Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My old s2 Rx-7 i got defected and sent to the epa

I had 12a extend port 2.5in piping through to 1 muffler

got 122.4db @ 4000rpm (but it did back fire when the guy backed off, prior to the back fire it was around 115-117)

after that i put an extra muffler in and one of those in car adjustable flanges in the middle and it brought it down to 95.2 db so i passed

No probs with my new car

its all stock

I would say mines around 130db @6k ;)

Is it measured at a certain RPM?

has anyone got away with setting the rev. limit lower to pass? I have not had mine measured, but it has a nice note, prob very close to what is allowed.

I think it is a bit of a sign when you go to visit mates or family and 3mins before you arrive they are out the front waiting because they could hear you coming about 2kms away.

I had an old bloke a while back comment on how nice my car was and how good it sounded (must have sounded nice and quiet through the hearing aids). He commented on how good it was to see money being spent on a passion (i guess he meant cars are better than drugs) and how nice it was that I looked after it and kept it clean.

Is it measured at a certain RPM?

has anyone got away with setting the rev. limit lower to pass? I have not had mine measured, but it has a nice note, prob very close to what is allowed.

Depends where you are. In NSW, there are a few tests:

* Stationary noise test is at least 75% of the engine speed which corresponds to

maximum rated power. Say max power is 6000RPM, test is 4500RPM or higher.

Not less than 3000 RPM. Not louder than 90dB.

* Drive-by test is slightly different, and described in ADR28 (get this from the DOTARS website).

Approach at less than 50km/h in 3rd gear, WOT for 20m, close throttle. Can't be

louder than 90dB at any time.

*IM240 test - done at Penrith or Botany, PPM of particulates and gases measured.

Also has a noise component, also cannot be > 90dB at any time.

Don't think you can artificially lower your rev limit; and even if you did the flames would probably

be noisier :P:)

Regards,

Saliya

Edited by saliya
any increase in exhast dia. will give you a performance gain... it is better if its cat back obviously.

Cat back is all you really need anyway, turbo back is an unecessary expense... "bang-for-buck" wise anyways

I'm not sure about this one, either way if only part of the exhaust is changed, the airflow restriction is there...there is no point changing catback only, the dump front pipe already restrict the flow...

the same with changing front pipe and when the exahust reaches the catback, flow is restricted...

actually where does the droning come from? sound resonation due to pipe length? or because of the the type of resonator used...

actually I'm thinking if we can obtain the db of the exhaust, in theory we could get the wavelength and custom a pipe length such that the exhaust ends at a softer zone...if my physic serves me right...

Well on my R32 GTS with a 2.25 catback with just a 4inch JUNbl cannon i would consider it VERY loud, the 1st time i got pulled over and had it tested it tested 91db. They made me get in the car while one officer watched that I held the revs at 3100rpm and the other officer stuck the reader at the end of the cannon. I measured 91 db and the cop said we wont worry about that because its only 1db over. 2nd time i got pulled over by a motor bike cop and he was so dam rude saying hes defecting me for my "extrememly defective exhaust note". same deal... tested 91 again and he let me go.... Anyway i dont getit why i havnt failed, i mean you can hear my car coming from streets away, i often think its a bit excessive for me. My work phone has a db reader onit, i did the same test and it read between 118 and 121 db's...

wierd..

Phones are not accurate enough to measure the db ratings. In wa police do not carry db testers. I was pulled up because of my exhaust and i told them it is adr approved and they said "oh" and let me go .

Do your police carry db testers?

I run a straight 3 inch turbo back with a high flow cat and a 4 inch muffler and one resinator.

Edited by Silent

yep,dunno about ALL cops having db testers but the bike cop did and the other coppers that tested me were undercover traffic patrol so ja...

here in SA we also apparently had a trial of a system that takes a photo of vehicles that exceeded the legal db rating... that was like well over a year ago and i havnt heard anything about it since... they sed its set to a level that would mean you would have to well exceed the maximum db aloud on the street..

I have a 4" HKS cat back system with a 5" cannon & a fake cat and it did 99db @ 3700rpm...

It made a real bellow... near impossible to be discreet around the po po!

It's getting changed before she's back on the road.. :ninja:

Phones are not accurate enough to measure the db ratings. In wa police do not carry db testers. I was pulled up because of my exhaust and i told them it is adr approved and they said "oh" and let me go .

Do your police carry db testers?

I run a straight 3 inch turbo back with a high flow cat and a 4 inch muffler and one resinator.

yeah in W.A the cops are not equiped with mics...no EPA as well

resonation sux anus ...

pipes straight off the motor for award winning purposes

now, a proper post ...

*loading ... *

the exhaust on my r33 was pretty loud and droney.

all i had on it was a 3" catback, with virtually no resonator, which then went into 4" with almost no muffler (tiny straight thru design) with a 5" tip

sounds nice, and angry

now my munro just is ridiucously loud, and has no drone, booyah

Ah i just got EPA'd for having too loud an exhaust. Gotta take it in before next month.

The day in question, i was driving back from a performance shop with only 3 bolts in my dump, because of some snappage, so it was pretty loud.

Was thinking once i get it fixed itll be all good, but now.. Alot of people seem to get high readings. I've got split dump, 3" - 3" cat then 3" back to HKS super dragger muffler with 5 or 6 inch tip and from what i've read it seems like i'll be looking at 95db + (90 is all thats allowed in vic). Its a rb20 so i didn't think it was that loud. On idle it has a nice lumpy wrx-like note and inside the car the revving isn't very loud, with my mate driving it past me it sounds good but like, i've never set car alarms off. Are the rb25's much louder?. My pod used to drown the engine revs out. This topic has got me worried though.

How can i make it quieter temporarily? I need the flow.. Can i jam something up there, like idk feathers or something to make it quieter? Sucks because i've never had any trouble about exhaust noise b4

Edited by 123456
I would say mines around 130db @6k :laugh:

Rotaries are fun aren't they?

I think by memory....no rotary will pass epa in Vic without serious de-tuning.

Anyway..........

110db at 6700rpm.

At least that's what the EPA wrote down on inspection :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...