Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

firstly i would have loved Damien to work his magic but when i booked Mavric i was under the impression FI was still closed later finding out they re-opened. so since i already gave my word to mavric i went through with it and ye very very very happy with it. i will also give FI a go later as well but wont be for another 6months or so.

as for the GTR kit car looks too plain atm so would love to get GTR front bar and decent skirts and z tune bonnet but then again dont really want an aggressive looking car as much as i love the look of the GTR something nice and somple will also be nice like a smooth flowing front lip and skirts.

fair enough. Matt's got all the good gear now anyway, so i know you had good products being used on your car.

i guess my question was, if you're going GTR, you gotta think about bonnets, front/rear guards etc, as skirts and front bumper won't just bolt/stick on with playing around in some other areas.

fair enough. Matt's got all the good gear now anyway, so i know you had good products being used on your car.

i guess my question was, if you're going GTR, you gotta think about bonnets, front/rear guards etc, as skirts and front bumper won't just bolt/stick on with playing around in some other areas.

not if he gets a GTR fibreglass front bar thats made to fit GTT. but you will definately need GTR bonnet so a Z-Tune will finish the look off ;)

you might as well get Ztune side skirts & rear pods from JSAI to complete the look.

clean 34 you got ash! :D

As always, fantastic looking cars.

Heres 2 from the Bush Fire Cruise in qld on the 22nd feb - copied from other thread.

"I know this looks selfish, but when i got back, all the cars were gone hahahaha :down:

Sexy time.

sorry about size - they'll resize and fit into screen once it loads."

DSC02443.jpg

DSC02448.jpg

owgasm thats hot. someday my car will finally look like that lol

Thanks :P

Your car looks great, no need to do much more. :ermm:

like an r33 with an r34 front and rear end? lol

Hahahaha, of course.

He'll struggle getting the roof lower :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...