Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure what the charge is to grind the crank snout and fit a collar is - as I had mine built up and machined and that was approx $250.

Grinding is around $150 ish

Nitriding is around $350 ish as the crank has to be ground, nitrided and then reground to size.

Those prices are ball park figures.

Ring and ask for Dave.

Edited by Spoolup
Just out of curiosity what would be involved in fitting an RB25/30 to a 180sx???

A rough price estimate would be great too if possible...

Thanks.

How are we meant to know... This is SAU. :down:

Head down the local performance workshop and quiz them. :P

Ok :) lol

I just thought someone on here may have done it before.

As far as the conversion though would you say it would be identical to an RB25 conversion ie. same crossmember, mounts etc...?

ps. I have owned Skylines before and realise that people on SAU have a lot of knowledge and experience with RB engines which is why I asked here, I wasn't trying to upset anyone and if I have I apologise.

Ok :) lol

I just thought someone on here may have done it before.

As far as the conversion though would you say it would be identical to an RB25 conversion ie. same crossmember, mounts etc...?

ps. I have owned Skylines before and realise that people on SAU have a lot of knowledge and experience with RB engines which is why I asked here, I wasn't trying to upset anyone and if I have I apologise.

look into the rb25/20 conversions and check heights .. as the extra 38mm i believe would be alot more trouble in the S chassis, i could be wrong though

Just out of curiosity what would be involved in fitting an RB25/30 to a 180sx???

A rough price estimate would be great too if possible...

Thanks.

hi mate it wont fit. guy here has a rb25det in a s14 and the bonnet wont shut, so he bent it in a bow shape to shut, cars a track car so not to bad, but looks shite. :laugh:

Edited by rockabilly

I'm looking at removing the powerFC from my RB30DET for use in another car.

The engine is using a standard RB25 loom and injectors/sensors, the only difference being I don't use a boost sensor.

What are the chances of simply plugging-and-playing a standard R33 computer into it and driving away?

The standard r33 ecu is more than capable of running the 25/30DET, but the base/factory tune will be rubbish and would need to be retuned/chipped anyway.

Cheers, so by retuned, is it a simple task of just adjusting the CAS and whatever else to work with the slightly different engine, or are we talking a major effort to get it up and running? Also, without the boost sensor will it do stupid things (like retard the timing)?

I assume from your statements that you are running a D-Jetro PFC (MAP sensor)?

To run it on a standard ECU you will need to throw an AFM in there. I will also guess that it will max the standard AFM pretty much straight away and run in R&R most of the time..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...