Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

which 34 ? (chassis code pls.)

if its BNR34 then yes (GTR) look on th base of the key head if you have a blue or red tab then yes. the quickest way to prove it is to cut a key and have ALL the known keys away from it. from there start your car with the copy. if it goes - no OEM immobilser.

Its a 1998 gtt skyline,just trying to find out if i have to put one in for insurance purposes.

Regards

Paul

doesnt have one. yes the insurance company will require a minimum 2 pt item. where are you?

Am located in sydney.Will be getting the car in about 8 weeks time as it has to come from japan.Was just trying to account for some of the costs involved in this purchase.

Regards

Paul

I also wanted to confirm this as I have just brought a 34 GTT. I read in sales brochures (must have been NZ ones) that they all come standard with an immobilzer security system. Also mine was just taken over the pits and licensed (in WA) as its just come from Japan - I though they would not have registered it without having an immobiliser as thats the law in WA?

I have the key with the blue and black buttons on it. I did get another key cut and I tested this and it did start although i had only just started with the proper key just moments before. Think I better test it again!

Is there any way to get an alarm or immobiliser and have it integrated into the factory key / buttons? I don't want to have to carry around another fob thing for the alarm.

The japanese imob. don't meet aus. standards so you will need a new one. When I bought my car the dealer put one in at no extra charge, but since then I got a Mongoose M80s. Nice alarm with all the features you could want.

The japanese imob. don't meet aus. standards so you will need a new one. When I bought my car the dealer put one in at no extra charge, but since then I got a Mongoose M80s. Nice alarm with all the features you could want.

So does your Mongoose M80 fully integrate with the standard key fob things? ie no extra thing with buttons on it? Also how much did you play for this?

Cheers.

So does your Mongoose M80 fully integrate with the standard key fob things? ie no extra thing with buttons on it? Also how much did you play for this?

Cheers.

I never asked to have it integrated, so I have an extra thing with buttons to operate alarm. I had the same thing when I had the standard imob. just it only locked/unlocked the car no alarm function.

I paid $250 for the alarm M80S (theres like 4 different models i think) and $230 for install of that plus some other gadgets.

So does your Mongoose M80 fully integrate with the standard key fob things? ie no extra thing with buttons on it? Also how much did you play for this?

Cheers.

the one I'm talking about does. fire me a PM for more info.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
×
×
  • Create New...