Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

DOSKI, that looks really good, finally you got it all on..looks absolutly mint. :D

Thanks for kind words,

Yeah im really pleased with the outcome.

just waiting on the Top Secret Front Diffuser to finish it, then it's onto putting in the MFD.

Cheers,

David

hey DOSKI did you get the badge from Power Play? i've been calling them for weeks, no answer

and why the GTS-R badge when you don't have any East Bear items?

Yeah funny you should say that, infact i do have an east bear item , i have the $2190 Carbon Bonnet from east bear that im still waiting on delivery for now hmmm, i think its going on 14 months or so from powerplay, yeah there must be something wrong with the phones there, or else screening calls.............i recieved the badges and the red rear bar fog light but still awaiting on the bonnet, oh i did get through once to be told it was at the couriers place waiting to come here then i waited a few weeks and got in touch again to be told they made a mistake and they had a R33 bonnet instead of what i ordered ,i don't know getting a bit dizzy from the run around.sorry for rant........

cheers

I reckon Doski's GTT looks the best out of all the ones I've seen on SAU .. pure sexx0r.

As for powerplay .. I can't believe you're still waiting on them after 14 months. I would have gone balistic if they hadn't delivered within a month if I'd paid upfront. What do you need a bonnet for when you got this ztune one anyway? Just ask them for a refund .. they are by law obliged to deliver it in a timely manner. 14 months is beyond ridiculous. I'd demand a full refund PLUS interest.

Looks good Duncan.

I have coilovers coming from Japan for mine. At the moment it is WAY higher side on than yours. Ill see how it looks just lowered and then decide if I think I need to get the Nismo side skirt add ons like you have. I might just get the rear pods and leave the sides as is. Time will tell.

Have you thought about getting the rear pods for yours?

Looks good Duncan.

I have coilovers coming from Japan for mine. At the moment it is WAY higher side on than yours. Ill see how it looks just lowered and then decide if I think I need to get the Nismo side skirt add ons like you have. I might just get the rear pods and leave the sides as is. Time will tell.

Have you thought about getting the rear pods for yours?

Thanks mate, It is a bit of a pain being as low as it is.. looks good though, and handles very well.. Keep me posted as you upgrade your beautiful beast... Black looks amazing.

Edited by Duncan1
Thanks mate, It is a bit of a pain being as low as it is.. looks good though, and handles very well.. Keep me posted as you upgrade your beautiful beast... Black looks amazing.

Ill post up some pics when I get the coilovers in. Should be in ~3 weeks time

Edited by Bakes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...