Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

a couple of months ago i switched my standard 2 1/4 inch cat to an xforce highflow 3inch cat.

exhaust is 3 inch turbo back, no mufflers, no restrictions, just a cannon at the end.

standard 25det, running 9-10psi

the car feels less responsive, although i dont think it's making less power overall.

does a more free flowing exhaust trade off response for top end? or is it just my imagination.

its definately louder now, and i'm more reluctant to give it a boot full, maybe that's the problem?

Um, if you have what I call a hi-flow cat (600-700CFM) with ur bmeter properly installed on the cat and there isnt any pieces of turbo fin stuck in it, then you should be getting an increase in response and a slight increase in power.

I mean the ideal working conditions for a turbo is no pipes running off it at all but that would be highly impractical.

What brand of 'hiflow' cat have you got?

This topic has been a matter of contention before. You should gain power from increasing flow but in some cases you will lose some responsiveness in the trade - by this I mean the car will not feel as quick to respond to your throttle inputs but will pull harder once it does. Is this how it feels or are you saying it just feels worse all round?

In my old car I described the sensation as feeling the engine was not as 'tight' - as a stock RB25DET feels quite tight and zippy on the throttle response but you lose some of that feeling with a full turbo back exhaust with the obvious benefit being more pulling power (especially at higher revs).

I got a Nismo 3" high flow from Japan

Increased kw by about 20 and improved response. Maybe it comes down to what Highlow brand you get. eg. some are designed for holden's and fords and don't operate as well in a forced induction car say compared to a HKS or a JUN.

Not to sound disrespectful but 20kw's flywheel or atw's sounds like a mighty gain from just a new CAT, I'd be inclined to think that might be a mistake. If you're referring to a full Nismo 3" Turbo back exhaust the numbers make more sense.

No offence I have dyno prints to prove it.

before high flow with ADR compliant restrictor 154.7 @ all 4 wheels

After Nismo high flow installed 175kw @ all 4 wheels (plus this is a high flow I improted from Japan the brand is Welidin which is NISMO)

BTW I am running a stock GTR exhaust systems.

Edited by fuzzy_scuz

Didn't realise you were talking GTR sorry as the car we're discussing here is RB25DET - my bad ^_^

Munkyb0y: There's a bit to be gained from using a genuine jap high flow compared to locally produced units. BATMBL has some decent group buy items also that may be worth considering. The JustJap item comes in the $699 Turbo back system so you can imagine it's quality and flow rates given a really good cat generally costs 300+ on its own. Not to say it's not better than stock but just to point out there are better options.

In my old car I described the sensation as feeling the engine was not as 'tight' - as a stock RB25DET feels quite tight and zippy on the throttle response but you lose some of that feeling with a full turbo back exhaust with the obvious benefit being more pulling power (especially at higher revs).

that's exactly it. doesnt feel as tight/zippy. but once it starts winding out, the power feels fine.

i'm using the xforce 3 inch cat. i know its a cheap option, but better than having the standard cat restricting the system.

Edited by Munkyb0y

Changing to another Cat might get you some more power but as far as giving the car back it's response there are no cheap or easy ways that don't involve reducing total power output. The nature of turbo cars is essentially lag, run more boost, get a FMIC, get a full exhaust, all reduces initial response or give more lag but increased power/torque everywhere else. You could try borrowing a mates Cat to experiment with how they affect the car if you're that concerned.

fuzzy_scuz, what do you mean by 100% learn mode? do you mean reset the ecu?

Trust33, i didnt add anymore boost. the only change was the cat. it gained an extra ~1psi after the install.

edit: i should add that there is a unichip piggy back on the stock ecu. it was there when i got the car, i havent tuned it, but the car has always, and still does run fine, besides this recent loss of response. all in all, it's not a huge issue, but like many of you here, i'm pretty picky about my car, and i tend to notice every little thing.

Edited by Munkyb0y

You do not need to reset your ECU it is a setting within the ECU, next time you go in for a services or a tune ask the person to check when they are connected with the ECU coding console for your car.

The ECU will adjust itself accordingly if you reset it then take it for a hard drive. Resetting is very easy and basically involves disconnecting the battery and pumping the brake pedal (to drain any residual power) then reconnecting the ECU and going for a hard drive. During this period the ECU will adjust timing and listen for knock and adjust timing again accordingly as well as adjust other variables as required.

Good idea to do it after new mods.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...