Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What the? Care to explain the whole story?

hey all

the white 33 was my mate, poor guy!

his bad luck just doesnt end.

i wasnt there though, apparently my friend was waiting in the middle of the intersection at the lights waiting for the oncoming cars to stop so he could turn right. the lights went orange and a truck booted it through the intersection. Out from behind the truck was a white SS VS Commodore driver booting it as well. as my friend turned right. "bang"

IMPACT ON HIS FRONT LEFT guard, TYRE, spun him (r33) 360 degrees around. air bag popped out and pretty much saved his life as the impact propelled him forward with his head nearly hitting the steering wheel

FUEL started leaking out of the SS, the battery in the ss Commodore shorted and create the explosion and subsequent fire.

though at this early stage the details are alil sketchy.

From all reports the SS driver admitted to my mate that he was travelling 65-70 kms in a 60 zone.

Result:

No one injured, SS written off. r33 sedan impact on left hand side. engine not affected.

just thought i would update everyone,

cheers

Was it still orange when the commo came through the intersection??

hey mate,

sorry i really dont know if it was still orange when the commodore came through,

the cop reckons if the witness on the motorbike can definitely say that the light was orange, then they can pin the commo, but thats still a lil sketchy.

all i know is that its going to be a pricey repair bill.

cheers

even so the commo driver already stated 65-70km/h and as ur friend was already in the intersection it is still the commos fault.

true! good point!

Again an interesting thought...

my friend overheard the conversation with the commo driver and the cop.

the commo driver told the cop that he was travelling 70 odd. the cop asked him "did you know this is a 60 zone?"

the commo driver quickly changed his story and claimed that he was only driving 65km/h. still it really depends on what the witnesses say because at the end of the day its one persons word against the other.

To make things worse my friend copped a fine as well ontop of damaged r33, not sure what the SS driver got. The ss driver has full comp insurance while my friend only had third party. The cops only write the report, i think its up to the insurace company to determine who was at fault. isnt it done by percentages??

cheers!

Edited by R33LIN
ah thats rubbiash hopefully skyline driver doesnt get bent over

truck going through on yellow you would hope noone is following

Its not rubbish, hes in the wrong. How would you like it if you were going through an orange light and someone pulled in front of you? Sure he was speeding and making a mad dash, however he should have waited until there was no cars, its not like he was going so fast he couldn't see him, or the light was blatantly red. He has no defence his insurance will have to pay out.

In those situations you should be extra careful as LOTS of accidents happen that way, and a lot of people do the mad dash for the orange light. A good habbit my dad taught me was if you are in that situation and going through an orange with the possibility of someone turning right in front of you is flash your high beams so they can be certain you are going through.

Edited by Rolls

um sorry man yellow does not mean speed up it mean caution STOP he clearly would of had time to stop if he wasnt doing 70 and though Ah trucks going through ill go as well

i agree the line should of waited too untill all trafic was through even if that means waiting till his light is fully red and other cars are beeping @ him, the other cars waiting for there green light can see his predigament and will wait for him to leave the intersection

all in all commo driver should cop huge find and be @ fault even if the cop takes his 2nd awnser of 65kph hes still 5kph over the limit

no doubt both parties are at fault, so no point arguing it :)

Your automatically 12% in the wrong for just being in your car on the road in the first place. No doubt everyone will cop a fine, but the actual payouts/claims will be determined by how much % each party was at fault.

My mate had same situation happen to him. He was coming thorugh an orange light, but wasnt speeding. Driver turning saw it went orange and just freaked, then turned infront of my mate, and both had a bad head on which resulted in my mate kissing the steering wheel. Wasnt my mates fault, as he wasnt speeding, but he still was deemed to be part responsible for it..

Hope no-one was seriously hurt, and everyone learnt a lesson...

Your automatically 12% in the wrong for just being in your car on the road in the first place. No doubt everyone will cop a fine, but the actual payouts/claims will be determined by how much % each party was at fault.

Actually, I'd like to see where it says that in the law/regs/statutes.

I hear that alot but no one comes up with where it says that just for being on the road you are at fault for an accident. I had a friends insurance company try this on him a few years ago, in attempt to reduce his claim repayment. He couldn't find anything that stipulates that for being on the road you are immediately at fault, and after persistence they dropped the matter.

However, the R33 in this incidence looks to be in a tricky situation. I'm hoping for his sake that turns out OK.

It wont say that you're immediatly at fault, but you will be at fault to a certain extent for just being on the road to start with. We all know u wont be in a car crash if u dont get in a car to start with :)

Im sure if any insurance company chose to, they could dispute any matter, as they will always have enough money to spend on a court case than u or i would even consider.

Every case is different, so yes your friend may have been let off in the past, this case may swing in totally the other way...depends whose insurance guy has had a hard day :D

There probably wont be much the r33 could say other than he failed to give way.

i hope the commo driver gets found at fault, only reason being he has full comp and the other guy doesnt, but apart from that he did turn in front of the other guy. In that situation i make sure everyone coming is definately not going through and is slowing down before i cross over.

Thats right i would have waited.. no matter even if on coming traffic was beeping there horns, caz what would they do run in to you and then there at fault. But the main point is that every one survived :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...