Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if your t04e is a divided, twin scroll T4 turbo, no changes are necessary.

otherwise, to properly use a t04Z, you will need a divided twin scroll t4 manifold. dual wastegates are best. it might make more sense to use a different turbo however

Depends what type of T04z, Garrett or HKS and the rear housing etc.

I dont think the dimensions of either are the same as a T04e

Although, i dont see how dual wastegates are better than a single if you properly design it all and the manifold is correctly made

Technically speaking Geoff is right , a propper "TO4E" turbo uses a T4 turbine and T4 turbine housing . For the record so does the TO4Z turbocharger which has the TO4 "P" trim turbine and any T4 turbine housing profiled for the P trim turbine wheel . If you had a TO4E with the P trim turbine its housing would interchange with a TO4Z turbo/cartridge .

Where TO4E turbo's got confusing is that small shaft TO4 and T3/TB31/TA34 turbines all use the same basic shaft dimensions and so the T3 etc/TO4E hybrids grew out of interchangeability . Mind you just because they fit together doesn't mean they work very well , sell yes , work maybe .

TO4 P trim type turbine housings are availabe in single and dual entry T3 , T4 and T4 International stud/flange pattern . HKS's unique housings are large T4 twin entry (though open to single entry not far inside) housings with a particular V band size . Garrett makes TO4 housings in a variety of outlet styles including four bolt , six bolt , V band and slip ring type .

Basically what the feller that started this needs to ask himself is do I need a 700 odd Hp capable turbocharger or would a 500 Hp one do the job required , that's the real issue here .

Cheers A .

thanks guys for the replies

the turbo I was thinking of is the garrett t04z (not sure about proper rear housing for my application though)

do I need a 700 odd Hp capable turbocharger or would a 500 Hp one do the job required

the 500 HP will do

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • Those above shitboxes, mediocre and above usually have a turbo strapped to them, hence the slightly higher octane is required.  
    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
×
×
  • Create New...