Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I updated my piston list from P221

WISECO

Skyline RB30 w/ DOHC RB25det cylinder head

1.260" compresion height, 66.5cc head chamber, Dish top -11.3cc, 7.0:1 compression ratio, 21mm pin, 1mm gasket thickness, 1mm deck clearance.

K577M865 86.5mm

K577M87 87.00mm

U might wanna ask cubes about this as he and i are running the m87 rb25 pistons and have around the 9:1 comp ratio

Edited by Bl4cK32

To do the job right you need to do the following:

• rebush the small end to suit 21mm or 22mm pins – whatever you are using

• clearance ( machine ) the big end of the rod and small end side clearances so they fit on the big end journal of the crank and in the piston – as they are wider in std form

• you need to have the big end bearing machined in the rod at the same time otherwise it sticks out past the rod and wont fit on the journal

• machine the big end of the rod so it fits down the bore – as they are wider than the bore in std form and wont go down the bore

• then resize the big end tunnel after all that machining – as it distorts the big end tunnel clearances

• grind the crank approx 7 thou ( from memory ) to suit the rods with 40 thou oversize chev bearings

Its not a cheap exercise to get it done correctly

please shed some info as far as bearings and or mods required for the rods?
I updated my piston list from P221

Added a new p/n for a flat top piston from Arias and added compression ratios for the Arias pistons. Two are quite high for a turbo engine!

Suit RB30/26

p/n= AP332103

flat top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 8.4-8.6

VHR32: Are these parts number off Arias catalog or is it a custom job part number?? I was looking over Arias current catalog and these numbers are not on the list.?!?

VHR32: Are these parts number off Arias catalog or is it a custom job part number?? I was looking over Arias current catalog and these numbers are not on the list.?!?

They are Rocket industries part numbers, they get them made from Arias and stock them here in Australia.

I have these, they also suit 25 as listed by Rocket industries.

All pistons suit 25 and 26 head, 26 has slightly lower compression due to the larger chamber.

What c/r did yours turn out to be?

What sort of boost do you run?

Has much timing been put into it?

Gary - what fuel filter is available that wont restrict the new fuel lines that Im about to install ? As most seem to be smaller than the 9 mm fuel hose ?

Cheers

From memory, Dash 6 fittings, they bolt straigh to the pump and 9 mm ID hose.

Under the car using the standard fuel rail clamps.

I use the standard feed pipework as the return and remove the standard return pipework.

On the R32GTST, I used the HICAS pipework, it was there, in the right place and plenty big enough.

:D cheers :D

Hey

Can you work out the ACL one please? i got ACL pistons on in mine and when i do a compression test it sits at 120 in each cyl. the numbers on the top are

RA9608x 0.50 RIB 0.10 SE

Id like to know how low it is - i dont know if these are VL turbo ones or not - they do sit right up to the top of the block though. here is some pics

I updated my piston list from P221

Added a new p/n for a flat top piston from Arias and added compression ratios for the Arias pistons. Two are quite high for a turbo engine!

CP

All compression ratios are based on zero deck height, 1.2mm head gasket (7.13cc), RB25 @ 62.5cc, RB26 @ 64.5cc. They assure me they have done alot of work to make sure the facts are correct.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20

Flat top with no valve pockets

8.2:1 COMPRESSION RATIO with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20-9.0

6.0cc dome top,

9.0:1 COMPRESSION RATIO with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

*Care must be taken when using on RB26 with more than 11.5mm valve lift*

ARIAS

Suit RB30/26

p/n= AP332103

flat top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 8.4-8.6

Suit RB30/26

p/n= AP332104

10.6cc dome top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 9.2-9.4

Suit RB30/25

p/n= AP332105

13cc dome top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 9.5-9.8

WISECO

Skyline RB30 w/ DOHC RB25det cylinder head

1.260" compresion height, 66.5cc head chamber, Dish top -11.3cc, 7.0:1 compression ratio, 21mm pin, 1mm gasket thickness, 1mm deck clearance.

K577M865 86.5mm

K577M87 87.00mm

ACL

6MKRY9608 (VL turbo)

87mm, -4.5cc dished top, 1.261" compression height, 21mm pin,

Standard RB30ET pistons are 7.8:1, with RB25 head it is 7.1:1

These are bumped up to 8.5:1 so with the RB25 head it may give about 7.5:1??

