Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mine does 100km/h at 3875rpm.

So the calculation is pretty spot on given the R33's have a higher diff ratio.

Thats pretty insane really thinking that he is making at 3500rpm what I am making at 7000rpm and the funny thing is I also have more lag!

wahahahha.. :)

I noticed the inlet valves are quite large.

They basically fill the while side of the chamber.

Would be hard to fit larger ones unless you were to move away from circle valves.

When I get the RB20DET out i'll take photo's of its head and show compare photo's with the RB25 head.

had to travel 1000+ks but it was worth it,

280hp at wheels with 14psi boost(did see peak 300hp but dyno sheet says 280)

for those who dont know i have bolted the 25t head onto a rb30 na bottom ,im still running the 25t ecu,turbo,injectors,intercooler,etc

mobs are simply K&N pod full 4inch exhaust and elect boost controller

had problems with my original bleed valve making spikes up to 17psi and causing boost cut had to buy and fit a ebc

fuel mixtures were fine, still running rich at full boost though ,obviously the 370cc injectors are up to the task

the only thing that caused concern was the timing having to run at 27deg advance to preform ,this had the dyno mech rather confused ,a few degrees more and detonation was heard

SYDNEY KID/ Anyone do you have any idea why the hybrid has to run so advanced to make power do i need adjustable cam gears?????

all the same ,im very impressed with the cheeap hp, sure beats forged pistons/aftermarket ecu on cost

cheers

Depends on the wheels he is running.

Mine does 3875rpm at 100km/h and at 3500rpm its doing 95km/h.

I just worked it out with a 4.11:1 diff ratio and it is 3500rpm at 100km/h.

This is using stock wheel sizes.

Remember we are going off a Dyno printout here and it won't be accurate.

i.e 100km/h on the rollers isn't going to be 100km/h on the road.

Ahh close enough then.

BTW, changing the wheel size won't do anything to change what your speedo says at any given engine RPM.

I would have thought that the dyno would have been more accurate at telling actual road speed than any car speedo because wheel size would not be an issue (but the speedo would read wrong if you changed wheel size, which would throw out any calculations based on dyno speed)

Wheel size does make a difference what your speedo reads.

If you run a small arsed 13" wheel your spedo is going to be saying that you are doing 130km/h when you are only doing say 90km/h.. .:D

But yer.. I would have also thought that a dyno would have been more accurate BUT.. when I had mine done it was way off with the speeds.

"If you run a small arsed 13" wheel your spedo is going to be saying that you are doing 130km/h when you are only doing say 90km/h.. "

Yeah, but your tacho will still say 3500rpm (or whatever) when your speedo says 100km/h (in the respective gear). You could throw your wheels taishaft and diff into the ocean and that would not change :D

doesn't matter what size wheel you have, as long as the profile tyre is right. You can have a 19" wheel with a 20 profile tyre (if they exist), and that will be the same diameter across from tyre edge to tyre edge as a 15" wheel with a 90 profile... i know these aren't exact, but i'm just using them as an example. If you had a 19" with a 30 profile and a 15" with a 30 profile then the diameter's of each wheel from tyre edge to tyre edge will be different.

Thats true Gijor33.. BUT.. I had 16" 225 50' VR GTS 16's on my VS commodore. When I went to slap the spare on the arse end it was slightly higher. It wasn't much (1.5-2cm's) but it was enough to cause the car to steer left when accelerating and steer right when decelerating.

Who really matches their new wheels up to the standard sizing. Not many if any :D

Hey all.....

First of all, Excellent Thread. BLOODY TERIFFIC MATES.

After reading all of this thread i have come to the conclusion that the series 2 commondoor block is the best for the conversion as it has all the oil/water inlets and returns and what not, for the turbo applaction...

Now my QUESTION is, how do you tell the difference between the series 1 & series 2 blocks????????

I live in brisbane, so some of the wreckers up here are a bit dodgey and would prob try and sell me a series 1 block if they did not have a series 2.....

SOOOO it would be good to be able to tell the difference betwwen the 2.

Thanks in advance people ;) ;) ;):D;)

i am chasing 250rwkw+ to get my boat moving.

I'm wondering how much power the stock pistons(NA VL) will cope with before they explode. Would the strength and longevity/power produced be increased by cryo/heat treating the stock NA pistons?

*i have gone back thru the thread to look for my answer too :D*

I have read the entire thread and would like to ask a few questions:

1. Will the engine fit straight into the engine bay or will there have to be modifications of engine mounts etc etc?

2. If this conversion is so easy and the end result a powerful engine....why didn't Nissan ever develop and include the RB30DET in one of there cars?

Cheers.

Pistons longevity is probably more related to tune than outright power.

I would think that if you can make that sort of power with an RB25DET on stock (9:1 CR) internals, an RB30 with RB25 head and NA pistons would be just as easy to achieve as the CR is a bit lower, therefore less prone to detonation - which is the real enemy of the pistons, not power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...