Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

John, nothing in particular as far as the actual intended compression ratios. Build it for what you want to get from it. Easier to drive more average power and more responsive but less peak power go hi comp, dyno queen go low comp with peaky massive turbo :)

Mark (Scooby) that should be decent, but my 26 made 260 on the stock computer. Go back for refund or more power. :huh: Good luck after run in.

Steve the cams and I understand crank angle sensor are different but all else is the same. I see you are racing at the "Bank". Let us know next time you run and I'll round up the boys from the Switch to come watch and ponder just why anyone would be so silly with a 120 :)

In for sure Geoff, Havnt seen that 120 ynot out their to date. Should be an interesting toy.

On the oil pump issue, I went the Jun not for the High volume flow but simply because it is touted as a stronger more reliable pump than the N1. Also did the collar deal as extra insurance.

Steve the cams and I understand crank angle sensor are different but all else is the same. I see you are racing at the "Bank". Let us know next time you run and I'll round up the boys from the Switch to come watch and ponder just why anyone would be so silly with a 120 :huh:

AHAHAHA I sure will Geoff, and thanks... I think my mate is crazy fitting a 2JZ into a HR Holden and expecting to come away from Summernats in one piece.

OK here's a question for the airflow gurus, Geoff that means you. :nyaanyaa:

The 26/30 will not allow use of the standard airbox in the R32 GTR easily. Obvious choice is to use pods but extra height of the RB30 makes it quite difficult to accomodate pods with any kind of meaningful airbox.

I'm thinking of feeding both AFMs by having them draw air from the back of one big arse pod filter, which could be accomodated by cutting a hole in the area immediately below the airbox.

The filter area would be ample, and construction of the airbox would be relatively easy. If you look on the SSS Automotive website you'll see that their blue Improved Production car runs this type of system.

Any thoughts / ideas on this approach?

Edited by Scooby

I use that location for my air filter but there are problems.

When it rains or the road is wet the spray can be taken up, and that sends the AFMs into error as the ECU thinks they are maxing out. The right thing to do then is box it correctly to remove the spray from the NSF tyre from the problem. I'm yet to examine the effects from following closely a car putting up serious spray.

Also the location is very dirty due to the tyre proximity.

I use that location for my air filter but there are problems.

When it rains or the road is wet the spray can be taken up, and that sends the AFMs into error as the ECU thinks they are maxing out. The right thing to do then is box it correctly to remove the spray from the NSF tyre from the problem. I'm yet to examine the effects from following closely a car putting up serious spray.

Also the location is very dirty due to the tyre proximity.

Due to the plastic wheel arch guard I'm not sure what the problem would be from NSF tyre? I can see that on the 32 GTR there would be an issue with spray coming in through the vent in the front bar but I'd counter that by making a shield.

Any thoughts on feeding the two AFMs from one big filter?

No problem with that at all. Unless there is a serious restriction on either intake path the action of the turbos will pretty much equalise intake, as well the afm signals are averaged in the PFC.

That guard liner is about as secure as a leaf in a hurricane. Both mine on the track car ripped out at about 200kmh.

No problem with that at all. Unless there is a serious restriction on either intake path the action of the turbos will pretty much equalise intake, as well the afm signals are averaged in the PFC.

That guard liner is about as secure as a leaf in a hurricane. Both mine on the track car ripped out at about 200kmh.

Thanks Geoff

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
    • There are guys on Facebook under, Infiniti Owners Australia   https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1Z3RbPqx4k/?mibextid=wwXIfr What Whp are you after and I can help, and join this Q group in the states. https://www.facebook.com/share/g/19A59cN3JR/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • Does any of you guys have instagram pages for your builds? Keen to see some Aussie builds. I still can't figure out how to post photos in here.
    • That awesome thanks for that. 
    • You can Remote any of these VR30..globally  Check: AMS Performance | Racebox | Sonic Tune | Soho | Z Motorsports | Specialty Z    Performance Parts | AMS | Z Motorsports | Boosted 6 |    Exhaust | Fast Intentions | ARK | MBRP Motordyne | Borla    There is someone in Sydney with 650whp   I am at 430whp without flex fuel, but FBO & Flex-fuel will push you to 500whp!!  
×
×
  • Create New...