Using http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html I came up with 8.5 for VLT (spot on) and 7.6 with twin cam head with 64cc chamber.

I entered: 2, 87, 85, 87, 1.2, 64cc, -4.5cc = 7.6:1

BUT these have a lower compression height than the CP/Arias and im sure it stuffs up my calculations but its late and im too tired to look at it any more... :D

post-1240-1173332316.jpg

yeah - you'd have to cc everything and then work out how much to take off the head to get the comp your after.

Higher comp gives better off boost respose, better fuel economy and if your tuner is good ( I know your tuning it - so no offense implied :D ) you should be able to make good power on lower boost.

Mine has no detonation at 18psi on 100 Shel V power, and Im hoping to run 22 plus psi.

after talking with steve from QRI he told me that for mainly street with occassional drag the p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20-9.0 would be the best ones to go for as with the rb26 head comp would drop down slightly which is where id want to go... ill just be using total seal gapless rings, as we've used them many times on other cars and prefer them

ben...

They are Rocket industries part numbers, they get them made from Arias and stock them here in Australia.

All pistons suit 25 and 26 head, 26 has slightly lower compression due to the larger chamber.

What c/r did yours turn out to be?

What sort of boost do you run?

Has much timing been put into it?

The motor is 95% complete.

Rocket/ARIAS are pretty much spot on when they say the AP332104 set makes 9.2 - 9.4:1 with a stock head, I calculated, it to be 9.3:1 based on 63cc bowls.

My R33 25 head has been resurfaced at least twice so when cc'ing the bowls they came to 58CC's, with a (1.3MM) stock head gasket the CR for my motor came to 10:1 comp.

I'm aiming for 9:1 so I'm looking for a MLS headgasket almost double standard.

The thickest I've found so far is this:- CMC4323-074 Cometic - Multi Layer Steel Head Gasket

Rb30det 3.0l 87mm Bore .074"(1.88mm) Thick. Which would make 9.5:1 comp.

At the moment the other option is to have one custom made. :)

Edited by Alf

Mines an interesting setup. :S

I run the Wiseco RB25 pistons with a supposive 14cc dome and 1.240" pin height. 0.051" Cometic Headgasket 62cc combustion chamber.

The rods have been resized etc. Unsure how this will affect how the piston sits in the bore.

The engine builder said he was decking the block 0.040" due to the rb25's lower pin height. (1.240 vs 1.280)

If the block has been decked 0.040" which would result in an expected 0deck height then that would achieve a comp ratio of 10:1. :S

But I'm sure thats not the case as all cylinders only have ~154psi and have done so since day one.

If the deck height is 0.040" that drops the comp ratio down to ~9:1. But still 154psi for 9:1? Sounds a little low. BUT the stock rb25de n/a cams will be bleeding a little of that compression off as they do run a little more overlap compared to stock turbo cams.

Either way my tuner believes the comp is down around 8.5:1 ish according to the amount of ignition he runs vs boost level and power.

So who knows lol. :S

It does return excellent fuel economy though. Local short trips etc i'm getting mid 10's to low 11 litres per 100km's.

It does feel a hell of a lot more responsive than a mates GTS4 rb30det BUT that is running a much larger turbo, 250kg odd heavier car + my head has had quite a bit of porting/polishing and valve deshrouding done all of which helps.

Kastin,

You are correct, as I said in my post cam shaft specs (overlap etc) influence the guage reading/dynamic compression.

So given 2 cars with identical static comp ratio's and identical cam shaft specs both 'should' read near identical on the same guage.

I'm interested to know what radiator, fan, mods to reduce heak soak etc... you guys use for your 9:1 +15Psi motors and how well is the heat controlled in traffic and when giving it some stick.

I'm paranoid as it is with the stock rb20 in peak hour traffic. :)

This is what I've got planned for mine:

Ceramic coated and dry lubed ARIAS pistons :- done.

Ceramic coated valves :-done.

EF twin 12" thermos :-done

19 row oil cooler with thermo fan :-done.

Alloy double pass radiator :-coming soon.

Breather tank : coming soon

Mod inlet manifold for 3 extra coolant lines. :- coming soon

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/up...9_514_47789.jpg

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/up...9_514_50972.jpg

Edited by Alf

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...