Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

mre, don't u find that after about 6500 rpm the power tends to ease off a bit? i back off the accelerator at about 6000rpm and so it usually reacts by 6500rpm and changes then i floor it again...seems to keep the car in optimum torque range but i think this causes you to lose boost. only really works for 1st -> 2nd gear but just thought someone else may have used this approach...

Well I took my car to CES Racing in Bris to get my exhaust changed and we did a dyno to show before and after. It wasn't in Shootout mode just normal and it got 146rwkw completely stock. The car is just a few days old and nothing has been touched. I thought this is a bit hight for a stock gts specially an auto, is it?

Also they hooked a boost gauge up just for the dyno and it only runs 5psi when it should be like 6 or 7psi?

Well I'm not complaining but yeah the twin dump full exhaust should be a good boost. Also getting the car dynoed after the exhaust tomorrow so will be interesting to see how much better it is... I cant wait :rolleyes:

Plus next friday I'm getting the S-AFC II and the ebc installed and tuned as well. Will probaly run the boost to at least 12psi. Anyone think over 190rwkw with the auto is possible with only these mods?

Well I got quite a surprise when it made 177rwkw with the new exhaust. Had no idea it would give that much more.

I couldn't get the dyno sheet cause the shop was already shut when I picked it up and I just picked it up from the front but yeah so far completely stock automatic r33 except the exhaust.

Could it of been the dyno? It was a Bosch Power Test dyno. Does this matter or affect it?

From what i have seen the C.E.S twin dump systems seem to make similar top end to other 3" systems but they seem to make more mid-range power.

My gf's auto S14 ran a best of 13.759@102mph@willowbank with C.E.S 3" HPC twin dump system, O2 rush pod filter & 14psi.

It's best 60ft was 2.16 & i found that stalling it up on the line & having it just turn the tyres slowly then off the brake, i would get a little bit of wheelspin but because i had about 5psi off the line it would 60ft well.

The fastest 200sx in Oz before the green ghost was a low 12 @ 120ish mph with std auto & 3000rpm dominator convertor.

The skyline uses the same auto!

Yes 3000rpm convertor from dominator convertors, but you don't need to spend that much money to get one, you can get your std one done for $250-$300 from The convertor shop in Brisbane as i previously said. It may be an idea to even get a bigger trans cooler for longevity. And change the trans oil @ least every 20000km with genuine Nissan oil which is a synthetic, we get ours from the local Nissan dealer & just take in a 5L container & they fill it from there 44gallon drum. It only takes about an hour to change it, Its a good idea to remove the pan & clean the mesh filter as well, but make sure you clean it all perfectly as you don't want ANY crap getting into the internals of the auto, & from memory the gasket was about $50. My mate has been using Mobils auto trans replacement oil in his 300zx but changes it every 10000km or so which maybe another option but it is not synthetic, hence the reason he changes it more often.

i was running up to 12 psi boost on mine.

I have heard from many people that the JATCO auto gearbox in the jap cars are not good for anything over 180rwkw. You will spit it out like I did.

Get a manual. you have a 4.3:1 dif ratio.. you will get a second difference down the quarter

hi,

mines an auto with 170rwKW. it changes or bounc at around

7150 RPM.

but to be honest my stock turbo gives less after about 6500.

when i used to run i backed off at just before redline and the box quickly shift, then i hammer it again (you will feel that the clutch packs will bites much harder then letting the computer shift.

i would not recommend high stalling the converter if the car is going to be drove regularly as it is already bloody thirsty!!!

do what MRE did of holding the handbrake as well when launching

and yes!!! AUTOs are much quicker than everyone thought!!!!

ron

Hey Ron, yeah they are quicker then I thought it'd be :)

But I have 177rwkw although I have a big flatspot at 110 where my power is completely linear upto this point but drops to 60rwkw which sucks. Then by 140kph its back up and by 180kph its at 177rwkw.

This is a really annoying dip but I dont go past 110 often but I think its something to do with the stock bov. Does anyone know what could cause such a dip? I think its around the gear change.

And I feel the most power over 6000rpm... heh its weird. Apparently I dont reach my max boost efficiency with my turbo until then, according to the guy who dynoed it. Im only running 5psi.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...