Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its a simple answer really. Just get the plain rotors, non slotted. And once you have them in your hot little hand go and get them slotted however you like.

But thats assumign the slots are the problem...reality is its probably only part of the problem.

I don't see how you can blame the pads.

Firstly, the metal in the rotor will be massively more conductive than the pad material (Any pad material).

I don't see the pads as to blame. But if you've got a pad that can handle higher temps, your rotors will hit higher temps if you start braking to use that extra capacity.

In the OEM setup, the pads can act like a thermal cutout. You can't get too much heat into your rotors because your pads will overheat and pack it in well before that will happen. But go to a pad and fluid that doesn't mind a bit of work, and all of a sudden your rotors are achieving temperatures they didn't used to. And you'll start seeing heat problems you wouldn't otherwise achieve with lesser pads.

As an analogy, we all know about the WRX's driveline. The clutch is intentionally weak, so if the tool behind the wheel decides to keep doing redline clutch dumps the clutch lets go. But when those owners decide to upgrade the clutch....since the clutch can now transfer more torque.....the gearbox then takes the load and starts disintegrating.

(This is all speculation on my part, but what I'm saying is that while the pad isn't guilty of extra heat its also not irrelevant to why the rotors are heating up more.)

Scathing what you are saying is fine, but remember it is the rear rotors we are talking about. They don't get any where near as much heat loading as the fronts. Yet they still crack.

A second point to remember is that, however good your brake ducting is, for the time you are braking you are not getting any cooling effect relative to the heat input. So losing a few tenths of your brake pad coefficient, whilst it makes the braking zone longer has very little effect on the peak temperatures the rotors reach. In saying that there will obviously be a difference on the rotor face immediately beneath the pad. The crucial point as far as this post is concerned is that the cracks do not form or propogate from this region - they are edge cracks.

In trying to pick something to fix the problem I would suggest:

Remove the stone shields. The fit closely to the inside of the rotor & may well promote a differential in the cooling of the rotor which in turn will induce stress & promote fatigue.

Try some one elses rotors. I have pretty much lost faith in DBA. certainly I can't see the value in the 4000 series. Maybe try RDA, project mu or even something fancy like AP Racing.

I dont see the problem being from the slots in the rotor. Almost all race rotors have slots of some description. But perhaps worth noting is that other than DBA, no one seems to run the slots to the outside edge of the rotor.

Easy answer, the DBA engineering and metallurgy is crap. Don't buy their product while they persist with their novelty bs of k-paw and stupid slot design. They have had cracking and wear problems for years.

Thermal management after lapping is important for homogeneous cooling and grain structure development, and for preventing pad material migrating through the disc causing localised material changes but won't make the buggers crack.

RDA have not let me down and I'm considering buying a set for the GTR and flogging the DBA's it came with.

poor metal in the rotors. thats just metal fatigue. from overheating and cooling to rapidly.

dba isnt to bad but there not cast using diferant metal from run of th muck taxi spec 35dolar rotors.

there :motorsport: range use diferant material im prety sure.

this is why im curiouse about whats gonna happen to the rotors used in those g4 8 pot kits...

not to worry adam. jjust stick the stockes on there and theyle be fine. and last longer to :)

Well my G 4 discs are working ok and i think the material in the disc must be ok as i washed the car and most times i used to get rust form on the old discs but not any more for some reason. So i would say they are made of a better material than the older discs, or the heat treatment is better. Still have another 300kms to go for bedding in and then we will see how they stand up on a track day.

For anyone who is interested about rotors why don't you come down to DBA this saturday the 4th of November between 12.30 and 4.00pm Race Brakes Sydney have organised some tours during the afternoon of the DBA factory so you can see and ask questions about your problems.NO kids under 16 sorry and covered toe footwear has to be worn.You do not have to book just turn up and wait for the next tour to start also RBS will have some specials for the day(just a plug).

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Por que no los dos? At least my euro brawler is reliable - unlike the JDMs I've had. Sheraaz you look familiar, did you ever come to an SAU VIC meet aaaaaages ago?
    • Drove to Cape Schanck to try to get a nice clear southern view over the ocean to see the lights a couple of days ago... instead got crappy cloud cover. Photo of a diorama of Hong Kong street scene. Taken on an iPhone 13 Pro Max.
    • Stock RB fuel pressure is near enough 43.5 psi, so the latency in that table at 31.6 will be close. You can see that 7 or 8 psi equates to about 0.4µs extra latency. So if you wanted to interpolate between the 31.6 and 39.9 psi values you could say you're going up about 2 psi out of those 8, so add about 0.1µs, which is barely worth talking about and is quite possibly wrong because ideally you would fix the latency while running at the appropriate conditions on the dyno, with a wideband sniffing its butt.
    • The pressure, is what you set the fuel pressure to. If you have the factory fuel reg, you'll need to find the factory spec. I don't know it off the top of my head, but someone else might.
    • For others, what GTSBoy states here should be paid attention. Why? Well lots of people play with different engines, and they LOVE to change things like remove AC, or steering pumps etc, and it lends to them needing to move the tensioner too. You want your tensioner, particularly those that are sprung or hydraulically tensioned, to be the first thing after the harmonic balancer, or technically the "last" pulley in the chain. By saying last pulley, I mean look at the direction the crank spins when the engine is running, follow the belt from where the crank is pulling the belt FROM, and keep following that until you're between the last pulley/accessory on the belt and about to reach the crank again, this is the spot where you put the tensioner. This is the area that will always end up with slack. This is worked out exactly the same way for chains too, as the physics is the same for them. The crank pulley is where all the force to drag the belt around comes from. You will never ever get rid of the slack that appears, especially under load. The tensioners job is to keep the belt loose enough when stationary that there shouldn't be out of sync movement in slow movement, and then be tight enough when running, that the belt can't jump off any gear and get damaged. Too tight, bad things happen, too loose, bad things happen. Have a tensioner (mainly sprung/hydraulic one) in the wrong spot, it can't actually do anything about keeping the tension.
×
×
  • Create New...