Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey bakes, could i ask a huge favour... just wondering if it would be possible to take a couple of pics UNDER your car? i need to see how the rear diffuser is attached, i need to see how it's done OEM styles :)

have you measured the clearance of your front lip mate? i think mine is about 90mm... gotta be careful ey! :sick:

Thanks mate, Im heaps happy with it.

Couple more pics, of rear end

Damn! That looks awesome.

Dare I say it but I think the R34 GTR is an overall better looking car then the R35 GTR.

Every styling curve on the R34 GTR is just Tuff as!

Damn! That looks awesome.

Dare I say it but I think the R34 GTR is an overall better looking car then the R35 GTR.

Every styling curve on the R34 GTR is just Tuff as!

I agree.

The r34 gtr has that in your face, agressive, purposeful look about it that just makes it very tuff looking.

I agree.

The r34 gtr has that in your face, agressive, purposeful look about it that just makes it very tuff looking.

+1

Only thing is, if the price of a R34 GTR could not look so mean then I trade up... LOL!

Hmm... But R32 GTR... Yeah maybe, I don't know... LOL! Might stick to it. - Original Godzilla :unsure:

+1

Only thing is, if the price of a R34 GTR could not look so mean then I trade up... LOL!

Hmm... But R32 GTR... Yeah maybe, I don't know... LOL! Might stick to it. - Original Godzilla :O

I would love to have an r34 gtr sitting in my driveway but the price holds me back as well....however in a year or so that might all turn around :wub:

The r32 gtr does have something special about it. Not just the looks and the fact its the original godzilla....there is something else also.

Was a marvelous day today so decided to go out with a mate n take some happy snaps. Actually have a couple of proper shoots coming up over Dec and Jan, but thought I'd give it a go n see first hand what I can do between now and then to make things a little nicer.

Anywho, thoughts?

* Photographer - Stan & Mitch

* Equipment - SONY DSC H10

* Software - Adobe PS CS3 & FrameFun

collage800wh1.jpg

dsc02530800ka9.jpg

dsc02538800ci9.jpg

dsc02539800wc4.jpg

dsc02541800py3.jpg

dsc02542800ka7.jpg

dsc02543800fz2.jpg

dsc02545copy800nf3.jpg

dsc02549800ce7.jpg

dsc02552800ey6.jpg

dsc02553800lp1.jpg

dsc02554800fc5.jpg

dsc02557800kg8.jpg

dsc02560800mi0.jpg

dsc02573800qj6.jpg

dsc02575800nf6.jpg

dsc02587800gi5.jpg

seethroughr3401copy800ib7.jpg

seethroughr3402copy800qu6.jpg

PS: Excuse the n00bness... wasn't exactly a DSLR - effects n features from the base shots were not that abundant.

Some snaps of my newly acquired GTR. I just had it registered 2 days ago.

Massive thanks to my friend Jan for snapping the pics. You can visit his website on the link at the bottom.

gtr8oy9.jpg

gtr5vl3.jpg

gtr4bd5.jpg

gtr6gj3.jpg

gtr2xc2.jpg

gtr3es3.jpg

gtr1nr0.jpg

gtr7cv9.jpg

http://ozcarsightings.com/R34%20GTR.php

I have some small plans for it. Power FC D-Jetro & Tomei Dump pipes are in my room ready to go in.

New set of wheels (probably silver LMGT4 in 19x10.5, +15) are on the list of things to do next.

Enjoy! :banana:

Edited by Huy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...