Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You cut the sensor out of the std rb25 AFM and you put the sensor in to a 3in pipe because the std one is 2.5in so this means that less air will go past the sensor,has anyone done this before.

Similar to what Autospeed did except they used a seperate bypass pipe then the digital fuel adjuster to get the A/F mixtures correct.

In theory it should work the same way, just don't damage the AFM hotwires!

You cut the sensor out of the std rb25 AFM and you put the sensor in to a 3in pipe because the std one is 2.5in so this means that less air will go past the sensor

umm... no it doesnt

have you looked at an AFM before?

You'll see that changing the diameter wont affect it at all as the AFM wire is in the middle of the AFM itself.

The amount of air going isnt going to change

I think it would, wouldn’t the wire measure the air and then calculate that by 2.5'' pipe

so if the pipe was 3'' the air would measure the same but there would be more air in the 3'' pipe then the 2.5'' pipe.??

I'm just guessing..

area of a 2.5" pipe = 31.6cm2

area of a 3" pipe = 45.5cm2

the bigger pipe will flow more air, but since the sensor only reads what goes though the little hole it sits in, then calculates how much air that is for the designated size of the pipe, when you put it into a bigger pipe it throws the calculations out and you end up with leaner mixtures.

as has been said, the AFM wire will indeed sense less amount of air, but all this will do will make the car run leaner as it will add less fuel. without tuning it would be useless. and given you'd have to tune, it makes sense to go z32 if you are going the whole hogg

btw.. nissan AFMs use a hot wire with variable resistances, right?

but since you generally have to run some form of either piggyback or full ecu to run a z32, i don't think that leaning out would be an issue since you have to get it tuned for the afm either way.

personally i'd just get an ecu that uses a map sensor.

just know about this a while ago....

found a webpage that did this...and in the same time...upgraded his injectors...

so i think there wouldnt be any problem if u cut off the AFM and fit it in a bigger pipe and in the same time fit in a bigger injectors....and tune it back to optimal settings....

i just dont see a problem with this MOD...

plus...u can save some cash....for budget drifters....

Edited by r32gt_rb20

Bah, pack of gurls! =)

There’s a risk, but in reality if you seal the sensor to the pipe well ( careful not to use any noxious adhesives that will eat the PCB) and tune it properly, ( piggy back, FC) it would be well impressive to get it working.

Perfect for the budget conscious.

That said, for $300 there’s no way i would risk my motor :D

M

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...