Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

If you could only get 1 of the two mods mentioned above at one time - would would you get first?

Car is used for track days once a month as an idea.

basically reducing understeer and get some more negative camber - which would you get first up - as in if you could only get 1 due to funds etc.

ideas and comments please

:mellow:

Cheers guys!

static camber?

dynamic camber?

Im a n00b at suspension still....so yes, still learning the lingo!

how do both differ from each other?

the effect of caster is that it adds "dynamic camber" - the more you turn the wheel the more camber you get. but when you straighten the wheel, camber gets less. this is good because the tyres lean into the corner when they need to (under load) and not when you're driving straight.

For a street driven car, castor is definitely much better. Too much camber will wear your tyres too much. If you had an R32 though, I would go camber kit first because you gain castor as you increase camber due to the angle of the upper arm.

Get castor adjustment and get as much as you can without scrubbing your front bar.

Static camber: The amount of camber when there is no movement. No moving of the wheel up and down from bumps, no turning of the steering wheel.

Dynamic camber: The change in camber as the suspension goes through its travel and the effects of castor as you turn the wheel

Edited by salad

Hmm, having done the two mods in turn I would strongly recommend you do the camber adjustment BEFORE the caster adjustment. The amount of -ve camber the caster adds is suprisingly small when you have a quarter of turn of lock on. Certainly much less than the one degree or so a camber kit will offer. Skylines need -ve camber at the front to generate cornering grip, otherwise you just end up with an understeering pig.

Also, if you haven't already you need to get the cars roll under control - which means sway bars & dampers.

Any even half serious track day will consume tyres at a far greater rate than even a large amount of road travel. Once a month is a lot of track time as far as tyres are concerned. You wil probably chunk the tread blocks - hence I would suggest getting yourself a proper track tyre even if it is only a Falken or Federal or similar.

thanks for the reply guys, I think at this stage I'll go the front adjustable caster and f & r sway bars.

:laugh:

I've been reading this thread with great interest, as my car understeers a bit too.

Any idea on a good adjustable camber kit? I'm not sure where to start.

cheers,

padey

I've been reading this thread with great interest, as my car understeers a bit too.

Any idea on a good adjustable camber kit? I'm not sure where to start.

cheers,

padey

You won't stop an R32 R understeering until you either dial in some more -ve camber and/or get the front end roll under control. Check the group buy section for Whiteline bits. I would recommend using something like this kit rather than the Noltec style upper arms or the other Midori style upper links. don;t worry about caster either as this does very little to help things.

Also do a search for the part number to see a useful discussion on the same.

is that just in regards to the 32 gtr's?

No. In fact it is a truism for almost all cars heading out onto a circuit.

To be properly balanced you don't want much steering lock through the corner. Any more than about a quarter on a GT-R & it is an ugly thing. With this relatively small amount of lock you really need ALOT of caster to make a difference. R32 GT-R's only have 3 degrees. Going to 4 or 5 makes the steering heavier & more self centring (Which is why drift nuggets love caster) but really doesn't do much for your grip.

It is one of those things that if fine as far as it goes, but is secondary to other, more important parameters, ie camber.

Edited by djr81

well, personally I loved the difference the caster made. but yes the camber is important too, and overall makes a much bigger difference to mid corner grip. but I did like the feel at turn in with more caster (and yes I did both seperately).

before doing camber and caster I'd say look at sway bars, shocks and springs, and then you may as well do camber and caster too as they can be done cheaply if you use the offset bushes.

personally I have the midori arms and don't have any problem with them, but I'm about to try out the noltec ones so I'll let you know what they are like.

But as was said....extra camber is a disaster for street tyre wear, they can often have too much already once you lower them a bit.

Do the sway bars and caster kit first I reckon

But as was said....extra camber is a disaster for street tyre wear, they can often have too much already once you lower them a bit.

Do the sway bars and caster kit first I reckon

The thing that caught my eye was that he was talking about track days once a month. That sort of regime will punish the tyres much harder on the track than on the road. Hence the suggestion of doing the camber first.

Edit: gees, I wish I could spell.

