Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

back to topic..

according to the title, I will say TD06-2og will be easy to drive around, and comes with some very good power, and if you can invest some $$ on cam gears / cams then it will be perfect..and this is back up by riding experience of Buster's car. thanks.

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I will ask buster to answer this questionin in detail..

But I will say what I saw..

Td06-20g 10cm sqr, trust manifold, front pipe,3 " exhaust system, external wastegate, Trust cooler, EVC, chipped R33 ECU..

from what can see at passenger side..spool around 3100...hard at 4000 (up) till red line...lag was there, but not what I expect..power come smoothly..

He sold the car....and the car now is in autostyle sydney..but both of us will have something similar come up soon..will keep you post.

mmm... on the other turbo's thing...

(don't shoot me i'm no expert)

I think i still have the stock t04E that came on GTS-R's.

Now my car has an RB25 though and it hits full bosst around 4300 and makes boost from around 3500 or something near that.

It produces 190rwkw @6600 on 9.5psi

at 4500 it has 120rwkw and 5500 it has around 160rwkw.

To drive it's nice, and between gears i don't drop 1,500 rpm (maybe i have modded box, no idea though), so i can stay on full boost in every gear.

I know that a t04 is like super old technology and stuff but you can mix/match the exhaust and front housings/wheels i think ??

And from what i've heard they aren't all that expensive. Like approx $1500-$2000 ?

just a thought that's open to discussion as i wouldn't mind learning some stuff :D

Usually on the compressor or front housing, and the exhaust or turbine housing.

Turbine housing is pretty important to determining when a turbo will come on boost, the smaller the housing, the sooner the boost comes on - the trade off being you wont have as much top end. The sort of power you are making is easily acheivable with a stock turbo, but they tend to come on boost just over 2K with a good exhaust setup.

If I had to guess, I would say that your exhaust AR ratio is a little on the large side.

EDIT: also the T04E isnt a small turbo for a 2.5

NFI!

i've got this extractor cover/shield thing. I'll get it off in the next day or two and have a look.

I do know though that the mouth (where it sucks air in) is reasonably big.

mmm, i've seen cars achieve what i am with the stock turbo, but they are all running more than 9psi of boost ?!?

Yes, true, but think about this: my car runs 12.5psi has a stock turbo and makes boost from 2000rpm full boost by 2500 and 203 rwkw peak,

You have 120rwkw at 4500,

I make 120rwkw at about 3300rpm, by 4500 I am making 165

rwkw. By the time your engine is making 160kw, mine has made 190.

It takes you nearly 1000 rpm to make your 9.5psi, I can get 12psi in about half that and it starts 1500 rpm earlier.

Which setup, if both were fitted to the same car do you think would make a quicker car?

Now, if you could make 12.5psi by 3000rpm...

Originally posted by sidewaymambo

I will ask buster to answer this questionin in detail..

But I will say what I saw..

Td06-20g 10cm sqr, trust manifold, front pipe,3 " exhaust system, external wastegate, Trust cooler, EVC, chipped R33 ECU..

from what can see at passenger side..spool around 3100...hard at 4000 (up) till red line...lag was there, but not what I expect..power come smoothly..  

He sold the car....and the car now is in autostyle sydney..but both of us will have something similar come up soon..will keep you post.

yep Phil you hit the nail on the head all I can see you missed is the 550 inj, Bosch fuel pump and Z32 afm

It did start to spool in the low 3000rpm's and had full 1.1 bar by 4000rpm the boost did come on pretty harshly hahaha all in all I think the set up is great when you look at the cost of one of these turbo's and how cheap they are to have rebuilt

Hi Guys, I posted this before....

Graph peaks at around 308 rwkw at 196 kph which would be 7,250 rpm allowing for 27 kph per thousand RPM. That means at 108 kph (around 4,000 rpm) it has 93 rwkw

So if you changed gear at 7,000 rpm in first the engine would have 300 rwkw and would drop to 4,000 rpm in second where it had 93 rwkw. It would then struggle to accelerate the car until it got to around 5,000 rpm when the power jumps to 180 rwkw. This would indicate not very much boost under 5,000 rpm.

Simple table follows; as shown on the TD06 dyno graph on page 1

At 7,000 rpm it has 300 rwkw

At 6,000 rpm it has 250 rwkw

At 5,000 rpm it has 195 rwkw

At 4,000 rpm it has 93 rwkw

That's an average of 210 rwkw.

