individual cylinder.

Both systems drop spark.

Both systems have the potential of fouling plugs, but it's not like you are sitting on the limiter for hours.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
    • The stock manifold is "mostly" divided. The divider actually has a notch cut out of it where it would meet the divider on a twin scroll housing. I have no idea why. But whatever the reason, it would cause some cross talk when used with a twin scroll housing. People do put twin scroll housings onto that manifold. But I'm of the opinion that proper twin scroll internal gating is...not really possible at this scale. You'd be throwing good effort (ie $$) after bad, when you really should be doing something else. Notwithstanding that.... I am not sure what the idea that you are floating has to do with the difference in comp cover position caused by the highflow using a shorter length core than the stock Hitachi one. Can you clarify what you meant?
    • Majority of regulars are > 30. We all act at least 50. Definitely not friendly as we're all grumpy. 😛
×
×
  • Create New...