Edited by djr81

you should get firefox. It spell checks for you :huh:

Seeing as we are now talking about sway bars, I'd have to agree that of everything i've done it has made the biggest diffence to the cornering of my car (with the possible exception of running semi slicks)

you should get firefox. It spell checks for you :P

Seeing as we are now talking about sway bars, I'd have to agree that of everything i've done it has made the biggest diffence to the cornering of my car (with the possible exception of running semi slicks)

Work computer. But I probably should have paid attention at school too. :huh:

For me the biggest difference was new dampers. Just a different world. Sway bars weren't that huge for me.

Dampers do a lot, but they're probably not the most cost effective method of improving handling as good dampers aren't cheap. Swaybars however, are quite cheap and I also found that they did quite a bit in improving handling.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is awesome.     
    • Thanks for the quick replies guys its appreciated. A small extension was welded onto the standard 6boost external gate pipe which you can see where the pipe goes from black to stainless just below and to the right of the rear housing in the first picture. Overall I would say the flow is pretty good other than 6boosts choice to come straight off the collector at a decent angle.. Not sure why I went with two valves, I originally replaced the stock twin bovs with the GFB when I had the twins on. When I purchased the EFR it came with the Turbosmart Kompact BOV so I figured that would be a better option than the stock EFR Bov. I don't believe the Turbosmart BOV is adjustable? When I get the spike and then sudden dip in boost pressure, the turbo speed does drop as well. Stock head size wise however I believe it has Neo Turbo springs and a Neo Turbo intake camshaft and an aftermarket exhaust camshaft in the vicinity of 260 degrees. We didn't try a different MAC valve, we tried two different ways of plumbing it and we also tried removing the mac valve entirely and just having the boost source from the turbo directly connected to the wastegate and it still spiked / dropped and exhibited the same behaviour. Standard R33 GTR 5 speed tansmission. I'm running a Haltech Elite 2500 and can provide some logs if you. I understand what you're saying in that it looks like an auto plot however no, it's still a manual and it just has a lot of torque down low, for all intents and purposes it's a very impressive street car. I've attached a photo of the quickbitz dyno plot which was when the only difference is I was running -5 twin turbos with a mac valve. As you can see theres a decent dip in AFRs between 125kmh and 135kmh. Our problem now is not that the AFRs are dropping, just the boost pressure is dropping, however it is evident in the same RPM range of the map, coincidentally or not.
    • What transmission are you running?  It's a bit tricky with the scaling, but at face value the power "curve" looks more like a "line" which is a bit odd... basically a lot more like a dyno plot I'd expect with a highish (compared to a factory auto) stall torque converter type setup. If this is running an auto then this kind of boost control challenge is definitely a thing, the rpm scale on the dyno doesn't reflect what the engine is actually doing (unless the dyno has access to the engine's ACTUAL speed electronically) and what you'll get is a big rpm flare up as the engine torque launches past the converter pump's ability to resist torque at that rpm, then as the converter starts picking up rpm it will kinda even out again and the engine rpm will pick up more steadily. The trick with this "flare up" is if it's kinda near the boost threshold for the turbo then the engine's airflow requirements to maintain the previous boost level will outrun the turbo's ability to supply that boost - so you end up with a natural flattening off, if not dip when that happens.   If you are running closed loop, or even tune the "feed forward" wastegate duty cycle to deal with that rpm spike then when the engine starts settling to a more typical climb you'll actually have a situation where the gate is "too closed" and boost will run away for a bit, then have to pull down again.      It's not trivial to get this perfect as most boost control systems are generally expecting more predictable engine rpm rates of change, but if you *know* that's whats going on then you can at least "accept your fate" and realise getting that area perfect is kinda chasing your tail a bit, and assume that if the rest is working sensibly and the spike/dip isn't completely uncontrolled then you should be good. Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent, but the dyno plot and boost control behaviour look a LOT like what I've seen tuning autos in the past. What ECU are you running? Could possibly be convinced into looking at logs if I get too bored this weekend haha.
    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
    • Photo of manifold showing gate location? I mean, it's 6Boost, so we probably shouldn't be worrying, but always wroth knowing what the layout is. Plumbed back to atmosphere? Or into the dump?
×
×
  • Create New...