Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just got a pair of HKS GT2530's rebuilt with Garrett parts. I know that HKS put the oil restrictors in from the factory, but i've read that Garrett don't.

I ordered a HKS GTRS gasket kit from nengun, and that came with a oil restrictor. Sould I use it?

Thanks

post-5985-1162638221.jpg

post-5985-1162638281.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141833-turbo-oil-restrictor/
Share on other sites

I just got a pair of HKS GT2530's rebuilt with Garrett parts. I know that HKS put the oil restrictors in from the factory, but i've read that Garrett don't.

Garrett do, any Ball Bearing turbo correctly built/assembled will have an internal restrictor on the cartridge itself.

You cant see that till you pull it apart though. The pics you have an external ones.

I know the Garrett GT30XX series was a .8mm (if memory serves me correct) :(

And that was 2 years ago when i had it, so Garrett were doing it back then for sure.

Being Garrett make the HKS turbos aswell, i dont believe you have an issue.

They dont actually "put" them in.

If you saw the inside of the cartridge you would know what i mean, its on the actual bearing housing itself... so its like that from the production line.

Im sure MTQ will be able to explain in better english :(

I have heard with GT3540's some people have been having trouble with leaking turbo seals due to the high oil pressure run by some high performance engines, Garrett supply another oil restrictor smaller than the inbuilt one if people have trouble, not sure if you would need one or where to find them

No, as i said... There is a restrictor on the cartidge.

There is only going to be "X" amount going in there whether you run 50 restrictors or one before you get to the cart itself.

If you fit a larger restrictor before the restrictor on the cartridge, then obviously it will slow the oil/volume down to the core, but once it reaches the core its only going to let in what the internal one dictates anyhow so to my limited understanding of fluid dynamics, it makes no difference.

Contact MTQ and see what they say, but i never ran anything more than the internal restrictor for my GT30 and i had an N1 pump etc.

I could name a dozen others who have done the same with thier setups, not one has blown a seal or had adverse effects.

If the twin setup is different, i would like to know why :)

If you look at your second picture you can see the restrictor in the oil inlet hole . Its the hollow mushroom shaped gadget that needs an inverted flare fitting . All these GT25 BB centre sections have them , actually its the stem of the restrictor that does fore and aft location of the bearing pack itself . If its not there the turbine and compressor try to shunt backwards and forwards depending on which side has the greatest thrust load at the time driving its opposite wheel into its housing - not good .

I guess two restrictors can't hurt but I'd rather have the one only in the turbo because it has unrestricted flow to within a couple of cm of the bearings .

Cheers A .

  • 2 weeks later...

well up here in qld there have been a few people blowing seals out at the track...gt30s and 35s alike. Alot of people are now starting to run an inline restrictor that sits right before the cartridge one. I think its about 40psi of oil pressure is the max required for the turbo. Does that sound right disco?

Edited by r33_racer

I still havn't got round to contacting MTQ. been to busy doing other stuff on the car to worry about putting the turbo's on yet. I'll post MTQ's responce when I get round to ringing them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I hadn't thought about the variable power steering assist. Presumably, it will always be the same level of assist as you get in an S14. The R32/3/4 are either helliishly heavy (at low speeds) if the solenoid is not powered at all, or hellishly too light (at high speed) if it is powered all the time. I presume that it is PWM controlled on those cars. I hadn't thought about the S cars not having variable assist. ugh. What crappy plebby cars they must be!  
    • Hmm yeah that is a good point. It looks like it'll just bolt in with no real issue besides maybe the bushings being different. My other concern was that 2 pin plug that I assume is used in some way to control the rack solenoid depending on the speed signal from the ecu. The DMAX rack doesn't even have that plug though so, don't think it'll matter. Might just order the rack and see how it goes. Will update this when I figure something out
    • I'd say it's a fair bet that the feed and return fluid lines will be in different enough spots that you would need to come up with a way to cut the originals short and adapt with new hard line adaption or braided teflon hoses or somesuch. But really, you have the car, you have the photos of the DMAX rack - you should be able to go out there and see for yourself whether they're in the same or different spots.
    • I've been doing some looking around and honestly was just considering throwing a new rack at it. I saw that the dmax silvia rack bolts up into the 33 with the silvia bushings but not sure if the high pressure lines will sit in the correct spot. I believe other version of the 33 rack are the same/similar to the racks that can be opened up without as much fuss so I assume the dmax rack would fit but any ideas?
    • I've never played with one, but I would expect that you are correct. That slot looks like it is intended to be used to unscrew the end, and the flats on the body would be better than grabbing it around the round bit with a pipe wrench. So, yeah, probably unscrews. You'll probably have to make a tool to drive in that slot.
×
×
  • Create New...