Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I keep comapring all results to Sydney kids original rb30 engine.

475hp on engine dyno, using old t04e and standard everything on 1 bar boost..

anyway.. great results.

Some numbers to think about;

475 bhp = 355 kw

less 60 kw for losses = 295 rwkw

The engine dyno room is airconditioned at 21C , no radiator, oil cooler etc so you don't get as much heat soak as you do in the engine bay of a car on a roller dyno. The intercooler sits in a tub of water (no ice), so the temp is pretty constant. Plus we tuned the ever living crap out of it, spent 3 days on getting the maps absolutely perfect. There might be 15-20 kw advantage in all of that.

So I reckon 297 rwkw at 17 psi is damn fine effort OFENSV, well done.:D

Through a RB25DET 5 speed.

I found it quite interestering the before and after...

No doubt air temps and dyno differences make a difference. But non the less it was interestering to note.

I can't remember exactly how much boost, it was running but it was somewhere around the mid 20's.

For those interestered I went for a little drive and did a complete map trace.

Lots of light load cruise and a bit of spirited driving through the hills.

A few WOT's to 6000rpm also.

RB20DET PFC, RB30DET, Stock RB20DET Turbo that initially hits 12psi then tails off to 8-9psi rather quickly.

interesting piece of trivia:

the 152-tooth Dayco 94407 timing belt is the same as that used on the Audi (Passat?) 1.8 litre twin turbo engines in their newer model cars. it is, however, much more expensive to buy it from an Audi dealer, trust me!

Cubes i have NFI what that 5hit means.

also: the 94407 is 25mm wide, but in the DIYrb30DET guide it says that it is 30mm wide. can anyone confirm that theirs is 30mm?

RPM points are the X axis every 400rpm, starting from 400rpm.

Load points are the Y Axis.

I didn't actually measure my belt. It did however fill up the complete cam gear with only a mm or two to spare, so what ever the cam gear width is is pretty much what the 94407 belt is.

interesting - the RB30 crankshaft drive cog for the cam belt is 25.4mm wide, the same as the RB30 timing belt and the belt i just bought from the audi.

the RB25 cam gears are 30mm wide, as are the RB30. i assume this is to allow for a bit of belt movement as there is no lip to guide it on to these.

are you guys using RB25 harmonic balancers and timing belt drive cogs, or are you using RB30 drive cogs? the 25 ones could be wider?

with my RB30 drive cog there is no way i could get a 30mm timing belt on there, that's all.

yep i'd say the DIY guide is a bit misleading in that regard, all the RB series timing belts are 25.4mm i would suggest.

a 30mm belt would NOT fit on any of the drive cogs, which are just barely the width of the belt. if the belt is enough for a 1.8L quad cam twin turbo it should be good enough for me, using standard cams and springs in addition keeps the loads down on the belt.

i have an R33 DE head - i believe the cams and springs are the same as the DET, only difference is injectors.

I've just had a look at the guide and it doesn't state anywhere the width of the 94407 belt.

It does state that the gates belt has been cut down from 30mm to 25mm in the factory.

I don't really know I used that information from some one else so it's only hearsay.

I'll find that rb20det belt and measure the sucker. :rofl:

hi guys just a quick question about head gaskets. i don't under stand squish zones. i have a rb30 with a r32 25de head, i am going to use stock pistons. which head gasket would be best, what thickness as well?

sorry if this has been covered before.

thanks

interesting piece of trivia:  

the 152-tooth Dayco 94407 timing belt is the same as that used on the Audi (Passat?) 1.8 litre twin turbo engines in their newer model cars. it is, however, much more expensive to buy it from an Audi dealer, trust me!

Yes that's right, it suits the 1.8L motor used in VW passats and Audi A4's. Going by engine codes they would be the same motor.

The belts costs approx $40 from most auto parts shops.

I'd check my 94407 belt but its stored among the other parts.

well that's sorted - also the front-on picture given in the guide which shows the measurements where the tensioner hole needs to be drilled are spot on cubes, i put mine there and it will tension perfectly once i've tapped the hole.

did anyone use return springs on their two tensioners?

yeah they are locking, i wonder why there's a return spring on the RB30 tensioners, they're the same as the 25 ones i'm 99% sure? anyway i'm using two RB30 tensioners on mine and a friend's 25/30 doesn't use return springs either.

p.s. where do you get new studs for them from? they have two different threads on each end :confused: which is weird, i imagine they'd have to come from nissan..... i shudder to think of the price

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
    • Hi guys . Can someone help me  I bought an Android screen for my Nissan fuga but it won't turn on   
    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
×
×
  • Create New...