This would make, firstly a fairly slow accelerating car through the gears as it has a relatively low average amount of power (210 rwkw) compared to its maximum. Secondly this would make it very difficult to drive as it would be constantly moving from over 300 rwkw to under 200 rwkw with only a 1,500 rpm drop in revs.

I would say that the turbo is too big and the car would be faster with a smaller turbo, say one with a 260 rwkw maximum. Power table like this;

At 7,000 rpm it has 260 rwkw

At 6,000 rpm it has 240 rwkw

At 5,000 rpm it has 200 rwkw

At 4,000 rpm it has 170 rwkw

That's an average of 220 rwkw.

Higher average therefore faster accelerating and it would only drop from 260 rwkw to around 220 rwkw in the same 1,500 rpm bracket. Result = much easier to drive.

Hope that made sense.

*Now, read it, and stop talking about TD06's unless you all own a Mitsubishi Canter*

Sorry, that was way too harsh....had the 5am blues....rally didn't mean to say that like that...I meant to say

"now, stop talking about it

unless you own a Mitsubishi canter....."

In that i beleieve everything had been talked about here, and all the numbers have been shown... not that they are crap turbos so don't talk about them...i did not mean that

I honestly have no doubts that the TD06 could be a very effective turbo. I personally believe that running one on a 2.5 litre engine is not the best option. On a 3litre + engine i believe that could be very good, and would spool up 25% earlier. I have seen one on a diesel Hilux that was VERY interesting

I'm sorry if that sounded like me telling you you picked the wrong turbo, or that you are all worong, i really didn't mean that. I have personally never driven a car with a TD06..or for that matter any Trust turbos. I have driven a toyota hilux with one....that was scary. But the numbers coming out of the dyno graphs all seem to say the same thing, and spool up, at the bet off an RB25 was 4,000 rpm.... And i believe that does not add up to a very streetable turbo. But i could be wrong

Son of Sydneykid - Amended by Son of Sydneykid

..................................quote......................................

Now, read it, and stop talking about TD06's unless you all own a Mitsubishi Canter

..................................quote......................................

Hi, SydneyKid..thanks for the replied (not the ....quote.....part), and be honestly I do learn from it..but Were the fact and theory are brothers? Were they sometime back up each other and sometime don't due to some reason? I don't drive a canter, just what I saw is a bit different then theory..please don't take it as offense (I know you don't...hahaha..thanks.)

If there is any chance, we do love to offer you a drive..and maybe you can help us to find out why?..thaks

If I was to consider either a rework of my turbo or a garett combo what in your experience gives the best performance. Mick from Subzero now works were I take my car to so he says an exhaust manifold helps alot plus you know his plenums. For interest to back this up he is doing a standard turbo with exhaust manifold. Its on a friends car so should be interesting.

I would like to see 250rwkw for wank factor plus I believe this is a reasonable level to get to before needing injectors and maybe other internal mods. I have all else required.

So I could look at a Garett 3040 or a 3035. I would prefer to keep my origonal turbo however could have that reworked. End of the day though these all seem to pan out to the same cost.

Thanks

Hi Grepin

250rwkw is not a whole lot really. this is easily achievable with the hi flow, for a fraction of the cost... it simply bolts straight back onto the original exhaust manifold... very simple. you do not need such a large turbo for these figures. It is far simple and far more cost effective to simply get a Hi Flow job done on the existing turbo. Save the cash you save from not buying a new turbo and use it elsewhere on the car.

Son of Sydneykid

hey rob

it isn't the most effecient manifold, but for the 250rwkw, its sufficient... It is not an equal lenth manifold.... but its not worth spending the cash on another unless you are going way further than 250rwkw...In my opinion...but i will ask the old man

Son of Sydneykid

I guess I should have stated that to get 250rwkw that the standard manifold will do. However would a nicely designed manifold make it work all the better. I guess the proof will be in the car that is keeping the stock turbo however getting a manifold. Certainly a different way of going about things. Consider if I havent got it wrong it may be possible to get more top end out of a set up manifold. Like how it can be said that a larger turbo can be brought on boost earlier by a specifically designed manifold.

Sydneykid, so you havent had much experience with Garett turbos like 3040 etc. Cost wise considering Sacrifice $500 worth of turbo for a $2400 (GCG price) rebuild is more expensive than buying a Garett turbo (from $2300). Given the fact that I want to keep all my stock parts I would prefer to keep my turbo. The only reason to rebuild it is if it would be far superior than a garett turbo.

Cheers.

I hope I finally get it right when I do comit to something. Its even more frustrating when you have the money but no idea what to do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...