Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If Anyone can help me I was looking for some information about the ENR34 2000 non turbo model AWD system as I am thinking about purchasing this car. What I wanted to know, is it the attesa? system or constant AWD and does anyone know of any way to disable the front wheels like you can on the attesa system? Any help would be good

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148899-enr34-awd-system/
Share on other sites

I would put money on it being the attessa system. Nissan wouldn't R&D a new symeterical AWD system for the lower end of their market.

I scratch my head everytime someone asks how to disable the attessa system, I mean once you do - you really have a GTS with a heavy front end. One day I plan on owning my own GTR, and their is no way I would be changing the AWD system thats had millions of dollars spent in R&D on how it reacts to conditions, to adjust it to a backyarders idea of how it should perform.

Cheers

Sumo

sometimes its handy to be rwd for a bit
It's RWD most of the time! AWD is only engaged under certain conditions, like cornering, or rear-wheel slip.

Frankly, if you don't like the idea of Nissan's AWD system, don't get a car with it fitted; get a plain old common-or-garden RWD, like a Falcodore.

It's RWD most of the time! AWD is only engaged under certain conditions, like cornering, or rear-wheel slip.

Frankly, if you don't like the idea of Nissan's AWD system, don't get a car with it fitted; get a plain old common-or-garden RWD, like a Falcodore.

sometimes its nice to STAY in rwd

I would put money on it being the attessa system. Nissan wouldn't R&D a new symeterical AWD system for the lower end of their market.

I scratch my head everytime someone asks how to disable the attessa system, I mean once you do - you really have a GTS with a heavy front end. One day I plan on owning my own GTR, and their is no way I would be changing the AWD system thats had millions of dollars spent in R&D on how it reacts to conditions, to adjust it to a backyarders idea of how it should perform.

Cheers

Sumo

Oh okay cause I was under the impression that the attesa system was electronically initiated, and I heard that you can just remove the fuse to disable the attesa system which sends all the power to the rear wheels, with no front wheel drive at all. Also you can just install a switch which enables you to turn of the attesa, I'm not really sure if this is true or what? but if so thats great.

Oh okay cause I was under the impression that the attesa system was electronically initiated, and I heard that you can just remove the fuse to disable the attesa system which sends all the power to the rear wheels, with no front wheel drive at all.
I'm pretty sure that only works with the R32s. If you do that on a 33 or 34, they go into "limp home" mode.
Also you can just install a switch which enables you to turn of the attesa, I'm not really sure if this is true or what? but if so thats great.
Which is why someone worked out that the switch by-passes the "limp home" function.
actually when u pull the fuse on the r32's it compltely kill the front wheels, but the r33 and r34 the clutch pack is tightened by a spring (or somethign along those lines). basicly they will still be in rwd mode when u pull the fuse.

I'm sorry I don't really undestand can you explain in dumbas language I don't know much about cars.

I'll put it simply for you as everyone else seems to be avoiding giving you an answer.

The R34 25GT FOUR does in fact use ATESSA. They are a great car and if you don't want something fast and like the idea of 4WD would be a great car.

Why bother disabiling the atessa? it's not like he's gonna drift it, and it ain't a crazy performance car so you should be fine.

If you want it to be RWD nissan also make model that is only RWD, therefore you will win either way.

Personally a 4 door auto with 4WD sounds like an awesome car to me.

  • 1 month later...

Hey Guys,

Sorry to dig up an old thread, but had some questions relating to the ENR34, Particualr the 2 Door, Manual, AWD version.

1. Is the drivetrain out of a r33GTR? or more similar to a stagea RSFour.

2. Would it be as simiple as drop in a rb26 and instant GTR?

Thanks

Mario

Hey Guys,

Sorry to dig up an old thread, but had some questions relating to the ENR34, Particualr the 2 Door, Manual, AWD version.

1. Is the drivetrain out of a r33GTR? or more similar to a stagea RSFour.

2. Would it be as simiple as drop in a rb26 and instant GTR?

Thanks

Mario

I have a 2 door, manual r34 gt-four (had it about 2months now) and not many people really know the facts about their set-up, and this is only what i have found after reading up but mostly just driving the car.

1. Yes it uses the same atessa system as the gtr (which is only the computer side of things)

2. No its not a gtr gearbox, its definately not the r34 gtr box cause thats 6 spd, and the gt-four just doesnt "feel" strong like a gtr box, i would say its more along the lines internally of a rb25de box (same as a rb20det) or maybe a rb25det with the obvious casing changes to attach a transfer box.

3. No you cannot pull a fuse and turn it into rwd, that ONLY works for the r32's. Like previously said the car will go into a limp mode. Driving around like this will damage the front diffs clutches. Apparently you can disconnect the front shafts and it will go to rwd but the amont of effort to do it, just by a gtst.

4. HKS torque splitters can be fitted to adjust how much power is distributed to the front and rear. There is NO way to turn all the power to the rear, even with maximum power set to the rear, there will still be about 5% of the power still being sent to the front diff, which means no sitting on the brakes doing a big trev skid.

Although, with about 95% of the power going to the rear, that should be enough to step out around corners.

5. At the stock power level, the car just feels safe to drive in the dry around any corner. I can boot first gear take a 90 degree bend while smashing second and the ass end will attempt to come out but then the front just grips and puts you straight ahead, the car will understeer before it oversteers into a corner.

The wet is another story, since it is mainly rwd it will go VERY sideways if pushed but its a very easily controlled sideways since you can always feel the front helping you stay in control. So pretty much what i'm saying is if you want to go "drifting" like intial D in this car wait till its wet, go to somewhere quite, and have all the fun then, otherwise get a gtst.

6. The rb26 can bolt straight up and id say that once that was done, even in the dry the awd system will be smoking all fours around corners. A more budjet friendly solution is to get a stegea neo rb25det, change the front diff over with the stock gtfour one and your have a 206kw motor in your car cheap. Another good reason to go the stegea motor is that you stock gtfour harness will bolt up and the r34 ecu is flashable so you can get it retuned without spending dollars on a new ecu or piggy back.

Im planning to put a stagea motor in my car, and the more i learn about the gt-four i will post up cause its a bit of a mystery...

Edited by R34GTFOUR
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...