Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Engine Specs-

RB30/25 VVT/forgies/prepped STD rods/bearings from KFC (ha!)

FMIC/3" exhaust/no cat/45mm Ext gate

PFC/Z32 afm/550cc inj/big pump reg

STD cams/STD head

GT35 .82 exhaust/X-Force Stainless High Mount Manifold

OK, it’s had two run in tunes and now had a hard tune after 3000Klms. It makes around 300rwkw @ 5500rpm on 17psi, BUT, any more boost than that is a waste-it wont make more power. More importantly it needs to get to at least 3800rpm before it makes good torque. That equates to 1700 RPM of good power to work with.......to me that's a narrow power range for a street engine. Although not exactly the same, my 02 WRX STi has a similar narrow power band and it's a pig in traffic! When building this I new it was not going to be a high revving thing like a 26, but I was looking forward to the torque monster the bigger 3L was meant to be. Am I expecting too much or do I need to keep developing the thing and start changing cams or maybe even the turbo? For the 3L , I thought the .82 ex was a great match for some low rpm hussle. The tuner is quite experienced with RB's and the timing map and AFR's looks pretty good. His first thought was that there might be some restriction in the exhaust side of things.... but in the mean time till we do more testing....

ANY IDEA"S GENTLEMEN?

Dyno attached for your perusal..... :)

post-26144-1169379346.jpg

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

its interesting how the torque starts to drop off at 2.2k, have you seen any other vlt dyno sheets to compare, maybe with the T03 on it.

If my net wasnt so slow capped atm, id bother loading some of the Hybrid dyno results :) nice figure 300rwkw ftw!

Cams? duration Lobe height. Intake Vs exhaust.

If you have retained the RB30 stroke, wouldnt you need more duration and lobe height than what the standard Rb25 cams has? as the Rb25 stroke is shorter right? and could be closing too early.

This is all very intersting to me cause im just doin an rb30 build for my rb25 now.

I was thinking of saying the same thing, but i deleted it lol.

yea cause my bro's vlt, torque dont drop off till probably after 3k and thats with a T03.

Nah, for a 25/30, the GT35 in the .82 IMO is the best suited turbo if your chasing a bit of power.

And the power should hold out to 6500-7000rpm pretty easily.

Definately a restriction somewhere

Its not the cams its not the exhaust restriction.

Its the std plenum. Dropping an aftermarket plenum on it and touching nothing else (bar the tune) and peak power will raise up close to 7000rpm and power will hold well to 7500rpm.

Drop some cams in to it and power will hold until ~8000rpm.

Drop cams in it with the std plenum and peak power will still be made in the same approx 5500RPM but the turbo will spool slightly earlier. So a waste of time and $$.

I believe the GT35r .82 is a touch too big for a street rb30det that doesn't rev and make good power to at least 7000rpm.

If you want to stick with the std penum don't go any bigger than the GT30r .82.

GET A PLENUM ON IT!!!! :D

I'm not speculating or guessing, I've seen it with my eyes on the dyno and then felt the power delivery before and after.

Back to back on the dyno run the plenum made a huge difference to the average usable power when running the GT35r .82 on the rb30det..

I can't comment on a plazman plenum that retains the standard runners as the plenum used on my mates rb30det was a GTR/Greedy style setup. i.e short runners. It lost no off boost power (it actually appears to have picked up a touch) and returns the same fuel economy.

Then work out why its not making any more power. It may be springs, it may be the exhaust manifold.

What occurs? You dial in more boost and det levels go crazy or does it simply flatten off and not make any more power?

We have greddy plenum and tomei poncams...with a gt30 .82ar power kept climbing upto 8500rpm. Will find out when it gets tuned soon with the gt35 .82ar how it goes. With the gt30 we were seeing full boost by 3300rpm which was 1.5bar with a 6boost manifold. With the crappy chinese s/s manifold full boost was seen around 3600rpm and was 1bar.

Id put money on what cubes is saying with the inlet manifold restricting it up high. I reckon they have wound the boost up, and the power increase has been very marginal and not worth it for the knock increase?

