Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I bought some injectors a little while back and they seem to be getting more and more suss.

i got them flow tested the other day and these are the readings i got for some 555cc inj.

71cc @40 psi for 15 sec

69cc @40 psi for 15 sec

70cc @40 psi for 15 sec

71cc @40 psi for 15 sec

71cc @40 psi for 15 sec

72cc @40 psi for 15 sec

All done at 36ms

I don't know if he tested them correctly but the figures as far as i can tell dont meet 555cc however you work it out.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145285-flow-tested-my-injectors/
Share on other sites

Done a lot of this stuff before myself.

The info given is not the absolute flow rate of the injectors, but a flow rate for them being pulsed on & off for 15 seconds, rather than a minute.

However there is a lot of info missing. It doesn't tell you what proportion of the time the injectors are turned on (duty cycle) & what speed they are turning on & off at.

I think the 35milliseconds refers to how long the injector is on for each time it is pulsed, but without the other info it means nothing.

40psi is also an odd pressure to use as normally flow ratings on injectors is done using 3 bar of pressure or 43.5 PSI.

To put it in perspective the rating you have been given is from the people that tested it is:

284cc/min @ 2.76 Bar with ?% duty cycle & 36ms duration for each pulse

The rating for your injectors as you have stated is:

555cc/min @ 3 bar with 100% duty cycle (Ie it is on 100% of the time)

Edited by JazzaR33
Done a lot of this stuff before myself.

The info given is not the absolute flow rate of the injectors, but a flow rate for them being pulsed on & off for 15 seconds, rather than a minute.

However there is a lot of info missing. It doesn't tell you what proportion of the time the injectors are turned on (duty cycle) & what speed they are turning on & off at.

I think the 35milliseconds refers to how long the injector is on for each time it is pulsed, but without the other info it means nothing.

40psi is also an odd pressure to use as normally flow ratings on injectors is done using 3 bar of pressure or 43.5 PSI.

To put it in perspective the rating you have been given is from the people that tested it is:

284cc/min @ 2.76 Bar with ?% duty cycle & 36ms duration for each pulse

The rating for your injectors as you have stated is:

555cc/min @ 3 bar with 100% duty cycle (Ie it is on 100% of the time)

I think i understand what you mean.

So it is probable that the injectors will make 555cc at 100% duty

The reason im asking is because i just want to make sure i run them safely when i install and retune.

Do you think i should find someone else to flow test them?

Yes there is still a good chance they are fine. I'm guessing these are the Jecs body feed injectors (same style & brand as original injectors) never had much trouble with these in my experience, but yes it would be good to double check.

Ask them if they've tested other sets of these injectors before, they should have data on the other sets (I kept copies of all my testing data for future reference, which came in very handy) they may be able to tell you if the rates were normal.

Pulse testing injectors is a good way to test them, I did most of my testing that way. I'd also check the spray patterns too to make sure that the fuel is vapourising properly.

It's definantely a good idea to flow test them at maximum especially if you have little or no previous data on their 100% flow, just so you know what they're meant to be doing.

Your set looks like they're flowing fairly evenly from the results, if he wasn't using a proper flow gauge or timing setup that could account for some of the variation, still acceptable though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys, Just want some advice on r34 GTT ac system. Since I’ve owned it, the ac compressor, doesn’t matter the set temperature or ambient temperature, runs for around 10 seconds then disengages the clutch, then re-engages everywhere 30 seconds or so and keeps repeating this.    is this normal?   I had it recharged today as it was slightly low and thought it would fix it but still does it. it cools fine in summer even prior to the recharge, except for the usual warmup when stopped or in traffic (still yet to wire overheat fan to on with ac)   any thoughts would be much appreciated 
    • To plug the hole. The engine plant may not have known whether the car it was going into had a gauge or not. It was a long time ago and the integrations might not have been fully modern. Or they might not have cared because the extra inventory and processes to save a few cents on the sender might have cost more anyway. But please tell me you are not still confusing the idea of a pressure gauge sender, and an oil pressure light switch. The switch will be out there. In a separate hole. Probably with only one wire running to it. Running the light.
    • Blower needs to go low on the exhaust side, displacing the AC and PS, which you have to decide whether you want to keep and how and where to relocate if you do. Electric option for PS is, at least, helpful. Sadly, there is no workable 12V electric AC of any value. Whilst the blower is the last compression step before the throttle, and so it might seem a good idea to have it near the inlet manifold (as mentioned above), you probably want it to go through an intercooler first, so, having it on the opposite side of the car facilitates that air flow path. The turbo discharges into the blower, so proximity of the turbo's compressor outlet to the blower's inlet is nice. But then you might want to intercool that too, before boosting it again....which would probably be a ball ache. Routing pipes out to the front and back could be a bit shit. If there was room for (at least) a small (but preferably larger) water to air core on that side, then that would probably be the best approach. I guess a reasonable alternative would be to locate the blower where the alternator is (more or less, associated with the inlet manifold, per Matt's thought), and somehow incorporate a water to air core into the manifold, sort of like they do for modern blown V8s. The big difference here though is that those V8s have only the one throttle (upstream the blower) and only the one compression step (the blower) and no need for too much in the way of bypass/blowoff valves. Whereas in a twin charged 6, you do need to think about one or two bypass valves associated with the 2 compressors and you would prefer to have the intercooling done before the air has to pass through the throttle. You'd like the throttle to work approx the same no matter what the compression is doing. But if it is located in hot air stream before a cooler, then sometimes the air will be real hot, sometimes it will be quite cool, and the throttle mapping/response will be quite different between those two cases. The throttle, if sized for hot air, would be too large for cold conditions. It's all a ball ache.
    • Package SC on exhaust side. Remote mount turbo. Still a fair bit of room when you get creative on the inlet side of the motor too. Especially if you can get really creative with the welding, and effectively build it into the bottom of the inlet manifold. Would definitely take some design work, and some trial and error, to make sure flow works well still! Might be easier to just start with the Nissan March though... All the work is already done for you...
    • I'll sit down and get a post together 😁
×
×
  • Create New...