Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has anyone tried to get an aftermarket ECU to talk to an auto trans computer in an r33. I would like to be able to fiddle with the fuel loops particularly in closed loop mode but i still want the engine/trans to behave like they do from the factory.

I have been looking at the wolf v500 and it seems to have the capability to retard ignition or cut fuel based on an eternal signal (say power upshift) assuming thats how the 2 computers communicate . Can anyone tell me the signals between the computers are as simple as a wire for power upshift, downshift, etc or if there is more to it.

cheers

neil

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145145-aftermarket-ecus-for-an-auto/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

there is no such thing as the auto trans computer in the r33

the gearbox logic is done in the factory ecu, so theres nothing to fix.

your ecu needs to be aware its on an auto car and cut IGN timing on gearchange. it needs to know when the auto box is about to change gears

imho no aftermarket ecu will do it

The only reason for the retardation of ignition timing is to lower torque during the change, many cars get away without it. I never noticed any adverse effects.

The auto DOES have its own ECU, it only needs to know throttle position and road speed to correctly time the shift points.

The standard engine ecu sends the TPS signal to the auto ecu, i just bridged the tps signal input to motec to the tps wire going to the auto ecu.

there is no such thing as the auto trans computer in the r33

the gearbox logic is done in the factory ecu, so theres nothing to fix.

your ecu needs to be aware its on an auto car and cut IGN timing on gearchange. it needs to know when the auto box is about to change gears

imho no aftermarket ecu will do it

how do drag dood do it who run Autos?

I've had am aftermarket ECU in my tip FTO for ages with no issues...but it doesn't make as much power as say my line aswe all know PFC is the way to go generally.

there is no such thing as the auto trans computer in the r33

the gearbox logic is done in the factory ecu, so theres nothing to fix.

your ecu needs to be aware its on an auto car and cut IGN timing on gearchange. it needs to know when the auto box is about to change gears

imho no aftermarket ecu will do it

Paul if that was the case as soon as a stand alone ECU was plugged in you would only get 3rd out of the auto it doesn't just guess where to shift.

OK... I have done some searching for myself and found the following

RB25DET wiring diagram

and also

Generic nissan ECU register table

So it looks like there are 2 wires into the main ECU and 2 wires out (not necessarily all to the auto computer) and the registers for the Auto computer include throttle pos sensor,engine RPM and vehicle speed which may come from the main ECU or directly from the sensors.

There is also registers for the throttle closed switch and what i think is Wide open throttle position switch which may or may not come from the main ecu.

P,N,D,2,1 and overdrive are all obviously switches and i think 'shift s/v a' and 'shift s/v b' could be the power/snow switch for the auto because nothing else seems to fit.

Which leaves

kickdown switch - as im guessing the auto comp makes all the shift decisions i would assume this is a signal to the main ecu that the gearbox is going to drop a gear.

Powershift switch - same as above except going up a gear.

ASCD - od cut - ?

ASCD - cruise - ?

hold sw - ?

overrun/c s/v - ?

Can anyone confirm any of this???

no its not the case at all. the drag cars dont use electronic auto boxes, they use mechanical ones. like the one in the vl turbo. it doesnt need electronic crap around it to cut when changing gears. the electronic boxes do. using a manual ecu on an electronic auto like the one in the r33 will not cut the ign timing on gearchange.

its not to do with gear change logic, the auto box knows how to change gears, its do with change gear preparation, that is, stock ecu has logic for when the auto box is about to change gears and cuts the ign timing to protect the auto box and ensure its a smooth change. it wont be stuck in 3rd or anything like that at all.

what you are certainly likely to see

detonation on gearchange

map tracer showing load staying near the middle on gearchange (inducing more possibilities of detonation)

harsh or jerky changes

delays with kick back and change down

kjb is right the back off timing is there to take torque load off the auto box and thats its sole purpose. without, you are placing more stress on the box and what ever other gremlins hide away. by all means go for it.

send us a map tracer of a gearchange, someone ?

no its not the case at all. the drag cars dont use electronic auto boxes, they use mechanical ones. like the one in the vl turbo. it doesnt need electronic crap around it to cut when changing gears. the electronic boxes do. using a manual ecu on an electronic auto like the one in the r33 will not cut the ign timing on gearchange.

its not to do with gear change logic, the auto box knows how to change gears, its do with change gear preparation, that is, stock ecu has logic for when the auto box is about to change gears and cuts the ign timing to protect the auto box and ensure its a smooth change. it wont be stuck in 3rd or anything like that at all.

what you are certainly likely to see

detonation on gearchange

map tracer showing load staying near the middle on gearchange (inducing more possibilities of detonation)

harsh or jerky changes

delays with kick back and change down

kjb is right the back off timing is there to take torque load off the auto box and thats its sole purpose. without, you are placing more stress on the box and what ever other gremlins hide away. by all means go for it.

send us a map tracer of a gearchange, someone ?

You said there was no such thing as an auto trans computer in the R33. This is wrong. If you unplug the trans comp the box goes into limp home mode and only has 3rd. So does it have one or not?