I just put a used XR6 GT35 1.06 rear on my 2JZ powered R31 with a $200 ebay manifold. The 2JZ has the same bore and stroke to a RB30 and with the twin cam head should be quite a similar engine response and power curve wise. 2JZ's plenum's are not restrictive so that would probably be the major difference.

My engine is stock, with stock ECU and stock auto trans etc, it has a 3.5" dump and 80mm exhaust with ebay 100mm cooler.

I am yet to put it on a dyno but it feels a lot stronger at 14psi than my old stock twin setup did at 20psi, which was dynoed at 241rwkw at 15psi. I can get 1 bar of boost up by 3500rpm in second gear, so its quite responsive given that it has the larger rear housing. Guys on the supra forums are getting 500rwhp with this turbo, some even with the .82 rear.

I have no idea what RB30DETs should be putting out but that gives you a basis for response and power comparison on a similar spec engine. Maybe Cubes is right about the plenum?

Edited by DennisRB30

Auto's make a huge difference to spool.

Another mate rb_man has an XR6t turbo (.5 comp and 1.06 iw rear) on his rb30det. That makes 1bar on the dyno by 3900rpm. It feels not too bad on the street but lacks the go in the first 2 gears compared to the .82 gt35r. Click third and it really hauls.

Auto's make a huge difference to spool.

Another mate rb_man has an XR6t turbo (.5 comp and 1.06 iw rear) on his rb30det. That makes 1bar on the dyno by 3900rpm. It feels not too bad on the street but lacks the go in the first 2 gears compared to the .82 gt35r. Click third and it really hauls.

It frys the tires in first gear and makes 1 bar by 3500 in second so that is certainly not the case with my setup. I have 4.11 gears also. But, yeah the taller gearing of the auto does help it spool a bit quicker. I was worried about lag but its not laggy at all. Another mate has a GT35 1.06 IWG with the 0.7 front on his manual VG30 R31 and its not laggy either. Must just be some prob with the RB30DET's.

Plenum maybe? Or just mismatched gears that were meant for high revving engines.

I think some of the guys with manual RB30DETs need to change their diff gears to suit the power delivery of the engine. 4.3 gears with a manual are not going to load it up enough in a light R32 or similar. I know someone who fitted taller diff gears which made the car much quicker since the turbo actually built boost in low gears.

Edited by DennisRB30
It frys the tires in first gear and makes 1 bar by 3500 in second so that is certainly not the case with my setup. I have 4.11 gears also. But, yeah the taller gearing of the auto does help it spool a bit quicker. I was worried about lag but its not laggy at all. Another mate has a GT35 1.06 IWG with the 0.7 front on his manual VG30 R31 and its not laggy either. Must just be some prob with the RB30DET's.

Plenum maybe? Or just mismatched gears that were meant for high revving engines.

I think some of the guys with manual RB30DETs need to change their diff gears to suit the power delivery of the engine. 4.3 gears with a manual are not going to load it up enough in a light R32 or similar. I know someone who fitted taller diff gears which made the car much quicker since the turbo actually built boost in low gears.

That last little bit.. Hit the nail on the head. :P

Yeh cubes...so did we. When bought from gcg it was quoted as a gt35r .82...anyway after it blew with the last motor, discopotato03 got our dead turbo and checked it out...and found out its infact a gt30r not gt35r. So gcg ripped us off...but that was several years ago and i never checked the chra number or pulled it apart and checked wheel diameter...i assumed they provided us with the right turbo. Anyway new motor is in and ready to go with the gt35r weve just been abit slack finishing off the last few lines for the dry sump system. But i think its going to be a beauty:)

yeh yeh i know. Still i think final power figure was something like 370rwkws with it which isnt too bad for a little gt30r. Im hoping we will see 400rwkws with it. Only difference with this new motor is argo rods, dry sump system, and the gt35r. When time permits a 4" exhaust system for it too to replace the damaged 3"...got crushed when running off the track. However im not sure if the 3" was being a restriction at that power level or not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...