Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got mine Installed & tuned (Dyno & Road) for $3600. 7000K Is a bit steep.. considering the only real diffrence between SMC & 2 is launch control + the extra auxs. But it depends on your application and how much money your willing to throw on a ECU.

Re sumps

the 25t sump has some fins (2) at the rear end above the baffle plate ,rb30 sump doesnt have ,these fins touch the crankshaft and sound just like a run bearing!!!!!!!,strangley it couldnt be heard or felt when turning the motor over by hand before installing,quite heart breaking having to remove motor to fix this but relief to find this rather than a bearing!!

so remove fins from 25t sump or use rb30 sump

Originally posted by alkaline

How about using the twin turbo setup from the GTR rather then a TO3?

i believe it would require a fair mid of modification to the exhaust manaifold to adapt the rb26 exhaust manifold onto the rb25 head.

i think the t03 would run out of puff early to due to the extra flow. and if your using a vl turbo t3 you'd need an adapter plate? to use on the rb25 exhaust manifold, correct?

So would a GTR twin turbo flange from an R32 fit onto a R33 or R34 RB25 head? Is the RB26 T4 flange? I just dont want to be on boost all the time, rb25 turbo seems too small for an RB30.

On that note what would be the best cams to get for the RB25 head as well in combination with the 9:1 compression ratio and GTR twin turbo setup. That is of course if the GTR turbo mounts on to the head with out too much problems?

You'd have to get a new zorst manifold flange made, because the individual flange bits go in different directions. From what I've heard, you can't just cut off the old one and weld a new one on, because it'll be a weak point, and you're trying to support a heavy turbo on it.

yes joel thats normal

the way the vl head is designed, some valves are angled like that on one side(eg cyl 1,2,3) the others are angled / (eg cyl 4,5,6)

so instead of making specific pistons for each cylinder they chose to make the pistons with both recesses. Therefore when you look at the pistons it looks as if they were designed for a multivalve head.

  • 2 weeks later...

yeah, but what would u do with the other one, seeing as the rb30 only has room for 1? Can it be left just taped up to the side of the engine bay, or does it need to be connected?

/edit - what if this coversion had a power fc also? would it detect something was wrong, etc?

would need to be connected or else the ecu wont be getting any input and i belive it may put the car into a safe mode/limp home mode.

not too sure.. can another sensor be screwed in? i do not know about that for sure sorry.

Originally posted by Bl4cK32

yeah, but what would u do with the other one, seeing as the rb30 only has room for 1? Can it be left just taped up to the side of the engine bay, or does it need to be connected?

RB30 block actually already has 3 knock sensor positions drilled and tapped on the block ready for the sensors to be screwed in.

RB30ET only has one knock sensor, and it's right in the middle (between cyl 3 and 4)

The 2 other sensor holes are in exactly the same position as on RB2xDET, so you just take them from your old engine and screw them in...no problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...