Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It means that you jumped onto the bandwagon and bought a cheap r32 skyline.

In all seriousness, it just means that the engine is worn. Most likely compression is low. rb20s are cheap as chips. You can buy them for around 1k.

If the car isn't causing you any problems like bad fuel economy, or stalling or cutting out or anything, you can just leave it if you like until it dies, then get a replacement engine.

If you really want, you could rebuild it now, but a rebuild, even to standard spec, will cost you thousands (probably 4-5k+).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2680937
Share on other sites

i gotta become a pizza boy! must be making good money if you are looking at putting an rb26 in. or you haven't seen the price of doing the conversion.

i'd just wait till the engine dies and put an rb25 in, and spend a bit of money on that.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2681473
Share on other sites

they can tell your engine is tired because the smoke is getting out. Engines run on smoke, and once all the smoke is out it won't run anymore.

A second hand rb20 is pretty cheap if you are worried about it, otherwise keep turning up the boost until it blows up and then put a new one in.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2681921
Share on other sites

i have figured out it will be 10k all up to do the conversion, thats including getting the engine, labour, gear box etc. i get paid a fair bit being a pizza boy around 40k a year on the way i am going. i am just good at saving i guess. but i am still finishing up on the look of my car and suspension. RB26 will be like th last thing. was thinking of the RB25 and having a stroker kit put on. wont be much different wouldnt it??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2682360
Share on other sites

a rb25 conversion done on the same budget as a rb26 conversion will probably get you better performance. and if you happen to blow the motor it is a darn sight cheaper to rebuild. just put a rb25 in, then get a bigger turbo and new ecu and you'll be laughing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2682543
Share on other sites

rb30 block = slab of beer

n/a rb25 head = $600

rb25 box = $1000

little odds and ends = $500-1000

thats doing it on a bit of a budget, but it shouldnt cost more than that.

its a better/cheaper idea than a stroked rb25, rebuilding it with forged internals would be a good idea too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2682743
Share on other sites

i've looked briefly at the economy of doing various engine conversions you have a few options.

-Stock rb25det

-Stock rb26dett

-'built' motor add $4k or so

-build an rb24 or rb30 out of your rb20. probably $5k or so, but you have a 'built' motor for close to cost of a stock rb25det or rb26dett. but you are still stuck with an rb20 head which doesn't flow as well as rb25 or 26

rb20 engines are cheap as chips, i have a spare in my garage just waiting for me to blow this one up.... The risk you run putting an rb25/26 in is that the engine you get will also be 'tired'

Edited by MerlinTheHapyPig
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2682783
Share on other sites

rb30 block = slab of beer

n/a rb25 head = $600

rb25 box = $1000

little odds and ends = $500-1000

thats doing it on a bit of a budget, but it shouldnt cost more than that.

its a better/cheaper idea than a stroked rb25, rebuilding it with forged internals would be a good idea too.

I know those NA heads are cheap but dint they have weaker valvesprings then a stock rb25det

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2682817
Share on other sites

I know those NA heads are cheap but dint they have weaker valvesprings then a stock rb25det

im not too sure.

like i said thats doing it on the cheap and you wont need to do the oil feed to the VCT with the n/a head.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2682872
Share on other sites

flash89 what are you looking for? there are a few rb20s around making good power if you want to go quicker.

rb25, rb30 and rb26 will get you moving even quicker but they can get much more expensive (in that order)

check out the rb20 thread in forced induction performance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2683102
Share on other sites

flash89 what are you looking for? there are a few rb20s around making good power if you want to go quicker.

rb25, rb30 and rb26 will get you moving even quicker but they can get much more expensive (in that order)

check out the rb20 thread in forced induction performance

dont listen to him. he's blown 6 motors :huh::):)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2683546
Share on other sites

with whatever option you go with it'll be silly not to get new rings and bearings.

yes and no, i mean to do that, take the head off, remove the pistons/rods then if you want to change the crank bearings, take the crank out, then maybe give it abit of a hone, then you have the head off, may as well replace the stem seals while you're at it (since they come with the head gasket kit), give the valves a bit of a lap, maybe you decide to get the head serviced, recut the valves, port/polish etc! it adds up....

once you've reached that stage and fixed anything that is out of spec, may as well do a proper rebuild while you're at it. and you have probably already spent $1-2k if you had this done at a workshop.

Only take the motor apart if you're going to do a proper rebuild, budget $3-4k if you need everything done at a workshop. Of course, it's best to do a proper rebuild, and if you've just bought a motor and it's out of the car, then now is the ideal time to do it.

Rings, rod bearings, head gasket can all be changed with the engine in the car, if the second hand motor is running well and has good compression, and you don't want to do a full rebuild, then don't fix something that ain't broke....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2684189
Share on other sites

the crank doesnt need to come out to do the bearings. you need to do it carefully though. i've changed bearings on cars with the motor still in the car with just the sump dropped with no problems what so ever (checking clearences though).

thats $150 on bearings. rings will cost you another $250ish.

a full gasket kit cost me $160 without the valve stem seals.

and if you REALLY want to do the head, it'll cost around $500 for a full service.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143668-engine-tired/#findComment-2684331
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...