Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone got a 90db high flowing exhaust???

Yes i got hks super dragger2 on mine... I got done by epa and i managed to get away with fitting a hi flo cat (i know i know but anyways), a highflow middle muffler and removing the hot dog stlye thats comes standard in the system, my car tested by epa came in at 82.3dbs which is from what they said very good.. The shop i used liverpool exhuast said that the hot dog stlye muffler is only there to increase noise emitted so changing that worked on mine.. But still to the day some coppers dont believe me that it passed epa with the super dragger rear cannon as any1 who has seen them knows they are very large :D look good on the ass off a 33 i think..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2833256
Share on other sites

btw JAs25t i seen u at the creek last night :D i was there my mate racing his s14 he did alright cept for the crack in the exhuast manifold that happen on his 1st run and his clutch aint holding up very well by 3rd but his pb was 12.46 the black one if u seen with unqiue pro series on doors..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2833262
Share on other sites

112db on my old audi, almost straight through, no cannons, twin oval tips...

never had any trouble from the po po :huh: but damn it sounded good!

Ahaha before epa got me 3 1/4 from turbo back just super dragger on ass sounded fat but they dont like hering my baby scream at 4800rmp

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2835138
Share on other sites

I recently switched from a cannon (no name -came with the car) to a Kakimoto Racing. Still flows well but it is much quieter. Has a very throaty sound. My motivation was to get rid of the drone. Never tested the loudness with a db meter.

You know it is JDM when the english translation on it is "Kakimoto Racing Produce"

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2835303
Share on other sites

When a copper pulls you over - show them the paperwork and that will shut him up.

Actually all that will show is that at the time of fitting the exhaust complied, anything could have changed since so they are still well within their right to defect you.

If you want a quiet exhaust get an Australian custom made exhaust rather than an off the shelf Jap exhaust.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2838074
Share on other sites

I got done for "no cover on intercooler" Pod filter, exhaust too loud (He was a bit iffy, he was listening to it, and was like yeah, then he looked and he's like "nah, too big, it'll be too loud"

But he's like "You passed the attitude test, just get it all legal and you'll be sweet, heres the defect notice, but no fines or anything"

I just answered everything honestly.

And I think the only reason he asked me to open the bonnet was because I was missing two wheel nuts. He wasn't interested in anything other then a random breath test until the other officer noticed them missing... :P Ah well, that's all fixed now, just to get exhaust and what not done...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2839956
Share on other sites

I got done for "no cover on intercooler" Pod filter, exhaust too loud (He was a bit iffy, he was listening to it, and was like yeah, then he looked and he's like "nah, too big, it'll be too loud"

But he's like "You passed the attitude test, just get it all legal and you'll be sweet, heres the defect notice, but no fines or anything"

I just answered everything honestly.

And I think the only reason he asked me to open the bonnet was because I was missing two wheel nuts. He wasn't interested in anything other then a random breath test until the other officer noticed them missing... :P Ah well, that's all fixed now, just to get exhaust and what not done...

No cover on the intercooler WTF.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148346-defects/page/2/#findComment-2839961
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...