Lets face it, if Apexi called it a feature for auto cars like HKS do there would be nothing to suggest not to use a PFC in an auto car except perhaps the R34s which I believe have the auto computer in the main ecu not as a seperate unit but I could be wrong.

well if it has an auto computer or not, it changes nothing

the auto logic to back off timing is inside the main ecu unit for nissans.

for toyotas its in the seperate computer so this only applies to nissans.

the PFC is a manual ecu only, it is clearly stated in the manual, production documentation and various distributors who sell it.

there is however apexi powerfc auto versions for toyota chaser

as the logic control is outside the main ecu they are able to work with it.

there are a fair few extra functions on the auto powerfc for gaerbox control, speed ramping, change logic and speed based gearsetting

what about getting a piggyback like that microtech? you can set them up to map above the max of the afm, or remove the afm completely as they have a map sensor.

has anyone used this sort of setup on an auto? i have seen it used on manuals, but not auto's (i don't even know anyone with an auto).

yeah the best comprimise that i can think of is either a piggyback system so something like emanage, microtech, or any form of piggyback

or change to a mech auto box. but this is assuming you actually care about the auto box and worry about it. some people dont, so in their case it probably is fine. but i dont accept the "its the same as stock" as it cant possibly be.

would also love to see a map tracer run of a gearchange, still waiting for this. this could yield some info for us and possibly provide a 3rd party hack for cutting timing on gearchange

yeah the best comprimise that i can think of is either a piggyback system so something like emanage, microtech, or any form of piggyback

or change to a mech auto box. but this is assuming you actually care about the auto box and worry about it. some people dont, so in their case it probably is fine. but i dont accept the "its the same as stock" as it cant possibly be.

would also love to see a map tracer run of a gearchange, still waiting for this. this could yield some info for us and possibly provide a 3rd party hack for cutting timing on gearchange

If the timing is the only issue maybe just ask HKS why the F-CON systems disable it :) As you know they are a piggyback system yet actively disable this oh so important feature. I'll find out soon enough when I get my PFC.

What i want to do is to adjust the fueling to improve fuel economy on the highway which is 90% of what i use my car for. A piggy back won't help when the computer is in closed loop mode. I did think about disabling the oxygen sensor to trying to make it stay in open loop all the time but i suspect it wouldn't work and is not my prefered solution. An added benefit with an aftermarket ECU is the possibilty of using a wide band O2 sensor and possibly implementing a lean cruise closed loop mode.

I haven't heard of anyone getting an aftermarket ECU to talk to to the factory auto properly but i suspect that due to limited demand not that many people have really tried.

paul are you saying that main ecu decides when the gearbox is going to change? because i would have thought all of this would happen in the auto computer, with a signal back to the main ECU to say 'hey im about to change gear". Obviously the main ECU decides what to do when it gets this signal. The problem i can see is finding the signal and turning it into something an aftermarket ecu recognises. Looking at the info for the wolf v500 it has a provision to modify the ignition and fuel delivery based on user defined aux inputs, so it would just be a matter of configuring however much ignition retard when that "change gear" signal is present.

Thinking about it further i don't think it would be overly difficult to use a microcontroller like a PIC to capture the signals you want and turn them into a usable output assuming some information is available on how it works..... I haven't been able to find anything so far :)

If the timing is the only issue maybe just ask HKS why the F-CON systems disable it :D As you know they are a piggyback system yet actively disable this oh so important feature. I'll find out soon enough when I get my PFC.

well if its a piggyback then the stock ecu would cut the timing from underneath the fcon so it would simply follow the stock ecu's lead on cutting the timing, piggyback'ing is fine there should be no issue whatsoever with piggyback onto stock auto ecu.

its only when you rip out the stock auto ecu and replace it with a manual ecu, as the manual ecu has no auto logic control. manuals ecu's are any ecu that has no logic control (so any ecu other than stock)

i run my PFC with closed loop feedback off and ive tuned it via a wideband sensor so the economy is pretty good now. its better than what it was with 02 feedback on so its not a big deal. you could simply unplug the 02 sensor and then tune with the piggyback system, i dont see why it would be a problem

i forget how the logic for the auto works exactly but i am pretty sure the stock auto ecu has patterns for gearbox change gear patterns and simply follow these to work out when to cut timing, it didnt know the r33 has a stock ecu & gearbox ecu. can anyone clarify? even if it does, the stock ecu still needs to cut timing so its not different.

has anyone tried it with the wolf3d v400 ?

it's common knowledge on skylines (r32-r34 etc.) that the auto transmission control is done by the ECU. Some cars have a separate ecu for auto trans, skylines don't.

there may be some form of interface between the actual transmission and the car's ECU, but the car's ECU does the important stuff (i don't know for sure because i've never had to work on an auto).

There have been several cases to my recollection of powerfc's blowing up skyline auto transmissions, it's a well documented problem!!!

i run my PFC with closed loop feedback off and ive tuned it via a wideband sensor so the economy is pretty good now. its better than what it was with 02 feedback on so its not a big deal. you could simply unplug the 02 sensor and then tune with the piggyback system, i dont see why it would be a problem

I would have thought that disconnecting a sensor would make the stock computer go into limp home mode...

the standard oxygen sensor is only good if your chasing a afr near 14.7 but with a wideband should be able aim higher with a fair amount of accuracy.... i believe you can go as high as 20:1 but i think you would need to keep a close eye on the exhaust temp around there. You are probably right about not needing to be closed loop assuming it is well tuned.

I have access to SAFC so perhaps it is something i will try first.

thanks

nah if you unplug the stock 02 sensor it shouldnt cause any problems, fairly easy to try. it wont go into limp mode, it just wont run closed loop. limp mode on the stock ecu is simply rev cut at 2500 which is activated by disconnected or faulty airflow meter.

around 15.5s is about the safest light cruise afr you would want to dial in. any more and the exhaust gas temps get really high and risk the engine.

mine are tuned around here and it works really well. i got just on 540ks to a tank on highway driving

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...