Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, for those who have tried and tested. Is there much to be gained over the original R32 GTR sway bars with say whiteline uprated bars? If there is i may choose to replace them in my rebuild.

If i do choose to swap to aftermarket are the GTR bars any good to the GTS-t owners out there? If they are feel free to make an offer.

Deren

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/144766-r32-gtr-sway-bars/
Share on other sites

Rear bar will fit GTS-t but front wont as the front subframes are different (you have a front diff). The aftermarket whiteline swaybars are solid and considerably stiffer because of it (24mm rear is 147% stiffer than stock)

You also get the added bonus of having adjustment in the swaybars to adjust to the handling balance you prefer.

Ok thanks for the help mate, i appreciate it! So you suggest replacing both front and rear? Do you know what they are worth? Best place to buy them from?

Anyone want a GTR rear sway bar? Hehe, its already detailed up in satin black.

Groupbuy

And yes, replace both front and rear otherwise it will not be balanced. Only having front bar will make it understeery and only having rear bar will make it oversteery.

Edited by salad

It is true that hollow bars are much more efficient at handling torsional loads and therefore you can save 5-10kg from them. But they are much more expensive as hollow spring steal is not cheap, the range of sizes is limited and it is harder to mandrel bend (more expensive machinery is needed)

It is true that hollow bars are much more efficient at handling torsional loads and therefore you can save 5-10kg from them. But they are much more expensive as hollow spring steal is not cheap, the range of sizes is limited and it is harder to mandrel bend (more expensive machinery is needed)

id like more info to but why would you need to mandrel bend them anyway?

sowhat is a better upgrade for a r32 gtst a GTR standard one or a whiteline?

If not mandrel bent, the cross section across the bar is not uniform and therefore stiffer in some sections than others.

The better upgrade depends on what spring and shock rates you are running. GTR rear swaybar is indeed a good value for money upgrade, but it is no where near as stiff as the aftermarket whiteline ones available.

22mm swaybar is 74% stiffer and 24mm is 147% stiffer. With the Whiteline bars you also get the added bonus (if you choose so) of adjustability.

By my rough calculation a solid 25mm anti roll bar is less than twice as stiff as one with a 2.5mm wall thickness.

Or to put it another way a 30mm od bar with a 2.5mm wall will do the same job as a solid 25mm bar for less than half the weight.

Edited by djr81
cusco do them for 32 GTR. justinfox has the cusco ones. ARC do them too. I'm sure there are others.

Not that I have seen.

Hollow stabiliser bars are horrendously expensive to make.

A few poeple have claimed to have aftermarket hollow stabilisr bars on their Skylines.

But when I check they are either solid bars or simply painted standard bars.

:pirate: cheers :kiss:

By my rough calculation a solid 25mm anti roll bar is less than twice as stiff as one with a 2.5mm wall thickness.

Or to put it another way a 30mm od bar with a 2.5mm wall will do the same job as a solid 25mm bar for less than half the weight.

Not quite.

A 25mm solid bar is 191% stiffer than 25mm hollow with 2.5mm wall thickness, so almost 3 times as stiff

The 25mm solid bar is still 64% stiffer than 30mm hollow but the hollow is 23% of the weight. One way to have the same stiffness as a solid 25mm bar is to have 33mm OD with 3.2mm wall thickness. This bar will be 32% of the weight of the 25mm solid. There are endless combinations of OD and thickness that you can go through to make the same stiffness though.

Edited by salad

All this is very interesting. So should i just stick with my hollow genuine items cuz they are lighter etc? Will the dampers/springs be ok as the only mod to inhibit body roll? It impresses me when i find out things like the hollow bars etc on the GTR are standard. It was a damn fine car for its day, not to mention now!

Deren

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...